tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post2579023872414388181..comments2024-03-29T23:46:19.096+10:00Comments on GUN WATCH: The Charge agianst St. Louis Couople for Defending their Homejonjayrayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13363092874281160320noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-10578032594699783122020-07-27T13:06:01.577+10:002020-07-27T13:06:01.577+10:00There is no authority to deny any one the right of...There is no authority to deny any one the right of self defense there is no reason for any one to be forced to retreat. retreating can get you shot in the back The concept of the second amendment is to display a weapon to prevent an attack and use the weapons to prevent bodily harm. Loss of property or harm to another. The framers of the constitution wrote the second amendment to prevent abusive government over reach. too much government's ever increasing abusive authority.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-46998508975027805592020-07-24T18:09:59.081+10:002020-07-24T18:09:59.081+10:00Keep reporting on this story. A recent report says...Keep reporting on this story. A recent report says that the prosecutor tampered with evidence by "reassembling" the handgun to make it operable. The defendants have stated that they knew the gun was inoperable while it was displayed during this incident. The defendants are lawyers so what they say about the circumstances needs to take this in to account. They are sworn officers of the court and if they are determined to be lying they can be disbarred.<br />Thanks, Dean. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-741433332503960832020-07-24T10:27:49.216+10:002020-07-24T10:27:49.216+10:00DA is immune?
Can't the prosecutor be charged...DA is immune?<br /><br />Can't the prosecutor be charged with a violation of 18 USC, depravation of rights under color of law?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-51665703067486442222020-07-24T07:21:57.393+10:002020-07-24T07:21:57.393+10:00She "IS" pointing" the gun at them,...She "IS" pointing" the gun at them, but I can't tell where her trigger finger is, on the trigger or not? <br />However I believe the homeowners are and have the right to defend their home and property!Wireless.Philhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00327912256022939023noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-37164880760323535152020-07-24T00:49:41.058+10:002020-07-24T00:49:41.058+10:00Clause 4 is clearly un-Constitutional. Take for ex...Clause 4 is clearly un-Constitutional. Take for example the case where someone breaks into a home and the armed homeowner confronts them. Clause 4 tries to make the homeowner the criminal in this case.ScienceABC123https://www.blogger.com/profile/11989331237612987528noreply@blogger.com