Monday, April 25, 2016

WI: Win in the Culture War; Switchblade Knives

You are winning the culture war when the other side accepts your premises.  In the 1950's, legislatures across the country succumbed to the latest trendy weapons ban.  Switchblade knives.  The trend went so far as to pass a federal ban on the importation and interstate sale of of switchblades, because, at the time, it was widely understood the Constitution forbade the federal government from actually regulating the sale of an item inside of state boundaries.  Seven states, including Arizona, did not enact a switchblade ban.

The ban never had any facts or logic to back it up.  It was entirely emotion and media driven legislation, based on fear of the "other", in this case, street gangs armed with switchblade knives.  It was a precursor to the the "assault weapon" ban, another fear and emotion based ban with no data to back it up.  The icon of the switchblade ban was "Westside Story", of the "Assault Weapons" ban "Miami Vice".  Both bans were driven by politicians making a name for themselves and a "progressive" media revelling in emotion driven nonsense.  It took the rise of the Internet and 60 years, but Conservatives, Libertarians, and Constitutionalists are winning the culture war on switchblades and weapons in general.

The Milwaukee Journal Sentinel has deep "progressive" roots.  Milwaukee, Wisconsin, has always been a center of "progressive" thought.   A few months ago, Wisconsin passed a repeal of the state ban on switchblades and other knives.  The repeal also placed knives in the state preemption law, so that the laws are uniform throughout the state. 

The repeal of a weapons ban is reliably heralded by "progressive" media with a flurry of articles about how there will be "blood in the streets".

Not this time.  The jsonline article is fact based and lacks emotional content, except for a little expressed by those celebrating this small step toward freedom.  From
To the untrained eye, most switchblades look pretty much like other folding knives. But instead of using two hands, or pulling a blade with a practiced thumb roll, a user need only push a button and the blade either swings out the side or shoots out the front and locks into place.

Better models have safety switches that reduce the chances of the knife opening unintentionally.

Butterfly, or balisong, knives also were considered illegal to carry in many places. They do not have springs but can be opened with one hand, with practice and a little martial arts flourish.

Many state bans — and a federal law that prohibits switchblade sales in interstate commerce, except to law enforcement or military users — go back to the late 1950s and early 1960s. That's when Hollywood turned switchblades into an icon of malevolence.
The article goes on the quote a Milwaukee police officer as saying that the change in law is no big deal.  The major difference, it is noted, is that the police can no longer confiscate such knives when they are found, except if the person carrying them concealed is a felon. 

That is an admission that tens of thousands of Wisconsin citizens have been needlessly harassed, had their property confiscated, been fined and or jailed for the last 60 years.  Most of them were minorities.

Governor Walker accepted a fancy switchblade knife, suitably engraved, at the signing ceremony for the bill.  The knife was presented by Knife Rights, which lobbied for the legislation.  From the article:
Wattenberg is proud of the special work it took to engrave the Seal of Wisconsin onto the blade of the knife presented to Walker.

"We've never had a public official decline an automatic knife, ever," Ritter said. "Everyone wants to own a switchblade."
It is the perfect closing to the victory in the culture war.  From being an icon of evil invented by "progressive" politicians, which went so far as to prompt federal legislation, to "Everyone wants to own a switchblade".

It illustrates the death of a "progressive" article of faith:  There are "progressive" experts who know more than everyone else.  Those experts should decide for everyone else how they should live their lives.

Over and over again, we find that "experts" were self serving con men who sold their "expertise" for personal gain; and the policies they crafted did more harm than good. Transfats, Cholesterol, "Four Food Groups", and Ethanol subsidies come to mind.

Today, we see the same snake oil being peddled by "progressives" on everything from "assault weapons" to "climate change" to "Obamacare" to "Universal Background Checks".  They all claim that "experts" know what is better for us than the people do themselves.  They are all premised on the thought that the "elite" should tell everyone else how to live, that the media should "manufacture consent". And they are all just as false.

©2015 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Who needs a switchblade when a sabre is legal or my bowie knife? Switchblades are a handy tool in times where you only have one hand free while doing your work. My sabre and bowie knife are good for the uses intended but if I am a wireman on a pole a saber may not be the tool I need. any infringement on the right to carry any tool is unconstitutional. Government can not limit the people the people limit the government. Shall not be infringed is exactly what the second amendment means in the most basic terms. Government can not have more powerful weapons than the public that creates an ability to intimidate. when our government was created it had no weapons. When government called up the militia, the militiamen brought their own weapons some carried wood axes some carried knives and some carried the rifles and pistols they had made themselves. they even cast their own shot and made their own powder. Not until the Brown Bess was invented to be mass produced were any weapons parts interchangeable. because most of the weapons were home made. Now you need a government license to make your own weapons. bit by tiny bit the government has increased it power and authority the constitution never gave it the authority to do. You can not grow a garden with out some form of government intrusion. You can not live off the land without permits and licenses. the pioneers would have needed an extra wagon to carry all of the permits that government now requires. If it was not required then it can not be required now. The pioneers came west under the same constitution.