Three Corpus Christi Police Department SWAT officers were shot Thursday morning while they attempted to serve a search warrant at a suspected drug house on the 3000 block of Churchill Street.
Police said the officers were trying to make entry to the home when someone started firing a gun at them.
Three officers were hit.
Senior Officer Steven Reubelmann, who has been with the department for six years, was shot twice in the wrist and hand.
Officer Andrew Jordan, a four-year veteran, was shot in the upper leg and forearm.
A bullet also grazed Officer Steven Brown's leg.
Small amounts of cocaine, crack cocaine, prescription medications used for anxiety and pain, and some marijuana were found inside. Officers also seized $600 in cash.
Code Enforcement also had to arrange for the water and gas connections to be terminated. According to police the residents were stealing utilities. AEP disconnected the electrical service as the connection was deemed to be unsafe.
The original subject of the warrant, 30-year-old Santiago Garcia, is facing drug possession charges.
After 22 months in jail, on 13 December, 2016, Rosas was acquitted of all charges by a jury of his peers. An unusual instruction by the Judge about prosecutorial misconduct may have had an effect. From kristv.com:
He told the jury that the prosecution had mishandled 22 items of evidence crucial to the case.The defense attorneys say this is not the first time this has been a problem with district attorney Mark Skurka. They said the withholding of evidence had occurred in several other cases. The voters fired Skura and voted in a new district attorney, Mark Gonzalez, who will take office 1 January, 2017.
"The state had constantly refused to hand over evidence material to the defense," Judge Williams said.
That is called spoliation of evidence. Under the Michael Morton Act, prosecutors in Texas are required to share all evidence with the defense before a criminal trial starts.
However in Rosas' case, some evidence was not preserved, and other evidence was not handed over in time for trial.
After the trial, the jurors spoke with the defense attorneys. Here are some of the reasons given for the acquittal. From mimesislaw.com:
Afterward, the jury talked to the attorneys and the following issues came out:These sort of cases are happening with greater frequency. The number of "no knock" raids has shot up dramatically. Cases like this fuel the call for reform.
- The officers were not credible, their stories didn’t match
- The fact that the flash-bang is designed to disorient and distract, which it did
- That there was no video from body cams or vehicles
- That the police did not conduct pre-raid surveillance
- That Rosas was indicted for an assault committed by an officer
- That the officer wasn’t also indicted
- That the prosecutor dismissed half of the charges in the middle of the trial
No knock raids should have a very limited role in law enforcement.
©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch