Saturday, May 02, 2026

FPC Lawsuit Forces Pennsylvania State Police to Drop 80% Receiver Policy

 

In the six year old case of Landmark v. Evanchick, in Pennysylvania, the Firearms Policy Coalition has been vindicated. A settlement has been reached. The Pennsylvania State Police has agreed to revoke the policy of the Pennsylvania State Police to the effect that partially-manufactured frames, receivers and kits, often referred to as 80% frames and receivers, were firearms which required a background check through an FFL before purchase.

The case started six years ago, on December 16, 2019. Then Attorney General of Pennsylvania, Josh Shapiro issued an opinion which classified 80% receivers the same as functional firearms. Just four days later, on December 20, 2019, Firearms Policy Coalition filed a lawsuit against the Pennsylvania Police, who had stated they would accept the opinion of the Attorney General in their policies. On January 21, 2020, Judge Brobson of Pennsylvannia's Commenwealth Court issued an order preventing the enforcement of the policy.  On April 21, 2022, the court issued an order granting a stay pending Pennsylvania State Police pomulgation of new regulations, to be based on new federal regulations.

The parties entered into attempts to resolve the matter amicably. On February 23, 2026, they jointly petitioned the court, agreeing to the following:

  • The matter is now moot.
  • The preliminary injunction can be dissolved
  • The parties shall bear their own costs
  • The matter can be discontinued without prejudice.

In addition, the parties agreed:

This stipulation does not alter the Pennsylvania State Police’s obligation to comply with any and all federal requirements as a point-of-contact state for NICS.

On March 6, 2026, the Court issued an order directing the following:

 1. The preliminary injunction issued pursuant to this Court’s January 31, 2020 Opinion and Order is hereby dissolved and the Prothonotary is ordered to return the cost bond, in the amount of $100.00, to counsel for Petitioners Landmark Firearms LLC, US Rifle, LLC, Polymer80, Inc., and Firearms Policy Coalition, Inc.;

2. The Parties shall bear their own costs, expenses, and attorney fees in this matter; and

3. The Prothonotary shall mark this matter discontinued without prejudice.

The case is now ended. The Pennsylvania State Police have not required firearms made with "80%" receivers to be sold only with serial numbers and only through Federal Firearms Dealers in the State of Pennsylvania for the last six years.

The rule promoted under the Biden Administration was upheld as acceptable under the  Administrative Procedure Act. The rule was not challenged under the Second Amendment.  In the future, much depends on what new rule is promoted by the ATF in the Trump administration on what is considered a firearm.

Analysis: Firearms have been made at home by individuals since before the colonies became the United States of America. The ATF argued that technological changes have made the selling of kits which can be made into functional firearms as quickly as firearms can be legally purchased renders those kits the same as functional firearms. Such argument was under the Biden administration. The ATF is to come up with a new rule under the Trump administration. The key appears to be what the definition of "readily convertible" will mean in the law. This correspondent's best guess would be something to the effect of "If the kit can be assembled into a functional firearm in less than two hours by an ordinary individual with commonly available tools, it is "readily convertible".  Many other possibilities exist.

 ©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.
Gun Watch
  


TX: Houston - Robbery Attempt , Suspect Shot

Authorities said the two individuals had recently met and were traveling together in the shooter’s vehicle after meeting to produce social media content.

“A 911 caller reported that he shot a male who allegedly tried to rob him and we received multiple calls for service about the incident,” said Harris County Sheriff’s Office Major Ben Katrib.

Authorities said the two individuals had recently met and were traveling together in the shooter’s vehicle after meeting to produce social media content.

During the encounter, investigators said the passenger pulled out a firearm and shot the suspect while still in the vehicle.

The alleged robber suffered a gunshot wound to the upper torso and was transported to a hospital for treatment.


More Here

SC: Columbia - Gunfight, Victim and Suspect both Injured

CPD said the shooting happened Thursday at 2102 Bailey Street, near the Colony Apartments complex. Officers were dispatched in response to a shots-fired call.

While officers were en route, the call was updated to indicate people had been shot.

James-Everette reportedly fired a handgun, striking a victim in the shoulder. The victim fired back and struck James-Everette in the leg.

The suspect and the victim were taken to Prisma Health for treatment.


More Here

Friday, May 01, 2026

President Trump's Second Amendment Accomplishments Second Term

 

President Trump with Pen, Public Domain   

Some Second Amendment supporters claim President Trump has not done anything in support of Second Amendment rights. They say: The ATF still exists! The National Firearms Act of 1934 has not been repealed! The Gun Control Act of 1968 has not been repealed! 

Those actions are not withing the ability of the President of the United States to accomplish by executive action. A very slim majority of Republicans exists in the House. Less than the 60 votes needed to overcome the filibuster exists in the Senate. This means statutory change is very difficult to accomplish. A few members of the Republican party in the House and in the Senate are not reliable supporters of the Second Amendment. Such numbers are all it takes to make passage of legislation extremely difficult. 

In the face of such difficulties, President Trump has accomplished significant positive change in his second term, in just the first 16 months. President Trump has become the President most supportive of the Second Amendment since the founding fathers. 

It is not surprising the Republic did not see any significant challenge to rights protected by the Second Amendment until a generation after the ratification of the Bill of Rights.  A couple of laws restricting concealed carry were passed in 1813. The Kentucky law was struck down as unconstitutional by the state supreme court, leaving the Louisiana law as an outlier for another decade. After the Founding generation had passed away, the infringements on the Second Amendment started being passed.

Here are some of the actions the Trump Administration has taken to restore Second Amendment rights in the United States. Two are statutory. The rest have been done with administrative authority. 

