tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post909350067281549836..comments2024-03-28T02:11:54.900+10:00Comments on GUN WATCH: The Volokh Conspiracy: The history of magazines holding 11 or more rounds: Amicus brief in 9th Circuitjonjayrayhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13363092874281160320noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7877849.post-85358130558623630972014-05-31T00:26:36.259+10:002014-05-31T00:26:36.259+10:00Okay. Sure. This is a good writup on the history...Okay. Sure. This is a good writup on the history of the gun magazine, and argues effectively against the SC's decision. But they're almost falling for a non sequitor, in the informal sense.<br /><br />It makes no difference if magazines did or did not exist. That's why there is no mention of current technology in the BOR or Constitution.<br /><br />By that same arguement, the SC can argue that thermal imaging through a house doesn't violate the 4th Am. Or, that computer use regulation doesn't violate the 1st Am.<br /><br />This whole arguement of "they didn't have it then" is bogus.Chrisnoreply@blogger.com