Saturday, January 07, 2017

Bill Introduced to Repeal Gun-Free School Zones Federal Law



Representative Thomas Massie, (R) KY, has re-introduced a bill to repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA) of 1990 and its amendments.  It was found unconstitutional in 1995 in U.S. v Lopez. Then it was passed again, slightly modified, under pressure of President Bill Clinton and the establishment media in 1996. Donald Trump has pledged to eliminate Gun Free Zones, but he will need Congressional help for the GFSZA.  The bill is numbered HR 34 for the 2017-18 Congress. Progress on the bill can be seen at congress.gov.

Representative Massie issued a press release on Thursday, January 5th. From massie.house.gov:
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Monday, U.S. Representative Thomas Massie (R-KY) introduced H.R. 34, the Safe Students Act, which would repeal the Gun-Free School Zones Act of 1990.

The bill, originally introduced by Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX) in 2007, repeals the Gun-Free School Zones Act (GFSZA) of 1990, which makes it “unlawful for any individual knowingly to possess a firearm at a place that the individual knows, or has reasonable cause to believe, is a school zone.” In 1995, the Supreme Court held the GFSZA unconstitutional, which prompted Congress to amend the bill in 1996. The Supreme Court has not ruled on the constitutionality of the amended Act.

“Gun-free school zones are ineffective. They make people less safe by inviting criminals into target-rich, no-risk environments,” said Massie. “Gun-free zones prevent law-abiding citizens from protecting themselves, and create vulnerable populations that are targeted by criminals.”

The Safe Students Act has garnered the support of three major gun organizations: National Association for Gun Rights, Gun Owners of America, and the National Rifle Association.

Representative Massie concluded: “A bigger federal government can’t solve this problem. Weapons bans and gun-free zones are unconstitutional. They do not and cannot prevent criminals or the mentally ill from committing acts of violence. But they often prevent victims of such violence from protecting themselves.”
 There is no indication that the GFSZA has been effective in any way other than as propaganda demonizing guns and gun owners. Mass school shootings have dramatically increased after passage of the act.  Federal prosecutors seem leery of bringing charges for fear of another Supreme Court fight. The first battle took place before U.S. v. Heller or McDonald, both seminal Second Amendment cases.  It is hard to believe that a blanket ban on possessing arms outside the home within 1,000 feet of a school would pass Constitutional muster, given a Trump replacement for Justice Scalia.

 ©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.

Link to Gun Watch


2 comments:

Paul Weber said...

It's a good start. It will be ideal once we get back to "Constitutional Carry" (i.e. the 2nd Amendment as written) across the whole country.

Anonymous said...

.
��Look, this is easy: if the left's lips are moving, they are apparently lying or deluded.

The Trumponian Message Is: Don't listen to them; don't look at them; don't BUY ANYthing they are selling.

Don't buy their CDs, don't buy the products they hawk on TV, don't go to their inane movies, don't visit their stupid sites, don't listen to them on the radio.

Don't watch them on their Fake News TV, don't buy tickets to see them do ANYthing, and especially don't watch their dumb, leftist-activist, TV "shows."

If they are among the low-life, scheming, oily, lying, Schumer-type, lib politicians, defund them, block their plots, "find them, fix them in place, isolate them, and ridicule them." (To paraphrase their own leader, Saul Alinksky)

Think, you might actually wipe them out financially or have them praising Trump in about 6 weeks? ����
.
How about maybe you pass this idea on and forward?
.
.