January 20, 2025 - President Trump administration shuts down White House Office of Gun Violence Prevention.  This office was a hotbed of anti-Second Amendment activism. 

February 7, 2025 - President Trump issues executive order to protect Second Amendment rights.    White House link

April 7, 2025 - Trump DOJ repeals Zero Tolerance policy by the ATF.  The ATF announces plans to revise the policy on stabilizing braces and the definition of "engaged in the business by ATF. 

July 4, 2025 - (Statutory) Trump administration passes Big Beautiful Bill ending taxes for silencers, short barreled rifles, short barreled shotguns and any other weapons.  This was the first time any of the NFA taxes were eliminated. The item should have been removed from the NFA, as the Trump administration proposed. The Senate Parliamentarian prevented their complete removal. 

July 21, 2025 -  President Trump administration plans to create process for people to regain Second Amendment rights.  

August 7, 2025 - President Trump bans banks from discriminating against gun companies.  

August 15, 2025 - President Trump administration streamlines carry permit process for D.C

October 10, 2025 - President Trump administration files lawsuit against Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department for denial of Second Amendment rights.  

October 10, 2025 - President Trump has Jennifer Mascott confirmed to Third circuit Court of appeals.  Judge Mascott is likely to be a critical voice in a Second Amendment case. 

September 30, 2025 - President Trump administration recinds Biden administration  export restrictions on  Firearms.  

November 6, 2025 -President Trump cuts off federal funding to gun control groups

November 8, 2025 - Trump's U.S. Attorney for D.C. will refuse to seek felony charges for unregistered rifles or shotguns in D.C.

November 17, 2025 - (Statutory) President Trump gets law passed Protecting Second Amendment  rights of  veterans from the Veterans Administration.  

January 8, 2026  - President Trump DOJ submits brief against California background check for ammunition.   

Jan 13, 2026 - President Trump pulls U.S. out of UN Register of Conventional Arms

January 28, 2025.   President Trump  DOJ files Brief in Massachusetts handgun roster case, taking the side of the Second Amendment. 

April 3, 2026 - Secretary of War Pete Hegseth's order to allow military members to carry off duty on post

President Trump and his administration has done more for Second Amendment supporters than any administration since the founding fathers. At the same time, President Trump is doing more for the USA than any other President, probably at least since World War II. The above is not a complete list. There have been several amicus briefs filed in Second Amendment cases, by the administration, to restore Second Amendment rights. Feel free to add any you know of in the comments.  

When a fundamental constitutional right has been trampled in the dirt for over a hundred years, it is understandable for supporters to be anxious to see the right completely restored, immediately. Unfortunately, such is impossible without destroying the structure of the Republic inherent in the ordered liberty of the Constitution. If the Constitution is destroyed, the Second Amendment is not guaranteed. 

 ©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch
 

 

WA: Kent - 1 of Home Invaders Shot by Homeowner

According to investigators, residents inside the home reported several armed suspects entered the home and the homeowners shot at the intruders, hitting one of the suspects several times. 

The suspect was taken to Harborview Medical Center in critical condition. Kent police have not released the identity of the suspect who was shot. 


More Here

Thursday, April 30, 2026

GA: Atlanta - Gunfight At MARTA Station Initiator Killed

Detectives obtained CCTV footage from the MARTA bus that showed two masked individuals, including the victim, 16-year-old Xavier Wright, getting off the bus.

Before exiting, the warrants state that both the suspect and the other person looked out the window toward three men walking toward the bus loop.

 As Wright and the other unknown masked man got off the bus, detectives say gunfire was exchanged immediately. 

Warrants state that Wright appeared to initiate the gunfire, and one of the three men returned fire.

More Here

Wednesday, April 29, 2026

NY: Yonkers - 17-Year-Old Armed with Knife Shot by Off Duty Female State Trooper

Authorities said the trooper, a female member of Troop NYC, was refueling her vehicle when the teen approached her, took out a knife, and got into the driver’s seat of her car. 

The trooper then fired a single shot from her off-duty firearm, striking the suspect in the left arm. The bullet continued into his chest, police said. 


More Here

TN: Memphis - Man found Dead May have been Attempting Robbery

Officers located a man who was pronounced dead at the scene.

No other injuries were reported.

More Here

PA: Birmingham - Security Guard Shoots Man at Greyhound Station

A fight Sunday afternoon at the downtown Greyhound Intermodal Facility ended with a security guard fatally shooting a man, Birmingham police said.

The Jefferson County Coroner’s Office identified the victim as Angelo Herbert Hill Jr. He was 46 and lived in Valdosta.


More Here

Review of Pistols, Crime, and Public: Safety in Early America by Clayton Cramer

Queen Ann's type flintlock pistol circa 1740, courtesy Rock Island Auctions


Pistols were commonly owned in America at the time of the Revolution. Clayton Cramer & Joseph Edward Olson lay out extensive evidence in their paper.

This correspondent has noted numerous people make the claim pistols were not common at the time of the American Revolution. This is done to imply concealed arms were not included in the Right to Keep and Bear Arms. Clayton Cramer and Joseph Edward Olson published a paper laying out the extensive evidence of pistol ownership at the time of the American revolution. The paper was published in the Willamette Law Review dated June 3, 2008, pages 699 - 722.

