Wednesday, October 09, 2019

Supreme Court Announcement on Mootness of NYSR&P Second Amendment Case likely on 7 October

On 1 October, 2019, the Supreme Court held a conference. One of the items to be decided was whether the Court would hear the Second Amendment case of NY STATE RIFLE & PISTOL V. NEW YORK, NY.

The Supreme Court had already granted Cert (agreed to hear the case). But the City of New York, fearing a poor outcome, had minimally changed the regulation, and lobbied the State of New York legislature to minimally change the law. Then the counsel for the City filed a petition with the Supreme Court, claiming the case was moot, there was no longer any valid reason to pursue the lawsuit.

The plaintiffs disagreed. They argued the changes were minimal and done to evade adhering to the Second Amendment.

The Supreme Court web site shows the  New York case as being scheduled for oral arguments on 2 December, 2019.  This may simply be part of the Court's administrative procedures. The court is the smallest of the three branches of the federal government. It is jealous of its power. The court guards its inner workings from the public view.

There are several cases important to the Second Amendment working their way toward a Supreme Court decision. Many of the lower courts have been hostile to restoring Second Amendment rights.

The lower courts have refused to protect the right to keep and bear arms outside the home.

The lower courts have refused to protect the right to keep and bear commonly owned rifles, magazines, and accessories.

The lower courts have refused to protect the commercial sale of arms, and the private sale of arms.

The lower courts have done this with sophistry and the changing of definitions to prevent the exercise of Second Amendment rights.

Many believe the Supreme Court did not accept these cases, because neither the originalists and textualists on the Supreme Court (Thomas, Scalia, Alito, and Roberts) or the "living document" progressives (Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan) could depend on what the swing vote, Justice Kennedy, would do. So, they mostly did nothing for ten years.

Justice Kennedy has been replaced by Justice Kavanagh.  With Justice Gorsuch replacing Justice Scallia, the originalists and textualists should have a working majority.  Justice Roberts appears to be stepping into Justice Kennedy's role as a swing vote, but the swing has moved a bit toward originalist thinking. 

Other cases likely to come up, depending on what happens with the New York Case, are Rogers v. Grewal,  Cheeseman v. Polillo, and Remington v. Soto.

Remington is about the protections afforded by the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, the PLCAA. Remington is scheduled for the conference on 11 October; the Court may decide to hear the case at that conference.

Rogers is about the carry of arms outside the home in New Jersey, as is Cheesman, but from a bit different angle.

Cheesman is scheduled for the 18 October, 2019 Supreme Court conference, which will likely determine if the court will decide to hear the case.

Some writers believe the Democrats have pushed the Court too hard, with barely disguised threats to pack the court.

The odds are we will know if the Court will hear oral arguments in the NY STATE RIFLE & PISTOL V. NEW YORK, NY. case Monday morning, the 7th of October, 2019.

It is difficult to know what the Supreme Court will do, particularly in Second Amendment cases.

©2019 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Frankly I'm not pleased with the U.S. Supreme courts actions for many cases. Read the historical record and find numerous politically motivated rulings that are not constitutional. I believe the court destroyed the rule of law in 1803 and has steadily lost integrity ever since By numerous other rulings the court has embarrassed its self many times. Congress has the authority to hold the court accountable but never has. Courts do not make law, they define the constitutionality of law. Sorry but I'm a constitutional original intent textualist. the closer we stay to original intent the better the constitution works fore every one. You don't have to like guns but you better learn about them, You could get drafted. You don't have to like what I say or how I say it, but try to stop me and you might get you six dusted with a boot. Freedom Of religion is a long discussion but the framers were only considering the various sects of the Christian religion. Many religions are not recognized as religions but are political cults. This nation was founded on and dedicated to the Christian religion's God.