Excellent Intell in Advance of the San Antonio Open Carry Event
This is a very interesting bit of intellegence regarding the preparations for the coming open carry event planned for SanAntonio, Texas on 19 October, 2013. Please give a click to Mike Vanderboegh of Sipsey Street Irregulars the source of this article. I only reproduce it here in full in order to spread the word.
"Katy bar the door if I’m wrong." Interesting information on San
Antonio Police Department preparations for the 19 October event.
I will be heading to San Antonio on Thursday and expect to arrive there early Friday afternoon for the Come and Take It San Antonio rally.
I received the communication below from a reader
and it reveals some interesting information on the police preparations
on the part of SAPD. It also reveals the Achilles' Heel of their plans.
In any case, I'm going. Hope to see you there. (And for anyone who's
not going but wishes they could, let me shamelessly rattle my tin cup
for some gas money to get there.) I don't believe that bail money (or
ER co-pay) will be required, but you never can tell. It's all up to the
obtuse collectivists running San Antonio. ;-) -- Mike
Mike,
I follow your blog daily. While I do not agree with
everything, most of your analysis unfortunately is spot on. Thanks for
your diligence in informing those of us who still care.
I am writing to let you know some information concerning the upcoming Open Carry Event in San Antonio.
This event will take place in my backyard so in preparation
to attend I was doing a little research and found some information that
may be of interest to all attendees. To give some framework to my
concerns, I am an ex-SAPD officer and as such have contacts whom I
questioned in regard to likely actions by SAPD during this event.
While I was not totally stunned, I was dismayed to find that
the department higher ups were actually formulating a vigorous response
to this event. Given the worthless liberal, camera seeking clown of a
police chief I suppose this was to be anticipated.
I was informed that patrol officers attending in-service
training courses and other meetings/roll calls have been informed that
department heads (i.e. Knickers in a bunch Chief McManus) have
determined that officers will be told/ordered to make arrests for
disorderly conduct. Their reasoning/justification? Any citizens
wishing to set up a confrontation with the police by open carrying a
rifle will be considered to be acting in a manner contrary to the public
peace and good order. Apparently officers no longer have the internal
fortitude to see a firearm in the hands of legal citizens (sarcasm).
Not a particularly well thought out legal premise considering it is
entirely legal under state law to carry openly (cities cannot
pass/enforce any ordinances which contradict state law) and particularly
of concern is that the police officials/legal counsel are
pre-constructing their own “probable cause” (quoted from source) for
justification prior to even observing any law breaking conduct. The
only applicable city ordinance for our consideration is that the
firearms cannot be loaded within city limits. When outside city limits
the firearms can be carried loaded without permit, etc. and many cities
respect their citizens enough to not even pass an ordinance banning
loaded firearms within their jurisdiction. State law 42.01 Disorderly
Conduct (8) states an offense is committed only when a person displays a
firearm or other deadly weapon in a public place in a manner calculated
to alarm; so the act of carrying without intent to alarm is not
unlawful, despite the implication made by SAPD, the misguided sergeant,
who had his officers issue misdemeanor citations to the Open Carry
advocates at the local Starbucks (re: You tube video - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vN0GcahEvIc)
Several interesting points need to be considered here. Many people do
not know that the city of San Antonio is self insured. Let’s say that
again, San Antonio is a self insured city, meaning they have to defend
personally against all lawsuits themselves and must pay out of their
own pocket/city budget for the unlawful screw-ups of their employees.
Police officers screwing the public have cost them dearly in the past.
One of the reasons I write this is to put this information out prior to
the event so that any one arrested illegally will have recourse in the
courts and the information to make it stick. Taking a lawsuit
settlement from the city of San Antonio, when wronged by city employees,
tends to piss off voters and politicians alike (particularly those
politicians like the current mayor who is more interested in buying
voters and influence to further his/their agenda and careers).
Another point of interest; based on this information that the SAPD will
not be enforcing state laws or city ordinance but that of internal ego
generated policy it will allow for a lawsuit against individual officers
and the entire chain of command individually as well as the city who
failed to properly train, supervise, etc.. Police department “special
orders” require officers to not “shirk” their legal duties and also it
is clear both by law and policy that any individual officer making an
arrest of this nature must act as the chief complainant so the burden
for evidence is based on the arresting officers testimony. This is
entirely negated when, as I will do and expect others to also do, the
arrest incident is videotaped and publicly posted. Cockroaches, in any
uniform and any rank, hate the light of truth.
The regular patrol officers here in San Antonio, are in the
main, professional in conduct. Interestingly, the department has had
several incidents, not publicly discussed, where a lower ranking officer
has declined, anywhere from respectfully declining to full outright
indignant “stick where the sun don’t shine” refusal, to act against an
individual citizen when so ordered to do so by a higher ranking officer
(Sgt/Lt/etc.). Patrol officers are allowed, under law and legal
process, complete and full discretion in whether or not to make an
arrest. The arresting officer makes the written report and has to do
the testifying regarding their lawful actions (or otherwise). Many
officers have realized that the answer is simple to the quandary of an
ordered arrest, if they disagree then they simply tell that superior
ranking officer that they are also commissioned police officers granted
under city charter and certified by Texas Standards TECLOSE (MBV note: Texas Commission on Law Enforcement Officer Standards and Education)
and that if they believe “they” have witnessed a crime then they are
“shirking” their duty if they do not make the arrest. Needless to say
most overbearing superiors decline to follow through and settle with
threatening and internally trying to punish the subordinate for
“insubordination”. While I cannot say that it wouldn’t work today, in
my time it was an epic mistake to screw with the regular troops when
they were comporting themselves both legally and ethically. Most street
officers will act with professionalism and exercise discretion. Those
with true leadership in the command ranks will also support the lawful
actions of the officers under their supervision/command. On the other
hand there will be those politically correct/oriented types with their
noses buried to the hilt up the backside of higher ranking officers as
well as the Rambo-type “Only Ones” whose ego will not be denied, who
will deny their own responsibility and act contrary to the constitution
and state law.
I could go on about how to handle oneself while at this
event but the best advice I have is to just be a true American citizen
exercising your constitutionally and state recognized rights. Be
respectful but insist on respect in return. I personally have a couple
of plans that may be invoked to expose any illegalities performed by any
SAPD officer, Park Ranger, etc. but I sincerely hope that sanity will
prevail, no bond money or lawyers will be needed. More than anything I
want you to witness that true professional law enforcement exists in
Texas, in other words, peaceful, lawful assembly fully respected by
government officials/agents. Katy bar the door if I’m wrong.
Sincerely look forward to meeting/seeing you here in SA.
SIGNATURE REDACTED
LATER: I sent a copy of this
to the Mayor and City Council of San Antonio with the note: "Posted on
my blog this morning. And, I might add, we're seeking some adult
supervision and cool heads in the SAPD."
Mike Vanderboegh
Source: Sipsey Street Irregulars
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spammers: You are wasting your time. Irrelevant comments will not be published