In July, a Colorado federal district court struck down a U.S. Postal Service
regulation barring a rural man from possessing a firearm in his car
when he parks in the post office parking lot to retrieve and send his
mail. The news made headlines across the country as one of the first
favorable federal court rulings after President Obama declared war on
the Second Amendment in the wake of the Newtown, Conn., school shootings
tragedy.
Tab Bonidy drives miles from his home to collect his mail in Avon, but because he regularly carries a concealed handgun pursuant to Colorado law, he is barred by a Postal Service
regulation, adopted in 1972, from parking in the post office parking
lot and entering the building itself. In 2010, after landmark rulings by
the Supreme Court of the United States in District of Columbia v. Heller and McDonald v. City of Chicago, Mr. Bonidy asked the Postal Service
whether he would be prosecuted if he carried his firearm into the post
office or locked it in his vehicle in the post office parking lot. The Postal Service’s
top lawyer wrote back that “carrying firearms, openly or concealed,
onto any real property under the charge and control of the Postal Service” is still barred by Postal Service regulation.
On two separate occasions, the district court denied attempts by the U.S. Department of Justice to dismiss Mr. Bonidy’s lawsuit, and during oral arguments, sharply challenged the federal lawyer’s assertion that the Avon Post Office parking lot is a “sensitive” place that allows the Postal Service
to curtail Second Amendment rights. Then, last month during oral
arguments on cross motions for summary judgment, the judge upbraided the
federal lawyer, saying, “There’s a difference between all of this
broad, general restriction and an individual situation . You know, this
is more of what we are seeing — regulatory authority prevails, period.
It isn’t going to happen [here].”
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment