If you really want to understand how stupid and silly things have gotten in the gun control debate, keep in fact that the Administration is now SIMULTANEOUSLY:
A. Denouncing the availability of SMALL-caliber semi-automatic non-military rifles (e.g., .223 AR-15s) to civilians while
B. Actively selling LARGE-caliber semi-automatic military surplus rifles (e.g., .30-06 M1 Garland's) to civilians.
I'm in favor of the Civilian Marksmanship Program, by which the government sells surplus military rifles to civilians, but if military guns are a problem, why is the government selling them?
Posts
3 comments:
That's alright, they also come in 308.
Please don't spread this around too much. If it gets to the right or wrong people (whichever) all of a sudden it will dawn on them to pull the plug on the sale of surplus arms to the public. You are right in that a 30-06 is a lot more powerful than a .223, but the gun banners don't know that either.
AIB/44
Personally I would be concerned that the weapons may have been weakened or tampered with. there are many ways to destroy a gun and not notice the damage.
Post a Comment