tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post6616533642492221135..comments2024-03-29T23:46:19.096+10:00Comments on GUN WATCH: New York Times gets Gun Stories Wrongjonjayrayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13363092874281160320noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-51353623730128864572016-10-24T23:31:19.284+10:002016-10-24T23:31:19.284+10:00Laws do not prevent crime they are used to punish ...Laws do not prevent crime they are used to punish crime Like was said above there has to be a victim for a crime to exist. laws define the victim. some people are afraid of the dark. to bad the sun does go down every day. some claim fear of guns to bad they are never going away. people that fear the dark should stay home with the lights on people that fear guns shave the ability to turn their heads and look the other way. their phobias are not my problem, I'm not going to pay their light bill and I am not going to stop carrying.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-87689525258357494272016-10-24T07:20:19.376+10:002016-10-24T07:20:19.376+10:00The New York Times doesn't 'Get' stori...The New York Times doesn't 'Get' stories wrong. It TELLS stories wrong, because it has an agenda, and not a subtle one. C. S. P. Schofieldhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18307088118631856756noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-48552970156250978972016-10-24T02:35:38.448+10:002016-10-24T02:35:38.448+10:00They don't " get it wrong " or misq...They don't " get it wrong " or misquote or lack information ... they flat out LIE !!<br /><br />The media has been lying to us for decades and when caught they say ' oopppss ' <br /><br />The old guard gatekeepers are DEAD. What they call the - Alt -Right is simply the TRUTH GETTING OUT !!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-75603666984979571182016-10-23T23:11:04.388+10:002016-10-23T23:11:04.388+10:00as I have said before Shall Not Be Infringed is al...as I have said before Shall Not Be Infringed is all inclusive, even the 1934 NFA is unconstitutional. Not very many people can John Wayne an M-60 and only the government would fear anyone that can. they teach you how and then say you cant have one. Not a good Idea to use a Thompson for deer hunting but they will bring down a deer or a grizzly or a heard of gun grabbers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-4445516362275109002016-10-23T22:59:52.116+10:002016-10-23T22:59:52.116+10:00The picture appears to show a homerless gun. I do ...The picture appears to show a homerless gun. I do not like hammerless guns, I think they cause accidents. they went hammerless to avoid the safety bar. You need thumb control of the hammer.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-23705872236370921362016-10-23T11:03:04.841+10:002016-10-23T11:03:04.841+10:00Those couple of paragraphs demonstrate willful ign...Those couple of paragraphs demonstrate willful ignorance (otherwise known as intentional intellectual dishonesty). Within them is the plain, but disguised, admission that there are no legislative solutions because even absolute prohibition for "felons" nether stops a person from getting a gun nor doing something nefarious with that gun they get. <br /> <br />This is what they call "journalism" today, or sometimes even "critical thinking skills". Really it can not get any more ridiculous than that display. <br /> <br />The real deal is that Laws (code) has a function, a specific purpose. While a side effect can sometimes be deterrence, the primary focus is to punish someone for something they already did to someone else. It seems to go without saying that a crime requires a criminal and a victim, right? That means for there to have been a crime to punish, a victim must be present. Yet, we see all these laws claimed to be there to "prevent crime". Ahem. <br /> <br />The only thing these laws prevent is rights exercised by innocent people. They are admitting in that piece that even outright infringement to the tune of absolute prohibition is useless, is not effective, does not produce what they claim it "would". In that sense, they admit the abject failure of the very thing they continue to demand more of - when they know full well that it isn't and cannot be the "solution". <br /> <br />Enough of it. The "prevention" dogma has to be called out and demolished for the false premise that it is now and has always been. It is time for the abridgements and infringements to be eliminated from code - and I mean all of it from the most local tiny unit of government like a homeowners association or a School Board all the way up to the federal code itself. In addition, it is time for the 'gun debate' to end, because it really and truly ended two centuries ago with the same answer that their own admission today shows - The Second Amendment IS the solution, and it amazingly has been all along. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com