tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post4199228346612419004..comments2024-03-28T02:11:54.900+10:00Comments on GUN WATCH: WI: Madison Banning Guns on City Transit Heard at Supreme Courtjonjayrayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13363092874281160320noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-55603175453782391602016-09-12T13:32:24.085+10:002016-09-12T13:32:24.085+10:00That is the problem with electing lawyers to offic...That is the problem with electing lawyers to office. they write the laws that make their profession richer when many of these issues should never reach court.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-73203782385089051302016-09-12T07:39:24.271+10:002016-09-12T07:39:24.271+10:00I think a civil rights violation law suit should b...I think a civil rights violation law suit should be filed against the individuals that approved this ruling. an important issue like this should hit deep pockets and go for the max of 15 million dollars. It is time to make some examples and put these jerks on notice. One or two wins would put all of the gun grabber in the nation on notice and in their place. It is time the tenth amendment came out of the shadows and started being enforced.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-81417571419515463792016-09-11T13:32:30.831+10:002016-09-11T13:32:30.831+10:00At issue here is a matter of federally protected r...At issue here is a matter of federally protected rights. Not only are the rights specifically protected by name, and left to the people themselves, not state government (as the Tenth Amendment makes clear that people and state are two different entities) We The People had to go further yet to spell it out to the state government's specifically that they are prohibited from even making laws, much less enforcing them, when enumerated rights are at issue. <br /> <br />It is a profound mistake - and a dishonor to the Second Amendment and every person that advocated for it and defended it with their blood and lives, to argue this is a problem that "state laws" control or that a state court is empowered to settle. <br /> <br />The highest law in the land is in control here, and the highest court in the land is where this should be - not in state court. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-39906617731024100992016-09-11T12:36:45.709+10:002016-09-11T12:36:45.709+10:00This has been my argument for a very long time the...This has been my argument for a very long time the Congress can not create an agency that will do the infringing for it. Thus the city can not claim no responsibility for the action of the transit authority. The state law is very specific the second amendment is very specific. No infringement and no preemption. people appointed to office are not elected laws makers, they have no rule or law making authority. What penalties are in the law for violating the law. who gets fired , who goes to jail, who pays the fine, who gets impeached? If the law makers would start rolling some heads they may get better compliance. good ole boys and cronyism has run its course, they have to start making some examples. it is time for some justice for the office holders, kick them out, put them in jail , make them pay heavy fines out of their own pockets. kick them out of politics. before the citizen run them out of town on a rail after tar and feathers. I recently found out the weight capacity of the special rope I bought. its good for 560 pounds. It is very limber and should make a good noose.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com