In early America, pistols were distinguished from guns or firearms. The literary separation of pistols from guns and firearms continued in common usage until 1828. One of the most telling pieces of evidence showing the commonality of pistols is the accounting of the weapons turned in to General Gage after the battles of Lexington and Concord occurred on April 19, 1775. On April 23, 1775, General Gage offered to allow Boston residents to leave, *if* they surrendered their arms. Boston, through the selectmen, voted to accept the offer. By April 27 the people had delivered over 3,400 weapons. From the paper:

 As an incentive, General Gage offered passes to leave Boston to all who turned in their weapons, because no weapons or ammunition were allowed to leave Boston. On April 27th, the people delivered to the selectman 1778 fire-arms, 634 pistols, 973 bayonets, and 38 blunderbusses.

Other than the bayonets, pistols were over 25% of the weapons turned in. This was probably an undercount, because pistols are easier to hide than the other weapons. After telling the Bostonians the weapons would be returned to them, General Gage confiscated them some months later.

The paper goes on to show numerous examples of pistols being offered for sale, pistols in estates, pistol powder for sale, and remnants of pistols found from the era.

In addition, at least one law exempted pistols from regulation of long guns, opposite of what is generally seen today.  Boston banned people from leaving unattended loaded firearms in buildings, because of fire hazards. There was no law banning the carry of loaded firearms. The usage of the time separated firearms from pistols. The ban may not have included a prohibition on leaving loaded pistols in houses. Pocket pistols were mentioned in an account from 1772. There were many concealable arms during the revolutionary period. No evidence of laws against the carry of concealed weapons has been found from this period.

The paper is worth reading for any Second Amendment supporter. It shows handguns were in common use at the time of the revolution, and into the early Republic. Clayton Craymer is well known for his meticulous historical research.

Pistols, while not as common as long guns during the American revolution, were common and readily used.  The story of Samuel Whittemore during the battle of Lexington and Concord is an illustration. From warhistoryonline.com:

 Samuel Whittemore learned of the British attack and armed himself with his prized sword and pistols, grabbed his trusty musket, and went to defend his home. By this point, Whittemore was at least 78, possibly as old as 80. He found a position to hide and observe the British advance and when they got close enough he revealed himself and shot one of the soldiers at nearly point blank range. With no time to reload Whittemore drew his pistols and killed two more soldiers.

Whittemore was shot, clubbed, and bayoneted at least 13 times. Against all odds, he survived and lived for two more decades.

Modern handguns were estimated to be 27% of the privately owned firearms held in the United States in 1945, according to the figures in Gary Kleck's highly acclaimed book, Point Blank. As America has become more urban, handguns have become more popular.  In 2023, handguns made up 54% of the firearms added to the private stock in the USA that year.

 

©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.
Gun Watch
   

 

 

 

 



 

 

 

 

 

PA: Philadelphia - Gunfight with Bouncer, Male refused to drop Gun, was Shot, Killed

The second shooting happened on the 3900 block of Frankford Ave just a few minutes after. In this case a male was in a speakeasy and got into an argument outside with a bouncer. That argument was heated and the male pulled a gun on the security guard. This guard then pulled is own weapon .

The guard told the male to drop his gun and when he reused to do so, the guard opened fire, shooting the male at least three times. It is unknown if the male got off any shots at the guard. Police said at least 70 shots were fired.


More Here

TN: Nashville - Carjacker gunfight, Carjacker Shot, Killed, Victim Wounded

According to police, a 44-year-old DoorDash delivery driver had picked up an order from a nearby restaurant and was walking back to his parked Dodge Charger when a gunman approached and demanded the car.

Investigators said the driver retrieved a pistol from inside the Charger. The suspect then shot the driver in the leg.

Police said the driver returned fire, fatally wounding the suspect.


More Here

AZ: Phoenix - Man Smashes Cars, is Shot, Killed

Police said Bruce Roanhorse, 43, was driving just after 4 a.m. in the area near Seventh Street on Alice Avenue, south of Dunlap Avenue, when he hit several parked cars and other property.

A nearby homeowner and his adult son went outside to see the commotion, and then the son went into his parked truck. Roanhorse put his truck in reverse and tried to hit the other truck with the son inside, police said.

That’s when the son shot and killed Roanhorse, police said. The shooter was questioned and later arrested for an outstanding felony warrant. 

More Here 


Monday, April 27, 2026

FL: Miramar - Domestic Defense? Man shoots Woman, Cooperates with Police

Miramar Police spokesperson Janice McIntosh said officers at the scene encountered a second person, a male, who was with the woman in the apartment and was cooperating with the investigation.

"They are actually known to each other and we are just trying to piece, put together what is happening and our detectives are still on scene," McIntosh said.

The man, who lives at the apartment, is believed to have shot the woman, officials said


More Here

TX: Corpus Christi - Shooting may have been Defensive

A witness who remained at the scene said the male in the red hoodie, later identified as Anthony Rodriguez "was challenging the males to fight while he was trying to reach into the food truck."

The witness stated the employees at the food truck "shut the window to the register and Anthony tried to open it again. [The witness] told me she observed one of the employees, who was later determined to be Sebastian, holding a handgun that was in his waistband. Lesdy looked down at her phone and heard the gunshot."

The witness says she looked up and saw Anthony fall, then both employees exited the food truck and called 911.


More Here

TX: Brownwood - Wife Assaults Husband's Girfriend, Shoots Self in Foot

Upon arrival and initial investigation, officers learned that a male subject had arrived at the location with his girlfriend in a vehicle.  Shortly thereafter, the male’s wife arrived and became upset upon discovering him with another woman.  The wife began physically assaulting the girlfriend, who was seated in the passenger seat of the vehicle.

During the altercation, the girlfriend produced a firearm and attempted to strike the wife with it. In the process, the firearm discharged, resulting in the girlfriend sustaining a gunshot wound to the foot. The male subject subsequently fled the scene with the injured female and transported her to a local hospital. He then left the hospital and was later located by officers at another convenience store in south Brownwood.


