One of Missouri Governor (D) Jay Nixon's most visible actions against Second Amendment rights was his veto of the gun reform bill SB 656. SB 656 contains a number of common sense reforms to restore Second Amendment rights and protections for people who legitimately engage in self defense. From the NRA-ILA:
It is not surprising the former NYC Mayor, Michael Bloomberg would oppose such reforms. He has been adamantly opposed to an armed population his entire career. He has invested tens of millions of dollars in funding anti rights organizations. Some of his money is being used in an attempt to prevent an ovverride of Nixon's veto. Only two years ago, the legislature overrode another veto of a gun reform bill. That bill was also numbered SB 656. An override in the House seems highly likely, so the anti self defense activists are targeting the Senate. From themissouritimes.com:
But in order for the House to get the chance to override the veto, it must clear the Senate. That chamber voted 24-8 along party lines for the bill during session. Opponents must only flip two votes to sustain the veto.Missouri's Fraternal Order of Police and the Missouri Catholic Conference have joined with Bloomberg's organization to lobby to stop the veto override.
That’s where the campaign comes in. Moms Demand Action, a grassroots-style group made up of mothers seeking action on gun control measures (and backed by former New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s Everytown for Gun Safety Action Fund), has launched a social media and phone calling campaign to try to convince senators to vote to sustain the veto.
They’ve been calling their senators and representatives asking them to sustain the veto. They’ve also been aggressively courting the legislators on Twitter, tweeting at them every poll or column or endorsement that shows support for stopping the bill.
Both Democrat and Republican candidates for governor, one of which will replace governor Nixon, have said that they would not have vetoed the bill.
This means that if the override is stopped, a replacement bill is very likely to be passed and signed next session.
An override would make sure that such effort would not be necessary. That is a strong argument to override the veto.
Second Amendment supporters are likely contacting Senators as well. There are usually 3-10 times as many Second Amendment activists as anti- self defense activists. But the Second Amendment supporters do not have the funding of billion air elitists such as Michael Bloomberg.
The veto override will inform us if votes or money wins this contest.
©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.
Gun Watch
2 comments:
Neither votes or money is what is supposed to win this "contest".
Self-Evident, Declared and Constitutionally Codified rights are supposed to do so.
So either way, gun controllers win.
They win because either way, the Second Amendment loses.
Either more wicked gun control is imposed via state usurpation err preemption
or
Inalienable, Creator Endowed rights are open to ingringement via the power of the democratic vote - despite even specific enumeration within the federal Constitution.
We shall see alright, we shall see the outcome of a false premise sold to fish who swallow it all hook line and sinker.....and then wonder why they got caught.
I think we are in a movie script writing era. Maybe I watch to many movies but by now you would think some one some group is plotting to remove people like Soros and Bloomberg and so many of these pushing the corrupt agendas, here and around the world. Hilary gets away with bumping people off all the time the president thinks it is OK to bump people off at his discretion. turning the tables seems to be a fair proposition. the gun grabbers and the NWO'ers are to ignorant to know how many bees are getting into their bonnet. when you stir up hornets expect to get stung. all the security in the world is only as good as the first time it fails. I used to teach electronic warfare security devices. I personally violated the best they had. Neutralized it in ten minutes. One thing I proved was the close mindedness of the government. You have to experience the mini minds of our governments greatest thinkers to appreciate their ignorance. they scraped a fabulous program because of what I did. I would not have been able to get near the device if the monitor had been turned on.
Post a Comment