Monday, October 10, 2016

AzCDL Annual Meeting, 2016 Phoenix, Full House



I attended the Arizona Citizens Defense League annual meeting in Phoenix on Saturday, 8 October, 2016.  It was a 170 mile drive, one way, from Yuma.

Usually I take a friend, but I was slow this year, and the meeting and annual dinner was sold out before I invited anyone.

You can see the crush crowd outside the meeting hall, registering to get in. The majority, about 80%, were openly carrying.

AZCDL is one of the most successful state groups that have organized to restore the right to keep and bear arms.  The group was founded by Fred Dahnke and a small group of activists in 2005.  Fred was an early "Executive Member" of the Virginia Citizen Defense League. He joined it early in 1994 when it was the NVCDL.

Much of the success of AZCDL is from the VCDL model, plus some tweaks learned by Fred and other members from previous organizations. In 2007, AzCDL had 300 members.  In 2016, they have a membership of 14,000.  AzCDL is not a gun club.  It concentrates on legislation and on restoring the right to keep and bear arms.

There was only room for 500 at the annual meeting, which is why it sold out so quickly.  One of those attending was Representative Bob Thorpe, LD 6, Flagstaff. He said this about AzCDL:
"I love the NRA.  They are great folks, but they do not hold a candle to the AzCDL."
AzCDL uses the incremental model, pushing for improvements to existing law while keeping the final goal of complete restoration of the right to keep and bear arms in mind.  Here are some of the accomplishments, from incremental to fundamental, of Az CDL:
  • Lengthening the permit period from 4 years to 5 years.
  • Reduction of the initial 16 hour training requirement to 8 hours.
  • Elimination of the fingerprint and training requirements for CCW permit renewals.
  • Expansion of training experiences that qualify for a CCW permit.
  • Expanding permit eligibility to 19 and 20 year olds with military service.
  • Universal recognition, by Arizona, of concealed weapon/handgun permits held by residents of other states.
  • Preventing law enforcement from confiscating a firearm from someone with a suspended permit if it is otherwise lawfully possessed.
  • Reduction of the penalty for not having your CCW permit in your possession, when required,  from a Class 2 Misdemeanor to a Petty Offense.
  • Constitutional Carry - Restoration of the right of law-abiding adults to carry openly or discreetly without first seeking written permission from the government via a “permit .”
  • Prohibiting state and local government officials from confiscating lawfully held firearms during a state of emergency.
  • Strengthened state preemption of firearm and knife laws.
  • Strengthened protection of the lawful use of firearms, air gun and archery equipment on private lands.
  • Requiring state and local government buildings or events that prohibit weapons to provide temporary and secure storage that is readily accessible on entry and permits immediate retrieval upon exit.
  • Prohibiting the courts from ordering the forfeiture of a firearm when a person is convicted of carrying in a state or local building where weapons are banned.
  • Prohibiting political subdivisions (counties, cities, towns, etc.) from requiring or maintaining de facto registration records of firearms, or their owners, related to the temporary storage process
  • Prohibiting state and local governments from maintaining identifying information of a person who owns, possesses, purchases, sells or transfers a firearm, except in the course of a law enforcement investigation.
  • Preventing private or public employers, property owners, and others from banning firearms in a locked vehicle.
  • Prohibiting firearms seized, abandoned or surrendered from being scrapped.  They must be sold to authorized dealers.
  • Repealing the prohibition on carrying a firearm in a game refuge.
  • Allow possession of otherwise “prohibited” weapon (i.e., for self-defense) while hunting.
  • Expanding the places where a weapon can be carried without a CCW permit in a vehicle to include a “map pocket.” (superseded by Constitutional Carry law).
All of these were gained in the legislature, by hard work and dedicated AzCDL lobbyists, who keep a daily presence there while the legislature is in session.  They plan and build support for legislation long before the legislature meets.

It does not take 14,000 members to enact improvements aimed at restoring the right to keep and bear arms.  Success builds membership, and membership builds success.  There are several states that are lacking an AzCDL or VCDL type organization, and could benefit greatly from one.

The case for restoring the right to keep and bear arms is so strong, logical, and popular, that incremental advances can be won in most states.   What is required is a consistent presence at the capitol, focused on long term goals, backed up by an activist membership. There are numerous groups to use as examples, if the core leadership of a group can be found and organized.  Those groups are willing to share what works.

The activists are there.  They just need to be found and organized. 

Arizona did not start with Constitutional carry.  It took a lot  of hard work and activism to get there.

I am a proud life member of AzCDL.


©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch 


4 comments:

  1. Heller Mcdonald Caetano

    No legislative "successes", just actual successes.

    We have to stop begging legislators to give us what they had no authority to take away from us in the first place.

    I realize that folks long dedicated to the even longer standing legislative snails pace like to champion their individual legislative wins, but they oh so often forget that what made these recent "gains" possible is the judicial remedy that is succeeding where for decade after decade the legislative attempts brought nothing but failure.

    There is no chicken or the egg situation here. These judicial wins provided for the legislative changes, not the other way around.

    ReplyDelete
  2. The bill of rights was ratified in 1791. The Heller opinion was rendered in 2008. I don't know about you, but I'm not willing to wait 217 years for each step towards freedom. AzCDL is doing what it takes!

    ReplyDelete
  3. I could be wrong, it has happened in the past but I cant remember when. I guess I'm too tight fisted to pay dues for exercising a right. If they come for my guns I'll be happy to turn them over when I am out of ammunition.

    ReplyDelete
  4. My point is that I do not have 217 years to get the issues settled. when you are being attacked you do not stop the attack by shooting off the attackers toes one by one while they are shooting to kill. the first correctly placed shot stops the attacker. all of these gun advocacy groups are shooting off toes. If you could make a right turn and get where you are going, you could make a left turn but it may take much longer to get there. too many are making that left turn. the shortest distance between two points is a straight line. demanding the second amendment be enforced as written, nation wide, is that straight line. I can not see paying dues to a group that continually shoots for the toes. How long did it take Europeans to find a western route to China. A lot of people died looking for the northwest passage that would have lived longer using the established routes. the second amendment is established law. It is the route the framers gave us for a secure society. some people fall over board and it is usually their fault. you don't stop drowning by removing the oceans. accidents happen and Sam Colt reduced the occurrence of intentional attacks. if you are armed people think twice about pushing you over board.

    ReplyDelete

Spammers: You are wasting your time. Irrelevant comments will not be published