More Here

Sunday, April 26, 2026

Handguns Used in Defense Against Bears: How many Shots?

In the ongoing study of how effective handguns are when used as a defense against bears, there are over two hundred documented cases. Of those, 184 involve only handguns. The others are combination situations where other deadly force was used in addition to handguns. Of the 184 cases 161 include information about the number of shots fired. In 23 cases the number of shots is not known.

The data is likely skewed by unavoidable selection bias. The data is limited to cases which are documented. There is a strong selection bias against cases which do not involve dramatic outcomes or human injury, or which happen far from any civil authority. Those cases are not likely to be reported or recorded in a way which is accessible. Consider a hypothetical:

A bear acts aggressively toward a person who is hiking. Not wanting to kill the bear, for whatever reason, they fire a warning shot or shots. The bear runs off. There is very little drama, almost no news value, and virtually no reason to report the incident to any authority. There is a strong selection bias against successful uses of warning shots.

One way to guard against selection bias is to include every documented case where a handgun was fired in defense against a bear. This  policy was formulated at the beginning of this study and is in effect.

Of the 161 cases where a handgun has been fired in defense against a bear or bears, and the number of shots is known or reasonably inferred, the distribution of the number of shots fired per case is as follows:

1 shot - 46 cases or 28.6% of the cases where the number of shots is known. 8 cases involved a warning shot. One of the warning shots killed a bear. In one case where one shot was fired, killing the bear, two warning shots were fired with a .22 rimfire rifle. Those shots were not effective. It was decided to include that case with other cases where only one shot was fired from a handgun. The other six warning shot cases were successful.

2 shots - 22 cases or 13.7%. There were 13 cases where warning shot(s) were fired. In seven cases, the warning shots were successful, at least temporarily. In eight cases, the warning shots were unsuccessful. There were three cases where the warning shots were both successful (temporarily) and unsuccessful. In one case it could not be determined if the the shots were effective in stopping the bear; in one case the warning shots were not effective, and no bear or human was injured. Because the warning shots were ineffective, the case, involving a .44 magnum and a polar bear is one of the four failures of the firing of a handgun in defense against a bear or bears.

3 shots - 19 cases or 11.8%. Warning shots were fired in 6 cases. The warning shots were successful in three cases and did not work in three cases. There was one failure, where three shots fired from a .357 magnum did not stop the attack by a grizzly bear. It is likely the bear was not hit.

4 shots - 13 cases or 8.1%. Two cases involved two handguns. Warning shots were fired in four cases. 1 warning shot worked for a while. Warning shot failed in all four cases.

5 shots - 16 cases or 9.9%. Warning shots were fired in four cases. The warning shots worked in two cases, one temporarily, and failed in three cases. There was one case where it could not be determined if the handgun shots stopped the attack, and 1 failure with a .38 caliber revolver and a black bear.

6 shots - 14 cases or 8.7%. Warning shots were fired in five cases. They worked in four cases and did not work in two cases. 1 warning shot worked temporarily. One case was a failure against a polar bear with a .22 rimfire handgun.

Six shots or fewer were fired in 80.1% of known documented cases.  There have not been any documented failures were more than six shots were fired.

7 shots - 9 cases or 5.6%. Warning shots were fired in two cases. One worked, one did not work.

8 shots - 7 cases or 4.3%.  One case involved two handguns. No cases where warning shots were fired.

9 shots - 3 cases or 1.9%. No cases involved warning shots.

10 shots - 5 cases or 3.1%. Warning shots fired in one case. The warning shots did not work.

12 shots - 2 cases or 1.2%, no warning shots fired.

15 shots - 1 case or .6%, no warning shots fired.

16 shots - 1 case, no warning shots, two handguns involved.

18 shots - 1 case, no warning shots fired.

19 shots - 1 case, no warning shots, three handguns involved.

21 shots - 1 case, no warning shots, three handguns involved.

31 shots - 1 case, no warning shots, two handguns involved.

There were no cases involving 11 shots, 13, 14, 17, 20, 22-30 shots ,or more than 31 shots in the cases documented as of this writing.

There were 23 cases where the number of shots was not reported. Two of those cases involved two handguns. Four involved warning shots. 1 warning shot worked, two did not work, the effect of the warning shot(s) was unknown in one case.

©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch
 


 

FL: Miami - Domestic Defense, 75-Year-Old Father Shoots, Kills 47-Year-Old Son

The shooting happened shortly before 5 p.m. Wednesday at a home in the area of Southwest 168th Street and Southwest 92nd Avenue.

Miami-Dade Sheriff's Office officials said 47-year-old David Dylan McPeck was shot and killed by 75-year-old David Ronald McPeck.

Officials said there were mental health issues involved and the incident is currently being treated as self-defense.

More Here

Saturday, April 25, 2026

Handguns were common during the American Revolution

 

 Flintlock pistol from about 1730, courtesy Rock Island Auctions

 

During and after the American revolution, there was no registration of firearms in the colonies which were to become the United States. There is good evidence handguns were commonly owned during this period. One of the primary sources comes from records during the occupation of Boston by General Gage before and after the battles of Lexington and Concord. The history of these engagements were meticulously recorded by Richard Frothingham in the History of the Siege of Boston, published in 1873. Frothingham uses original sources, particularly of the Boston Town Meeting Minutes of 22-28 April, 1775, for the numbers of weapons.

