From psychcentral.com:
A new study shows that when guns are part of domestic violence, women actually suffer fewer injuries, but experience greater fear.This is consistent with the use of guns in other crimes, and in self-defense. It is not limited to women. Men who are threatened with a gun are also more likely to back down than fight back.
According to a researcher at the University of Pennsylvania, that’s because when a gun enters the situation, women are more likely to back down than fight back.
People who commit robberies with guns instead of other weapons are less likely to physically harm their victims.
People who use guns for self defense are less likely to suffer injuries than people who use other weapons, hands and feet for defense, or who use other strategies.
While Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) is characterized as violence by men against women, the results from the abstract show that there is a substantial amount of violence that is not man on woman. From the study:
Results: Of the 35,413 incidents, 6,573 involved hands, fists, or feet, and 1,866 involved external weapons of which 576 were guns. Most incidents were male-on-female: 63.4% (no weapon), 77.4% (bodily weapon), 50.2% (nongun external weapon), and 79.5% (gun). Guns were used most often to threaten the partner (69.1%). When a gun (vs. bodily or nongun external weapon) was used, IPV victims were less likely to have visible injuries (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.64 and 0.23, respectively)—offenders were less likely to have pushed or shoved, grabbed, punched, or kicked the victim—but (victims) were more likely to be frightened (AOR = 3.13 and 1.49, respectively).These are the incidents that were reported to the police, which may result in selection bias. Men are less likely to seek help for Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) than women are. Numerous studies have shown that women use IPV against men at a rate that is equal or higher than men use IPV against women.
35,413 incidents were studied from the Philadelphia Police Department. 576 of the events with weapons were alleged to involved guns (1.6%).
The incidents and usage are "alleged" because they are based on accounts that were told to officers at the scene by the person described as the victim.
That form included information about what the responding officer saw and did at the scene, as well as a body map to indicate injuries and a place for what Sorenson described as the “narrative,” where officers write in their own words what the victim described happened.These are not adjudicated cases; they are police reports.
While 576 cases were classified as "Guns were used", the data shows 17 cases involved someone being shot. 40 cases involved guns being fired. The gun was used as a blunt instrument in 33 cases. In 187 of the incidents, no gun was seen.
Of 35,413 incidents over three quarters did not involve a weapon or physical attack.
I asked a retired officer if those numbers seemed reasonable. Without hesitation, he said most of the time officers go to domestic violence calls, they are responding to an argument, with no violence involved.
©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.
Gun Watch
I read an FBI report produced by a woman that said the statistics prove the women are the more dangerous and more likely to use a weapon at a much higher percentage rate than men in domestic violence, then they fall back on the poor little me defense. The VAWA, violence against women act used to require the man to be arrested under any circumstances, even if the police determined the woman was the aggressor. it was re written after several years when this became known and well documented. women frequently used a false claim to force the guy out of his own home so the woman could rip him off for valuable items. Divorce is very complicated.
ReplyDeleteGuess who that report said was the highest category of spousal abusers is, male and female law enforcement officers.
ReplyDelete