The old media in Florida tried to frame the issue as one of the limiting of Doctor's speech, but it was never about that. The law was in reaction to Doctors inappropriately asking questions about gun ownership, and potentially feeding that information into government databases. This is known as a "boundary violation" where a professional uses his power in inappropriate ways.
The 11th Circuit Cout of Appeals upheld the law yesterday, the 25th of July. It is possible that the rulling will be appealed to the Supreme Court. From the startribune.com, Marion Hammer, a proponent of the law speaks:
"The intent is to protect the privacy of firearms owners and to stop the political interrogation of gun owners and the children of gun owners when they seek medical care," Hammer said in an email.A majority of the judges agreed:
"The act simply codifies that good medical care does not require inquiry or record-keeping regarding firearms when unnecessary to a patient's care," states the opinion written by U.S. Circuit Judge Gerald Tjoflat.From the decision:
The Act seeks to protect patients’ privacy by restricting irrelevant inquiryand record-keeping by physicians regarding firearms. The Act recognizes that when a patient enters a physician’s examination room, the patient is in a position of relative powerlessness. The patient must place his or her trust in the physician’s guidance, and submit to the physician’s authority. In order to protect patients, physicians have for millennia been subject to codes of conduct that define the practice of good medicine and affirm the responsibility physicians bear. In keeping with these traditional codes of conduct—which almost universally mandate respect for patient privacy—the Act simply acknowledges that the practice of good medicine does not require interrogation about irrelevant, private matters.
©2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch