tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post1572501086927805478..comments2024-03-28T02:11:54.900+10:00Comments on GUN WATCH: FL: "Straw Purchase" v. Discrimination Crossfire Demonstratedjonjayrayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13363092874281160320noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-14210734635063163732016-11-30T07:23:10.766+10:002016-11-30T07:23:10.766+10:00Look at Chicago. I'd say the restrictive gun c...Look at Chicago. I'd say the restrictive gun control laws are a form of discrimination. Cook County laws are worse than the reset of the state. Why? Could it be to keep blacks from owning firearms? <br /><br />I consider many firearm laws to be the last Jim Crow laws. <br /><br />Even AWB in Chicago should be considered a Jim Crow Law. If I lived there, I would want an AR 15 or two in my emergency preparedness kit. Yosemite Samhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12868454884527870755noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-61608163767558525302016-11-26T09:39:26.032+10:002016-11-26T09:39:26.032+10:00a/ Why does he have this long Muslim slave name? ...a/ Why does he have this long Muslim slave name? Doesn't he realize his ancestors worked with Arab muslims to sell his GGGP's to the Euro slave traders?<br /><br />b/ He may never shop at BPS again. If he has never hunted before, wth has he bought there?<br /><br />c/ he's never fired a weapon and his friend is taking him shopping? His friend is not smart. All new shooters should get range time with either an NRA certified R.O. or similarly safety-focussed, experienced shooter, so that they learn the 4 rules and additional basic gun handling.<br /><br />If he's not rushing to buy for self defense, taking him shopping for a hunting rifle without any shooting experience whatsoever is just plain dumb.<br /><br />BPS may have just saved some lives.BTnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-79967841522614300362016-11-25T10:10:11.180+10:002016-11-25T10:10:11.180+10:00NO!
A permission slip from government does NOT in...NO! <br />A permission slip from government does NOT in and of itself DEFINE wether or not the intent carried is right and proper or maliciously evil. ONLY a personal choice made by an individual themselves can establish this intent. <br /> <br />Being conned into having government usurp the ability to decide intent is pathetically stupid. It is short sighted and is the death knell of self evident truths in their entirety - BECAUSE the only truth will be whatever government permits it to be. <br /> <br />Don't be a sucker. Don't beg for tyranny by begging for permission slips. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-43195795155257574392016-11-25T05:32:42.555+10:002016-11-25T05:32:42.555+10:00An excellent example of why background checks don&...An excellent example of why background checks don't work, and they create more problems than they purport to solve. Progressives/leftists will never admit that gun laws don't work, to them it's all about control.ScienceABC123https://www.blogger.com/profile/11989331237612987528noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-50177482036598885712016-11-25T03:39:26.123+10:002016-11-25T03:39:26.123+10:00The second amendment has 26 enforceable words in i...The second amendment has 26 enforceable words in it. By legal definition any other words added to it are repugnant to the constitution and are therefore void. the 1934 NFA, 1968 and 1986 GCAs and any state or local laws are also additions that are by definition infringements and are repugnant and void. The supreme court has ruled. if it is not written it does not exist and is not enforceable. for any other words to be enforceable they have to exist in the second amendment. Until the second amendment is legally amended to include new words. no other words are enforceable. Nothing in a state constitution is superior to the United States constitution. As stated in the U.S. constitution it is the supreme law of this land.<br />Basically the supreme court enforces what the tenth amendment declares. what is states rights and what is compliant with the federal constitution's authority.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com