Handguns from an Arizona Turn In Event, 2013 |
In 2013, the Arizona Legislature passed HB 2455, to prevent the destruction of valuable firearms by lower levels of government in the state. No penalties were imposed.
It is not normal for local governments to destroy valuable property, at least not when the property can be legally sold for the public benefit. But in this case, the property was being destroyed for ideological purposes, not for pragmatic ones. The purpose of destroying valuable guns is to send the propaganda message: guns bad.
Some cities, especially Tucson, refused to obey the law.
Now we find the extent of which the City of Tucson has been willing to push their illegal propaganda. From tucson.com:
The Tucson Police Department has destroyed 4,820 guns turned in by residents or seized from crime investigations since the beginning of 2013, city records show.The article gives us more information about the firearms destroyed:
The figure is at the heart of a complaint made by state Rep. Mark Finchem, who is arguing Tucson is violating a 2013 Arizona law that requires the sales of otherwise legal guns obtained by law enforcement agencies.
City policies allow only for rifles that are not semi-automatic and shotguns to be sold at public auction. All handguns and semi-automatic rifles taken in by police are destroyed.As all the firearms destroyed were either handguns or semi-automatic rifles, a reasonable value would be about $200 each. We cannot know the exact value, because the firearms were not put up for auction.
Roughly 86 percent of the guns that were disposed of in the last 3½ years were destroyed, according to documents provided by the Tucson Police Department. Of the remaining 14 percent, half were put up for sale at auction and half were kept for law enforcement purposes.
The city of Tucson destroyed about a million dollars worth of firearms in the last two and a half years.
You might counter that local governments have First Amendment rights to make political propaganda, and to spend money on it as they see fit. No, they do not. From thewashingtonpost.com:
(Note that local governments and state agencies likely have no First Amendment rights against state governments, because the state is entitled to control the conduct of its subdivisions; likewise, federal agencies have no First Amendment rights against the federal government. The question is whether state and local governments, agents of one sovereign, have First Amendment rights against the federal government, another sovereign.)The issue of Tucson flagrantly violating state law is coming to a head. The AG is investigating the City to see if they violated state law. It seems clear they have done so. It remains to be seen if the AG will find it to be true, and if the Treasurer will be required to withhold funds from the city.
©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch
Keep in mind that while the gun grabbers would like to pretend that our numbers are lower, there has been careful analysis is that they are much higher:
ReplyDeleteTotal US Firearms: Not 300 Million, but 412-660 Million?
http://weaponsman.com/?p=33875
You could also estimate that the figure of 120 Million gun owners is also low given recent events.
By now it's more likely to be 130 - 140 Million.
I bought a county gun lot once, took a lot of repair to get my money back. I'm sure they damaged the guns before they were set for bid. only one gun out of the 153 could not be repaired and I used it for parts.
ReplyDeleteAnyone that would damage a gun intentionally should be castrated.
ReplyDelete