Gallego is rated by the NRA as a B+, hardly much of a distinction in Arizona. Wilcox seemed to think that pushing for severe restrictions on peoples' ability to keep and carry firearms would work for her. From Mother Jones:
Wilcox, who was shot in the hip in 1997 by an angry constituent, has kept gun control front and center during the campaign, although not always successfully. She brought up Gallego's vote at a recent debate; in June, her husband, Earl, confronted Gallego at a gun control rally, alleging that he was a "traitor to the cause." Gallego, a former NRA member, has said he brought a handgun to work at the state capitol after receiving threats, but supports a ban on assault rifles and the county buyback program Wilcox helped to start.Wilcox is not known for subtlety. Many have attributed the fact that she was shot directly to her corruption. In any case, her anti-rights attacks on Gallego did not work. She lost the primary yesterday, 26 August, with 36% of the vote. Her major opponent, Gallego, won with 48%. Interesting enough, in this hotly contested election, which essentially decided who will be representing the "safe seventh" district, likely for the rest of their career, only 24,189 people voted.
Being for restrictive gun control did not work for Mary Rose Wilcox. Being perceived as a modestly pro gun rights candidate worked for Ruben Gallego.
©2014 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch
Posts
2 comments:
Can one really consider someone who supports a ban on "assault rifles" as even "modestly pro gun"?
Please don't cherry pick pictures, good or bad. the msm and 2A opposition uses pictures and uses visual juxtaposition to control a narrative. Please, just the facts.
Post a Comment