tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post1621708034531620284..comments2024-03-28T02:11:54.900+10:00Comments on GUN WATCH: Ammoland Quoted in the New York Times, on Second Amendmentjonjayrayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13363092874281160320noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-62083918745080690822019-01-12T13:29:30.329+10:002019-01-12T13:29:30.329+10:00The united states congress and the state legislatu... The united states congress and the state legislatures are forbidden to write laws concerning the second amendment by the Phrase "Shall Not Be Infringed. In the language of 1787-89 Shall Not is an absolute command.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-26358444965126870332019-01-12T13:26:00.726+10:002019-01-12T13:26:00.726+10:00I consider my self a constitutional textualist. I ...I consider my self a constitutional textualist. I am self trained in the laws. I have represented myself seven times and won every time, very difficult with todays corrupt courts. I believe I know when the supreme court went astray. I have studied the national archived documents from the framers, their notes and communications with each other to understand original intent. You have to read the constitution with an understanding of the English language of 1787. Understand English contract law and understand the framers wrote the constitution as a contract between the government it created and the people it was meant to serve. Read the entire constitution and find the written authority for any one to interpret it. The word interpret does not exist any where in the original constitution or the bill of rights. in 1803 the United States Supreme Court ruled it had the authority to interpret the constitution In the Marbury v Madison case. violating their oath of office as to ad that authority would require a constitutional amendment. all courts have been interpreting the laws ever since. The framers left that authority out for good reason, they lived through the kings magistrates abuses of the authority to interpret. They wrote the constitution and the bill of rights to be enforc3ed as written, without bias or opinion. like any legal contract of that time. Read the preamble of the constitution. It makes it very clear the constitution was written for all future generations. It states "we do ordain and establish this constitution for ourselves and our posterity" Posterity means all succeeding generations. Citizenship is passed from one generation to the next by the legal citizens created at the time of ratification. They made the authority to determine naturalization of foreigners the responsibility of the federal government, specifically the congress with no authority to the states. As I have said before to ad words to the second amendment requires a constitutional amendment. What this means is there are no constitutionally valid guns laws or restrictions. Congress does not have the authority to amendment the constitution by passing an act. What does this mean? all acts concerning the second amendment are constitutionally invalid. In the Marbury v Madison case it actually states " a law repugnant to the constitution is void" since the second amendment has never been legally changed there are no valid federal laws or acts and because of the tenth amendment there is no states right to place limitations on the second amendment. they are all repugnant to the constitution because there is no written authority to do so. The supreme court has also ruled that your rights travel with you even across state lines and all federally guaranteed right are equal in force of effect. This means you have the right to keep and bear arms any where at any time without restrictions. to exercise your guaranteed constitutional rights no permit or license can be required. Do you have your right to speak license? Do you have your license to attend the church of your choice. Do you have your license to travel any where in this country? The government stopped the mandatory study of the constitution, civics classes, in the 1970s. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-408457986431845152019-01-12T02:45:45.014+10:002019-01-12T02:45:45.014+10:00Progressives never look back. They view history as...Progressives never look back. They view history as an anchor that keeps them from moving forward toward their utopia.ScienceABC123https://www.blogger.com/profile/11989331237612987528noreply@blogger.com