tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post8643117722888659759..comments2024-03-29T16:46:05.579+10:00Comments on GUN WATCH: Life Anti-Second Amendment Editorial from 1967jonjayrayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13363092874281160320noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-77817172934836570412016-01-17T10:52:05.104+10:002016-01-17T10:52:05.104+10:00The difference being when I was in Vietnam in 1968...The difference being when I was in Vietnam in 1968 it was not people wanting to rob a liquor store that were shooting at me. Self defense is self defense where ever you are.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-7125688181046615562016-01-17T10:41:34.301+10:002016-01-17T10:41:34.301+10:00Nobody needs an anti tank gun until you have a tan...Nobody needs an anti tank gun until you have a tank to destroy and then if you do not have an anti tank gun that tank is going to destroy you. If this country were invaded by a foreign military how many tanks would they bring with them? How many of those tanks could we destroy if we do not have the weapons to do it with? When the militia are called to arms to defend this nation, who are the militia. we the people are the militia why should we not be armed? The second amendment has nothing in it that allows government to control any weapons we may want to own. I have several weapons that never get used because they have special uses that rarely ever come up. I have the right to be prepared at all times for what ever could possibly come up. emergencies do not happen by appointment. If I see an enemy tank coming down the road it is too late to go online and place an order. although I know other ways to take out a tank I would prefer having an RPG. safer, faster and more effective. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com