tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post4742475579067751766..comments2024-03-28T02:11:54.900+10:00Comments on GUN WATCH: Iowa Chief Justice Bans Weaponsjonjayrayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13363092874281160320noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-33949355793659488492017-07-08T08:13:42.035+10:002017-07-08T08:13:42.035+10:00Read the law carefully Impeachment and removal are...Read the law carefully Impeachment and removal are tided together, they can not be separated If charged and convicted you must be removed from office. Once charged the trial must follow. No plea bargain. Impeachment is for crimes against the people or the constitution or the country. Bill Clinton was impeached but not removed he made a plea bargain he gave up his license to practice law to avoid a trial. it was unconstitutional. If he had been tried the Clinton foundation would never have existed. at least he could not have had his hands in it. to be tried and removed has the same penalties as a felony conviction. he would not have a pension, the right to vote or carry a gun under current law. He could never hold office a gain or receive any money from government revenue. He would live a life of disgrace for violating the public trust. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-60938889254753927272017-06-25T03:38:02.548+10:002017-06-25T03:38:02.548+10:00According to the constitution a president may Be i...According to the constitution a president may Be impeached (charged) and removed (convicted for high crimes (felonies) and or misdemeanors (low crimes) including misbehavior. Obama should have been impeached and removed when he went to Germany and declared we are no longer a Christian nation. in the Sisters of Trinity case USSC 1892. the supreme court declared we are a Christian nation. supreme court rulings are law, that means Obama violated the law or misbehaved. he over ruled the court.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-54299724725921542322017-06-23T03:23:04.764+10:002017-06-23T03:23:04.764+10:00There is also conflicting authority in the federal...There is also conflicting authority in the federal courts. The only federal court created by the constitution is the Supreme Court. All other federal courts are created by congress. But some of the rules governing federal courts are dictated by the Supreme Court, unless, or until, congress has legislated them.<br /><br />When congress does want to involve itself, to carry out structural and/or procedural reform in the federal courts, long overdue, the process begins in the Senate and House Judiciary committees. Importantly, there are organizations that oversee regular operations, that are half in and half out of the judicial branch. Things such as sentencing guidelines, case assignments, and discipline that does not rise to the level of impeachment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-68668664133442367342017-06-23T03:22:36.317+10:002017-06-23T03:22:36.317+10:00"It is legal for the Chief Justice of IA to d..."It is legal for the Chief Justice of IA to do this ..."<br /><br />I hope that's not a legal opinion! Because Anon's got the judge's number on this one! Judges act as G*D, and think they can do anything they fancy. They routinely harass, threaten, and even jail grass-root-activists merely handing out FIJA (Fully Informed Juror Association) pamphlets on public streets in front of courthouses. Judges are terrified of push back in any form.<br /><br />As the article points out, no 'gun check' has yet been established in IA to allow carry between parking/courthouse. What about potential jurors, or others visiting a courthouse? Should they be defenseless as they walk? Should they leave their guns home - rather than risk theft from their vehicles - and be defenseless the entire trip?<br /><br />NO judge must ever be allowed to exercise this level of control over the life of anyone.DamnYankeenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-3850182863408840232017-06-22T10:15:08.932+10:002017-06-22T10:15:08.932+10:00No judicial officer has the authority to create la...No judicial officer has the authority to create law from the bench. that judge needs to be impeached. judges have no authority to change laws. it is the authority of the state legislature to pass laws and it is the duty of judicial officer to enforce those laws as written. Only when a law is challenged as unconstitutional can the court step in and make a ruling determined by constitutional authority for the law to exist. the entire law can be nullified for unconstitutional flaws but judges have no authority to modify laws. the legislature tells the courts what the law is the courts do not tell the legislature what the law is. the state legislature needs to impeach that judge for violating his oath of office. there is no authority for the judge to correct what the legislature determines is sound law. it would have to state in the state constitution that courts property is exempt. Activist judges all across this country are a major problem. read judicial duties and authority in American jurisprudence volume 16 second edition.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com