Author's Note: The fight for student’s rights continues. The
series is stretching out longer than anticipated but you will want to
keep reading. There's some good news at the end of the road.
Dear Chancellor Miller (chancellor@uncw.edu);
After laying the groundwork in my previous correspondence, I finally
have an opportunity to respond to the sweeping claim that UNCW's
student affairs division treats student groups equally, regardless of
their political viewpoint. I will also respond to the Dean's claim that
there are hundreds of student groups on campus that have been approved
without any difficulties whatsoever. That claim suggests that those who
are not approved have somehow failed to comply with university policies
and procedures. The contrary evidence I will present will demonstrate
that there has been a pattern of misconduct in the Dean's office
extending over a period of more than a decade.
Let us start by going back to the first letter I wrote to you. We
can learn something by focusing on just one of the groups in question,
the Second Amendment Club. I have a special interest in this club
because I am their advisor.
I began to help the club with its application for official
recognition all the way back in August. The student affairs division has
required multiple resubmissions of the application since that time. Let
me provide some examples of suggested revisions from a recent
application, which was submitted seven months into the process. Again,
these are suggested revisions coming from your administration seven months into the application process:
- The administrator doesn't like the fact that we have the word
"sixty" in our application. He prefers that we use the numerical "60."
More Here
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spammers: You are wasting your time. Irrelevant comments will not be published