After the disastrous battles at Lexington and Concord, which are considered the start of the American revolution, General Gage was besieged in Boston. There were about 5,000 inhabitants  in the city. Food was running short in Boston. Many people wished to leave. General Gage made a deal with the Selectmen. People could leave the city *if* the inhabitants surrendered their weapons to the town council. They were to identify themselves so the weapons could be returned later. People leaving the city were thoroughly searched.  Even small amounts of food, such as a loaf of bread, were confiscated. It would have been difficult to smuggle out even handguns. It is possible some weapons might have been left hidden in the city.

 

Page 94 from image 118 Frothingham  image

The agreement was for "the inhabitants in general", so it was to encompass all the inhabitants, who were not under the control of General Gage. We have the number of the arms which were turned in.

From Frothingham image 119, page 95.

 

The total number of firearms were 1778 fire-arms plus 634 pistols and 38 blunder-busses or 2,450 total, about one for every two inhabitants. Pistols were almost 26% of the total. This is obviously common, about one for every eight people. All firearms were more expensive in relative terms than they are in the United States in the twenty-first century.  The cost of a pistol in 1776 is difficult to find, with the suggestion common flintlock pistols were about 1.7 British lbs, or roughly two weeks of skilled labor. When the American dollar came into being  there were 20 dollars per ounce of gold and 4.25 British lbs per ounce of gold, or about 8 silver dollars per flintlock pistol. The term "buck" came from one deerskin being worth about 1 dollar. There are about 540 million privately owned firearms for about 340 million people in the USA, or about 1.6 firearms for every person. It is likely firearms were more common in rural areas and on the frontier. An analysis of Plymouth Colony probate inventories during the 1670s showed 13% of the firearms were pistols.

Analysis: It is the experience of this correspondent that firearms, especially handguns, are often taken from an estate before probate, by members of the family. They are frequently given to heirs before death. The numbers from probate records are very likely considerably lower than numbers owned by the population.  The records from the siege of Boston and the probate records show concealable firearms were commonly owned during the immediate period leading up to the ratification of the Constitution. Handguns were not considered "dangerous and unusual weapons". As noted previously, concealed weapons, of which handguns are only one type, were common in the colonies and the early Republic.

 ©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch
 

 

 

 

 

 

TN: Memphis - Shots Fired at Convenience Store, Fire Returned from Tire Store Next Door

The injured suspect was transported by Memphis Fire Department to Regional One in critical condition.

Officers also spoke with the injured suspect’s girlfriend, who said her boyfriend was pumping gas when he began arguing with about 5 men. One of the men said he was going to get his gun and started shooting.

Officers spoke with the owner of the tire shop, who said that approximately 2 shots were fired from the gas station parking lot and that a customer got out of his vehicle and returned fire.

 

More Here

OR: Medford - Man Using an AXE to Break In Shot by Apartment Resident

According to the Medford Police Department, officers responded around 4:55 a.m. to a report of a person in mental distress. A caller reported that a neighbor in an adjacent apartment was screaming and behaving erratically.

While officers were heading to the scene, they learned the person was trying to break into a neighboring apartment using an axe. The person inside that apartment fired a gun, hitting the man.


More Here

Friday, April 24, 2026

Police Murders Drop in 2025, First Quarter of 2026



In 2025, the number of officers feloniously killed each year has dropped to the lowest level since 2013.  The Officers Down Memorial Page (ODMP) appears to have more complete data than the FBI Law Enforcement Officers Killed and Assaulted (LEOKA) data. The LEOKA data depends on voluntary reporting from law enforcement agencies. The ODMP evaluates officer deaths which are submitted to it. The largest discrepancy noticed was in 2013, where ODMP listed 37 officers feloniously killed in that year and LEOKA lists 27.   In 2025, the two numbers are the same.  

The Crime Prevention Research Center has compare the first three months of 2026 with the first three months of 2024 and 2025, using the LEOKA data.  You can see 2026 is lower than the previous years for the first quarter. 

 

 The number of officers feloniously killed has been dropping since the 1970s. There are reasons for this drop. It has not been smooth. The numbers are relatively small, so there are significant changes from year to year. The chart below shows the numbers of officers killed feloniously with firearms from 1963 to 2014

 

 The number of officers feloniously killed with firearms is a pretty good fit to the number of officers feloniously killed, because most homicides of officers in the line of duty are committed with firearms. There are several reasons which may explain the drop. First is the introduction of soft body armor, especially the Second Chance vest in the early 1970s. There was better training on firearms retention, and the use of retention holsters. We also developed much better communications and emergency response systems, as well as better emergency room care. Together these things resulted in a two thirds drop in the numbers of officers killed in felonious attacks. The officers killed numbers tend to follow the overall homicide numbers which also dropped significantly since the 1990s.  The numbers in the first Trump term are lower than the numbers during the Biden administration.

Analysis:  As we continuously improve the technology used by the police, the officers killed feloniously will continue to drop. Robots are already being used to search houses. Cameras everywhere make criminals easier to find, and crimes easier to solve.

©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch
 

 

LA: Shreveport - Drinking, Assault , Shooting, Disarm, Shooting both Men Killed

Officers reportedly canvassed the neighborhood where the shooting occurred, interviewed witnesses, collected evidence, and executed a search warrant at the home.

Detectives were able to determine that the two individuals had engaged in a verbal altercation, which eventually escalated into a physical confrontation after someone pulled out a gun. Investigators believe a fight over the gun took place, which left both individuals shot.

According to SPD, a woman told police they had all been drinking.


More Here

FL: Bradenton - Managar Retrieves Handgun, Shoots Robbery Suspect

Detectives said that during the robbery, one 44-year-old customer refused to give money to the masked man and a struggle ensued between them.

The masked man then shot the customer at close range multiple times, deputies said.

Meanwhile, the on-duty manager got a handgun from an office in the arcade and shot once in the direction of the masked man, the sheriff's office said, adding that the suspect was not hit and fled from the arcade.


More Here

Thursday, April 23, 2026

Wyoming Self-Defense Reimbursement Bill Dies in House Vote

Wyoming lawmakers introduced a bill this year that would have given real protection to people dragged through the criminal justice system after using lawful self-defense. House Bill 14, titled Protecting self-defense-reimbursement and amendments, would have required counties to reimburse defendants who were found not guilty, had charges dismissed, or were otherwise released from prosecution because they reasonably used defensive force under Wyoming law.

But the bill did not make it out of the House. HB0014 failed introduction on February 10, 2026, by a 29-32-1 vote.

HB0014 was aimed at one of the most abusive realities of modern self-defense law: even when a peaceable citizen does everything right and ultimately beats the charge, the state can still leave that person financially wrecked. Lawyer bills, bail costs, lost work, and the stigma of arrest do not disappear just because a prosecutor loses.

This bill tried to address that by making the government pay when the system comes after someone who lawfully defended himself, his family, another person, or property. The bill text says the county “shall reimburse” reasonable costs, including attorney fees, bail costs, loss of time, and even costs tied to seeking expungement. From wyoleg.gov:

If a person who is subject to criminal prosecution is found not guilty, has had the charges dismissed or is otherwise released from custody or further prosecution because the person reasonably used defensive force in accordance with W.S. 6‑2‑602, the county where the person was charged or subject to criminal prosecution shall reimburse the person for all reasonable costs, including loss of time, bail costs, attorney fees and other costs and expenses involved in the person’s defense, including the costs of seeking or receiving an expungement under W.S. 6‑2‑605.

Under proposed W.S. 6-2-604, reimbursement would have been available when a defendant was found not guilty, when charges were dismissed, or when the person was otherwise released from custody or further prosecution because the person reasonably used defensive force in accordance with W.S. 6-2-602. That is broader than a simple acquittal-only rule and would have covered cases that never made it to a full trial.

If a defendant was acquitted at trial, the trier of fact would decide whether the person was eligible for reimbursement because the acquittal rested on lawful self-defense, but the court would determine the amount of the award. In dismissal or no-prosecution cases, the defendant could file a petition in the county court where the case arose, and the court would decide both eligibility and the reimbursement amount. In other words, the bill did not make the jury set the dollar value of the award.

HB0014 also would have added an expungement mechanism tied specifically to successful self-defense cases. A person found not guilty, released, or whose charges were dismissed because of lawful defensive force could petition for expungement in the county where the prosecution occurred. If the person was acquitted because of lawful self-defense, the bill says the court would advise that person upon acquittal of the right to immediately file for expungement. There would be no filing fee for the expungement petition.

(g)  If the court enters an order of expungement under this section, the person shall be deemed to have never been arrested, charged or prosecuted with respect to the matters and charges that are subject to the order of expungement, and the person may so swear under oath.

Bill HB14 is sponsored by 23 representative(s): Brown, G, Allemand, Banks, Brady, Campbell, K, Guggenmos, Haroldson, Heiner, Hoeft, Knapp, Locke, Lucas, Ottman, Riggins, Schmid, Smith, S, Strock, Styvar, Wasserburger, Webb, Webber, Wharff and Winter. The bill is sponsored by 4  Senator(s): French, Ide, Laursen, D and Pearson.

The Wyoming Senate has 31 members: 29 Republicans and 2 Democrats. The Wyoming House of Representatives has 62 members: 56 Republicans and 6 Democrats.  Governor Gordon of Wyoming took time to appear at the Governors Forum at the SHOT Show. He appeared to be a strong supporter of the Second Amendment. He does not appear to have made a statement for or against this bill.

Wyoming is following Washington State’s lead. In Washington, there is a self-defense reimbursement statute, RCW 9A.16.110. The Washington statute is used infrequently. The Wyoming bill goes a bit further than the Washington statute, as it includes particulars for expungement. The bill’s supporters expect it will also be used infrequently. The bill is expected to prompt prosecutors to be more careful in prosecuting self-defense cases.

For gun owners, the principle behind HB0014 is easy to understand. The right to armed self-defense means less if the state can prosecute a lawful defender, fail to convict, and still leave him bankrupt and branded. Anti-gun politicians and activist prosecutors love to talk about “process,” but process itself becomes punishment when the innocent are forced to spend months or years and tens of thousands of dollars proving what should have been obvious from the beginning.

A reimbursement statute does not give anyone a free pass for criminal violence. It simply tells the government that if it comes after a person who lawfully used defensive force and loses, taxpayers—not the innocent defendant—should bear the cost.

HB0014 is dead for now, but the idea behind it is sound. If states are serious about recognizing self-defense as a fundamental right, they should also recognize that an innocent person cleared on self-defense grounds should not be left holding the bill for his own vindication. Wyoming had a chance to move in that direction this year. The House chose not to.

©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

AZ: Tucson - Armed Victim Shoots, Kills Suspect During Robbery Attempt

UCSON, Ariz. (13 News) - The Pima County Sheriff’s Department says a suspect is dead after being shot during a robbery attempt Monday evening, April 20.

The PCSD says deputies responded to a residence in the 3600 block of West Avenida Fria for a reported shooting.

Detectives believe three male suspects, at least one of whom was a juvenile, attempted to rob a teen at gunpoint.

During the encounter, the PCSD says the victim fired his own weapon and hit two of the suspects.

More Here 

MI: Detroit - Three Assault Suspects Shot, Killed after Vehicle Crash

One victim was allegedly seen pointing an AK-style weapon at the person who ended up being the shooter.

The three victims, according to Detroit police sources, were the aggressors in this situation and began beating the shooter in his vehicle.

Detroit police sources also said late Tuesday (April 21) that the Wayne County prosecutor’s office has denied charges against the shooter.


More Here

Wednesday, April 22, 2026

5.7 Million Suppressors Registered: ATF Data Shows Massive Growth in Ownership


According to the American Suppressor Associations (ASA), the official number of silencers/suppressors registered in the United States of America was 5,776,685 as of the time they Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firarms, and Explosives (ATF) responded at the SHOT Show in January of 2026. This correspondent obtained information from the ATF on January 22, 2026. At that time it was stated the information had already been released, and over 150K National Firearms Act (NFA) applications had been approved in January of 2026 to that date.

The graph for registered silence numbers has been created using the cumulative numbers for January of each year from 2011 to 2026. When numbers were not available for January, linear interpolation was used to approximate the January number. Each year had at least one reference number.  2017 had three reference numbers, none of them for January.

The number of registered silencers has been compounding at a rate of about 22.6% per year.  That rate is roughly the same as doubling every 3.2 years.  If such a rate continues, there will be about 50 million registered silencers ten years from now.

It is unlikely there will be 50 million registered silencers ten years from now. This correspondent believes the registration requirement will be removed well before 10 years. It could be removed within two years, given the lawsuits now in play. 50 million silencers in the hands of American gun owners, ten years from now, is plausible.

Silencers are very popular firearm safety accessories when they are not restricted by oppressive governmental policies.  Silencers can be made inexpensively with economies of scale. Even the best, most technologically advanced silencers/suppressors will come down in price as economies of scale come into play.  In New Zealand, silencers had, until 2019, been an over the counter commodity, similar to purchasing a rifle scope in the United States. Silencers were relatively cheap.  From a Gun Watch article in 2015:

Silencers are often referred to as suppressors. The best descriptive term is gun muffler. In New Zealand, which has a strong tradition of gun ownership, gun mufflers are unregulated and cheap. They are for sale over the counter or in the mail. The above ads or similar ones can be seen on the online buying and selling site for New Zealand, trademeco.nzFrom trademe.co.nz . . .

This Silencer will fit any centrefire rifle with 17CM of exposed barrel with a diameter smaller than 19mm.

Takes away the loud crack (down to about a 22 magnum noise) and helps protect your ears from permanent hearing loss.

Super strong tooling grade alloy construction designed to withstand bursts of Full Auto fire, making it virtually indestructible on a hunting rifle and keeping the weight down to just 370 grams.

There is no licence required to purchase these in New Zealand.

Rimfire gun mufflers are commonly available for under $20. Consider that a New Zealand dollar is current valued a .65 U.S. dollars.

Silencer prices in New Zealand have increased, but they are still available through the mail.  The exchange rate is now about .59 USD to 1 New Zealand Dollar. At the current exchange rate, quality .22 rimfire suppressors can be had for about $36 USD, and quality high power rifle suppressors can be purchased for prices ranging upward from $120. The highest price showing was about $450 USD.  The New Zealand market is tiny compared to the United States. About 400,000 people in New Zealand are firearms owners, with about 1.77 million firearms.

Current prices for a silencer in the United States run about $350 to $2000. Those prices will drop with deregulation and economies of scale.

There are over a hundred million gun owners in the United States, with over 540 million firearms. A market for 50 million silencers in the United States, once the regulatory burden is removed, is entirely possible.

 

©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included. Gun Watch

 

 

 

 

 

 

 






TX: Houston - Homeowner shoots, Wounds Intruder

Houston police officers responded to a shooting call at a home in the 300 block of Truman Street around 2 a.m. According to investigators, the homeowner was awake and inside the house when a man broke in. The homeowner got a firearm from inside his home and shot the intruder once.

More Here

TN: Nashville - Son Shoots at Robbery Suspects, Hits Victim

Officers responded to a house in the 5100 block of Rhett Drive just before 1:30 a.m. Saturday. Authorities said a woman had just arrived at the house with a friend when three to four men attempted to rob them in the driveway.

The woman’s son reportedly witnessed the altercation and fired a shot toward the suspects, but that gunshot struck the passenger in the shin.

More Here

Sunday, April 19, 2026

FL: St. Petersburg - Cinderblock v Handgun, both Men in Hospital

The report said 41-year-old Anthony Oliver and 29-year-old DeAndre Randolph had been in a verbal altercation when Randolph hit Oliver over the head with a cinder block.

Oliver then used his firearm and shot at Randolph, according to police.

Both men sustained non-life-threatening injuries and were taken to the hospital.


More Here

Friday, April 17, 2026

GA: Newman - Driver Shoots, Kills Dog in Self Defense

The driver reported the dog was off its runner when it approached and attempted to bite him. Deputies said the driver then shot and killed the dog, according to the Coweta County Sheriff's Office.


More Here

Hero Principal Stops School Mass Murder with Charge and takedown


Principle takes down Attempted school mass Murderer

Security video shows Oklahoma principal Kirk Moore tackle a would-be school shooter. Principal Moore was wounded in the leg during the take down.

