Monitoring people's right to effective self-defence..
A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed
HOW ODD THAT MASSACRES MOSTLY HAPPEN IN "GUN-FREE ZONES"! When will the brain-dead Left wake up and draw the obvious conclusion? Gun bans kill kids
Sunday, January 10, 2016
SAF Files Federal Lawsuit Against Oklahoma DHS Over Firearms Prohibition
BELLEVUE, Wash., Jan. 8, 2016 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The Second Amendment Foundation has filed a federal lawsuit against the Oklahoma Department of Human Services (OKDHS) on behalf of two state residents whose civil rights have been deprived under color of law because agency rules prohibit them from acting as foster parents while legally possessing functional firearms for personal protection.
At issue are the rights of Stephen and Krista Pursley. They have been foster parents to 34 children in Oklahoma, providing these youngsters with a stable environment. However, OKDHS "completely prohibits foster and adoptive parents…from the possession of firearms for the purpose of self-defense," the lawsuit alleges.
For almost two years, OKDHS has issued a form to prospective foster and adoptive parents titled Weapon Safety Agreement for Foster or Adoptive Family ("WSA"). It prevents the carrying of firearms in the child's presence "unless the employment of foster/adoptive applicant or parent requires when on-duty."
"This mandate for foster parents is not just restrictive, it's ridiculous," said SAF founder and Executive Vice President Alan M. Gottlieb. "Why should a foster parent be stripped of his or her right to self-defense, or their ability to defend their foster child, simply to appease some bureaucrat's anti-gun philosophy?
"We're in a new era, when people not only must be concerned with violent crime, but also acts of urban terrorism," he added. "How would it look for Oklahoma if foster children came to some harm because OKDHS regulations disarmed their foster parents? We're asking for an injunction against this requirement because it puts foster families at serious risk while denying parents of their constitutional rights."
"It is completely unconstitutional, and unfair," said attorney David G. Sigale, who is representing the plaintiffs, "that those persons who are providing a better life and environment for children, through the State's DHS foster care and adoption process, would have to give up the fundamental rights of self-defense and defense of family in order to do so. If one is in compliance with federal law and the Oklahoma Self-Defense Act, the DHS is not allowed to discriminate against those who foster and adopt through the State programs. The DHS's policy that severely restricts the firearm possession of these good people must be struck down."
SAF and the Pursleys are represented by attorneys David G. Sigale at Law Firm of David G. Sigale, P.C. of Glen Ellyn, Illinois and Jason A. Reese at Meyer, Leonard & Edinger, PLLC of Oklahoma City.
The Second Amendment Foundation (www.saf.org) is the nation's oldest and largest tax-exempt education, research, publishing and legal action group focusing on the Constitutional right and heritage to privately own and possess firearms. Founded in 1974, The Foundation has grown to more than 650,000 members and supporters and conducts many programs designed to better inform the public about the consequences of gun control.
SOURCE Second Amendment Foundation
All about control, controlling "us"!
ReplyDeleteTexas Gov. Greg Abbott calls for Convention of States to take back states' rights
Dallas Morning News - 21 hours ago
http://trailblazersblog.dallasnews.com/2016/01/gov-greg-abbott-calls-for-constitutional-convention-to-take-back-states-rights.html/
On CNN too and a few other sites, Google constitutional convention
Video starts immediately
http://www.cnn.com/2016/01/08/politics/greg-abbott-texas-rubio-constitutional-convention/index.html
The 10th Amendment
https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/tenth_amendment