We are in the middle of another round in the effort to scuttle the
right to keep and bear arms. Justice John Paul Stevens, while on the
Supreme Court and since retirement, has urged interpreting the Second
Amendment as an individual right to keep and bear arms “while in the
militia” or some such. This renders the right empty and ultimately
incoherent. (Try to imagine the right Stevens proposes and you get zero.
As the majority in D.C. v. Heller stated bluntly in 2008, it
is nonsense to talk about a right to keep and bear arms within an
organization from which Congress has plenary authority to exclude you.)
Also jumping into the fray is Michael Waldman, whose “biography” of
the Second Amendment uses the militia conversations during the
ratification debates of the late 1780s to accuse the 20th century
National Rifle Association of inventing the individual right to arms.
There is so much wrong here that it may take several posts to unwind.
This post will focus on the basic mischaracterization of our
constitutional scheme of rights and powers and how unbridled federal
power perverts our conception of rights.
More Here
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment