It is a compelling argument that state governments cannot simply whittle away at second amendment rights until they are essentially voided.
The amicus brief argues Maryland’s law violates citizens’ core Second
Amendment right to keep firearms in their home for self-protection.
Plaintiffs in the case, Kolbe, et al., argued that the Maryland ban
completely prohibited the possession of commonly used firearms and some
of the most popular guns used by citizens for self-defense.
A U.S. District Court ruled the law did not violate the constitution.
“Our office is committed to defending law-abiding citizens’ Second
Amendment rights, and we believe this law clearly violates the
Constitution,” Morrisey said in a press release. “This law’s broad
categorical ban is no different than trying to impose a content-based
ban on speech. It simply cannot be done.”
More Here
No comments:
Post a Comment
Spammers: You are wasting your time. Irrelevant comments will not be published