Wednesday, December 14, 2022

Washington AG files Consumer Protection Lawsuit for Claims of Violation of Magazine Ban

The Attorney General of Washington State, Bob Ferguson, filed a consumer protection lawsuit against Federal Way Discount Guns, claiming the store illegally sold magazines which held more than 10 rounds of ammunition.

It has generally been illegal for anyone to sell magazines which hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition in Washington State, since July 1 of 2022, this year. There are some specific exceptions. The law is being contested in the courts.

From the complaint:

Plaintiff State of Washington, by and through its attorneys Robert W. Ferguson, Attorney General, and Ben Carr, John Nelson, and Bob Hyde, Assistant Attorneys General, brings this action against Defendants Federal Way Discount Guns, LLC, and its owner Mohammed Baghai. The State alleges that Defendants engaged in unfair and deceptive acts or practices, as well as unfair methods of competition, in violation of the Consumer Protection Act, RCW 19.86, and RCW 9.41.375. The State alleges the following on information and belief.

When the law was passed, it contained both a straight criminal statute, RCW 9.41.370, and a peculiar criminal statute which defines the distribution of magazines as an "unfair method of competition" under 9.41.375. This allows a civil suit to be brought, instead of a criminal action. From wa.gov:

RCW 9.41.370

Large capacity magazinesExceptionsPenalty.

(1) No person in this state may manufacture, import, distribute, sell, or offer for sale any large capacity magazine, except as authorized in this section.

 RCW 9.41.375 

Large capacity magazines—Unfair method of competition.

Distributing, selling, offering for sale, or facilitating the sale, distribution, or transfer of a large capacity magazine online is an unfair or deceptive act or practice or unfair method of competition in the conduct of trade or commerce for purposes of the consumer protection act, chapter 19.86 RCW. [2022 c 104 § 4.]

Civil suits are easier to prosecute than criminal cases. In a civil case, the plaintiff only needs to show a "preponderance of the evidence" instead of establishing guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt". 

Washington State provides for jury trials on all civil cases except for traffic infractions.

Official prosecutors are unusual in the law. They have been given almost unlimited immunity from lawsuit themselves by an unprecedented legal decision at the Supreme Court in 1976.  In the case of Imbler v. Pachtman, the Progressive Burger Court declared prosecutors could not be sued.

Prosecutors may lie. They may present false evidence. They may withhold exculpatory evidence. But, according to the decision, no lawsuit can be brought against them.

In the recent Bruen decision at the Supreme Court of the United States of America, Magazine bans, which had been ruled to be constitutionally valid, back to the Third Circuit and the Ninth Circuit. The cases were granted certiorari, vacated by the Supreme Court, and remanded to the two circuits to be reheard, considering the restoration of the protection of the right to keep and bear arms under Bruen. 

It seems likely magazine bans such as the Washington state ban will be found to be unconstitutional under the protections of the Second Amendment.  Court actions are not certain. Some of the courts seem to be playing delaying games, perhaps in the hope of progressive judges replacing those who say the Constitution has to be understood as it was written, when it was ratified.


©2022 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

 

 

 

 

2 comments:

Anonymous said...

Until we get a very conservative Supreme Court restoring the constitution to full power seems a long way off. The useless liberals thing their opinion of what they think it should say are destroying it Only the actual words ratified can be used not interpretation of how they think it reads. Liberal judges should be impeached because they are violating their oath of office with their interpretations.

Anonymous said...

They were legal to manufacture and legal to sell when they were manufactured and sold.The government can stop the manufacture of new ones but they cant out law the ones already owned. Article one section nine item three