Not everyone will agree with everything Neil says here. But, he is on the money when he talks about the projection of the left.
A long time ago, on May 14, 2000, Mother's Day, the fraudulently
named "Million Mom March" against the unalienable individual, civil,
Constitutional, and human right of every man, woman, and responsible
child to obtain, own, and carry, openly or concealed, any weapon --
rifle, shotgun, handgun, machinegun, anything -- any time, any place, without asking anyone's permission, made its debut in my home town.
The city's protectors-and-servers were out in force, resplendent in
their nylon armor, fiberglass hats, and lucite face-shields, thanks no
doubt to our comic-relief city council's vision of angry white
middle-aged male gun owners taking their right-wing frustration out on
the paragons of maternal and civic virtue parading past them in the
street.
But the simple, if embarrassing truth is that it was the "marching
mothers" who were frustrated and angry. The harpies had already been
trounced, humiliated, and discredited at a town meeting in which Lenda
Jackson, a brilliant, indomitable high school teacher and NRA pistol
intructor, had led the charge, and I had introduced the term "victim
disarmament".
Those two words had reduced the other side's leader -- an old-time
professional leftist who clearly recognized the power-meme, originally
extracted from an academic study in Texas on "gun control", as a
death-knell for his side -- to a wobbling pile of Jell-O, barely able to
stumble out to his car in the middle of the meeting, and drive away.
On the day of the actual march, the only violence that occurred was
on the part of the hysterically shrieking biddies in the street, when
one of their number, an angry white middle-aged female, taking her
left-wing frustration out on anyone with the temerity to disagree with
her (or to suggest she was funny), attacked an onlooker with a
clip-board.
Thirteen years later (proving that time flies whether you're having
fun or not) Matt Drudge heads a story with two tiny images, one red, one
blue, standing at lecterns, having a political debate. The red,
presumably Republican figure just stands there as the blue Democrat
points a pistol at his head. It is a picture worth a thousand words.
It is occasioned by the fact -- only recently discovered by the
"lamestream media", that the overwhelming majority of spectacularly
telegenic violence carried out in this country, and traditionally blamed
on right-wing extremists, racists, Tea Partiers (for which read
ordinary American gun owners), is, in fact, really committed by the
left.
It's amazing how many left-wing sites you'll find, thanks mostly to
Google, whose proprietors vociferously deny this simple fact of the
matter. It must really sting to watch the movement of peace, love, and
flowers-in-your-hair reveal itself as the homicidal aggregation it is
and always has been. From the second Presidential assassin, Charles
Guiteau, to the last we know of, Lee Harvey Oswald (and you can throw in
wannabe killers like Lynette "Squeaky" Fromm, Sarah Jane Moore, and
John Hinckley), all have been advocates of one kind of socialism or
another. (There are some historians who will argue that John Wilkes
Booth was some kind of a leftist, but squint as I will, I can't see it.)
Look them up: Charles Guiteau; Leon Czolgosz; Lee Harvey Oswald;
Sirhan Bishara Sirhan; Charles Manson and his little friends Squeaky
Fromm and Sarah Jane Moore; Barack Obama's intellectual parents Bill
Ayers, Bernadine Dohrn, and Kathleen Boudin; Arthur Bremer; John
Hinckley; Theodore Kaczynski; Jim Jones (whose name should always be
brought up in Nancy Pelosi's presence the way Mary Jo Kopechne's was in
the presence of Teddy Kennedy); James Oliver Huberty; George "Jo Jo"
Pierre Hennard; James Daniel Simpson; Larry Gene Ashbrook; Eric Harris
and Dylan Klebold; Robert W. Pickett; Bruce Edward Ivins; John Allen
Williams and Lee Boyd Malvo; Douglas Williams; Seung-Hui Cho; Nidal
Malik Hasan; Carlos Bledsoe; James Holmes; Christopher Dorner; Ali Syed;
Paul Kevin Curtis; Dzhorak Tsarnaev; and Aaron Alexis, Marxists,
reverse-racists, redistributionists, collectivists one and all.
Our basic rights have been gradually, systematically ripped away from
each of us over the past half century, employing this gaggle of leftist
loons and religious fanatics as an excuse, in a display of collective
punishment unrivaled even by those we may have suffered in those havens
of anthill socialism, the public school system and the military.
This may not make sense to you and me. Even when the pattern of
liberal or "progressive" violence was not apparent, it still didn't make
sense. I wasn't Lee Harvey Oswald; I hadn't shot the President. Why
should I be subject to reams of new, patently unconstitutional
legislation? I wasn't Sirhan Sirhan; I hadn't shot the President's
brother.
I wasn't Arthur Bremer and I hadn't shot George Wallace. And I
certainly wasn't whoever it was who actually shot Martin Luther King.
But it makes perfect sense to liberals and "progressives", to whom
"logic is a little tweeting bird ... a wreath for pretty flowers that
smell bad".
These are individuals notoriously directed by their feelings, rather
than by the operation of their minds. They write songs about it. They
make whole movies about it. They live in a universe where it makes
perfect sense for a ghost to command a young fighter pilot to abandon
the instruments it no doubt took centuries and bilions of dollars or
kwatloos or pengoes or whatever to develop, and to "use the Force" --
fly by the seat of his pants -- instead. It is a world where it makes
perfect sense for that young fighter pilot to listen to a ghost.
Somehow, deep down inside, they know that people guided by their
hearts, their guts, their gonads -- any organ but their brains -- may do
anything, any time, on a whim. They don't trust themselves because they
know themselves. And because they have taught their children the
same poisonous ideas, they don't trust them, either. And through a
well-known psychological phenomenon known as "projection", in which they
impute the same motivations to others, they don't trust you and me.
They know they can't be trusted with a loaded gun in their hands. Who
knows what they might do -- they certainly don't. They might just feel a
whim to touch it off if you make them mad -- or happen to be Rush
Limbaugh or Sean Hannity or Glenn Beck or especially Michael Savage. And
because they can't trust themselves, you can't be trusted, either.
Projection.
If we were like them, anything like them, we would push through
legislation that strictly forbids any of those who call themselves
liberals,"progressives", socialists, communists, or who are registered
as Democrats or anything else on the left of life, to obtain, or carry
firearms.
And perhaps even to vote.
It would be a cleaner, safer world.
If it only saved one life.
For the children.
But we are not like them. We believe that the Founders wrote the Bill
of Rights for everyone, that it is "true for all men in all times", and
that those who hammered out the Common Law, painfully, and at
unimaginable cost to life, liberty, and property, knew what they were
doing when they said "Innocent until proven guilty by a court of law".
Consequently, the best ethical decency allows us is to recommend that
our poor liberal, "progressive", socialist, leftist, Marxist, Leninist,
communist, Maoist neighbors get some serious couch-time, soon.
Before they shoot somebody.
Author and lecturer L. Neil Smith is Senior Editorial Consultant
for Jews for the Preservation of Firearms Ownership. A fifty-year
veteran of the libertarian movement, he is the Author of 33 books
including The Probability Broach, Ceres, Sweeter Than Wine, And Down With Power: libertarian Policy In A Time Of Crisis. He is also the Publisher of The Libertarian Enterprise, now in its 17th year online.
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spammers: You are wasting your time. Irrelevant comments will not be published