Rutherford Institute Press Release
Attorneys for The
Rutherford Institute have filed a lawsuit on behalf of a Virginia man
who was arrested by City of Hopewell police officers as he was engaged
in a First Amendment protest against President Obama while lawfully
carrying a rifle.
In a complaint filed in the U.S. District Court
for the Eastern District of Virginia, Rutherford Institute attorneys
allege that the police violated Brandon Howard's First Amendment right
to free speech, Second Amendment right to bear arms, and Fourth
Amendment right to be free from a groundless arrest when they confronted
Howard with guns drawn and ordered him to the ground on the mistaken
belief that Howard was violating the law by being in public with a rifle
slung over his shoulder.
Although Virginia law forbids carrying a
concealed weapon and the public display of a rifle in certain cities
and counties, Howard's possession and display of the rifle was wholly
legal and did not make him subject to an arrest. Moreover, the City of
Hopewell Police Department has admitted in writing that the incident
involved a violation of department policy.
"The U.S. government
has unfortunately adopted a ‘do what I say, not what I do' mindset when
it comes to Americans' rights overall. Nowhere is this double standard
more evident than in the government's attempts to arm itself to the
teeth, all the while viewing as suspect anyone who dares to legally own a
gun, let alone use one," said John W. Whitehead, president of The
Rutherford Institute and author of A Government of Wolves: The Emerging
American Police State.
"Indeed, as this case shows, while it
still technically remains legal to own a firearm in America, possessing
one can now get you pulled over, searched, arrested, subjected to all
manner of surveillance, treated as a suspect without ever having
committed a crime, shot at and killed. This same rule does not apply to
law enforcement officials, however, who are armed to the hilt and rarely
given more than a slap on the wrist for using their weapons against
unarmed individuals."
On Monday, Aug. 26, 2013, Brandon Howard
arrived at an overpass above Interstate 295 in the City of Hopewell,
Va., and displayed a 6 foot by 4 foot sign that read “Impeach Obama.”
Howard was carrying a DMTS Panther Arms AR-15 rifle slung over his
shoulder on a strap, and a .380 caliber Bersa Thunder sidearm pistol in a
belted holster on his waist. Howard lawfully owned each firearm and did
not point or brandish them at any time while engaged in his First
Amendment protest activity on the overpass.
Howard displayed his
protest sign for 30 minutes, but Howard did not directly engage with
anyone. At about 5:30 p.m., a police officer pulled up to the area,
remained in his car and observed Howard. Thereafter, three to five
additional police cruisers arrived at the scene with emergency lights
engaged. Approximately eight officers exited these vehicles with their
guns drawn and ordered Howard to drop his sign and get on the ground
with his hands spread above his head. Howard complied with the officers'
orders.
Despite the fact that Howard at no time made any
threatening action toward the officers or anyone else, one police
officer allegedly asked Howard, “What do you think you are doing
threatening people on my interstate?” Howard explained that he had not
threatened anyone but was simply exercising his First and Second
amendment rights. Howard was then handcuffed and transported to the
police station, where he was left, handcuffed, in an interrogation room
for 90 minutes, after which time he had his firearms returned and was
released.
A month later, the Deputy Chief of Police acknowledged
in writing that an internal investigation had concluded that one of the
officers violated department policy and would be disciplined and sent to
remedial training.
Attorney Raul Novo of Richmond, Va., is assisting The Rutherford Institute with the lawsuit.
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spammers: You are wasting your time. Irrelevant comments will not be published