According to foxnews.com, on April 7, 2026, at about 2:21 p.m., in Pauls Valley High School, a former student, Victor Hawkins, entered the school and pulled a semi-automatic pistol. He appears to rack the slide to chamber a cartridge. About 4 seconds later, Principle Moore appears from the left and rear of the suspect, in full charge mode. Hawkins turns and manages to point the pistol toward Principal Moore, but Moore drives directly into Hawkins, driving him backward and down onto a bench in the school foyer. In two seconds Moore took Hawkins down and gained control of Hawkins gun hand. About nine seconds later, another person comes from the same area Moore came from, and picks up the handgun from the floor of the foyer. The slide of the handgun is locked back. It appears the magazine has been emptied. There is no audio in the video, so it is difficult to know exactly when or how many shots were fired. Speaking to KOCO-TV, Oklahoma State Bureau of Investigation spokesperson Hunter Mckee stated the multiple shots were fired, but only Principal Moore was wounded in the leg.

Analysis:

When looking at the video, it appears Hawkins has the handgun in his right hand inside the airlock. As he takes two steps into the school, he racks the slide. There was opportunity for Principle Moore to see the problem, formulate a plan, and take explosive action in those few precious seconds.

Principle Moore does not appear to be a Bruce Lee level martial artist or a Hulk Hogan body builder. He has something more important. Strong motivation and the ability to take decisive action almost instantly. It was the correct decision. Yes, Principal Moore took a bullet. It could have been much worse. He could easily have been killed, along with other innocents. His direct, high speed action short circuited the former student's plans. Most mass killers expect their victims to cower. Principal Moore did not cower. He acted.

In the military, this correspondent remembers something from an officer's training. A good plan, executed now, beats a perfect plan executed too late.

We cannot know if Principal Moore would have done better with a handgun of his own. That is not the way it happened. Hats off to a brave man who did not hesitate to do what was needed in a dangerous situation.

 ©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch
 

 


Wednesday, April 15, 2026

Fifth Circuit: Morris v. DOJ Home Distillery Case Precedent for NFA Tax

 

 

On April 10, 2026, a three judge panel published an opinion in Morris v. DOJ. In it the Court re-enforced the standing precedent: A tax which does not require a person to pay money to the federal government is not a tax.  The precedents cited in the case apply to the cases challenging the constitutionality of the Federal Firearms Act regulation of silencers, short barrelled rifles, short barreled shotguns, and any other weapons.  For those items, the tax has been reduced to zero.

The case in the Fifth Circuit is Morris v. DOJ. It is about the ban on home distilleries in federal law, put in place in 1868. The ban does not require a person to pay a tax to produce distilled spirits in the home. Instead, the law prohibits home distilleries altogether.  The relevance is there is no tax to be paid. From page 12 of the decision:

  “Congress’s authority under the taxing power is limited to requiring an individual to pay money into the Federal Treasury, no more.” 

The National Firearms Act (NFA) has always been justified under the authority of the Congress to raise taxes. It has not been justified as authority given to Congress by the interstate commerce clause. This was emphasized by Franklin Delano Roosevelt's Attorney General, Homer Cummings, as shown in a previous article on AmmoLand:

Then-Attorney General Cummings was clear about this in his testimony to Congress during the debates over the bill in 1934:

Courts have consistently upheld the NFA, and its registration provision, on the grounds that it was a tax.

Another Fifth Circuit case is directly challenging the constitutionality of the NFA registration requirements now that there is no tax on silencers, short barreled rifles and short barreled shotguns. Brown v. ATF is at the district court level. Issues of standing are being addressed. If the case proceeds to the question of constitutionality, Morris v. DOJ, the home distillery case would be binding precedent for the NFA zero tax case.  Because the home distillery case opinion was filed on April 10, it is possible an appeal to the case will be filed. If an appeal is filed, the case would not have as much precedential value until the appeal is completed.

Analysis:  The congressional power to tax was used as a work-around in 1934 to avoid the Second Amendment. The NFA has always been justified as a tax act, not a use of congressional power under the commerce clause. In 1934, the commerce clause had far less reach than it has been given in later years. In 1934, the Supreme Court had yet to rule the power to tax could not be used to subvert the Bill of Rights. In 2026, there is long standing precedent the power to tax cannot be used to destroy the Bill of Rights, and long standing precedent the taxing power has to actually have a tax in order to be legitimate. The NFA tax has been eliminated for silencers, short barreled rifles, short barreled shotguns, and any other weapons. The question is: how long will it take for the Supreme Court to recognize this? This correspondent is not a lawyer. The contents of this article is not legal advise.

 

©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch
 

 

 

 

 

WV: Wharncliffe - Domestic Defense, Father Shoots, Wounds Son

Brewer is accused of making verbal threats toward family members at the residence and then later firing a gun multiple times.

Troopers said Brewer, who was shot by his father in reported self-defense, was treated for non-life-threatening injuries at a local hospital and booked in Southwestern Regional Jail. No charges have been filed against the father.


More Here

Tuesday, April 14, 2026

Do Wounded Bears Attack More? Handgun Defense Data Tells a Different Story

Image of grizzly bear  by Troy Nemitz, used with permission. 

One theory about defending against bear attacks is this: Defenders must be careful not to shoot a bear without immediately killing it, because wounded bears are more likely to attack. The theory has been put forward for many decades. One of those who put the theory up for consideration was Stephen Herrero in his book: Bear Attacks: Their causes and Avoidance. On page 241 of the 1985 edition, Herrero writes:

Of course, if an aggressive bear actually attacks you or a companion, a firearm may be a lifesaver, or it may cause a wounded bear to intensify its attack. 

Herrero puts forward the theory.  He does not appear to have data to determine how common such reactions may be. His speculation is shared with numerous others over the last hundred years. With over 200 documented incidents where a handgun was fired in defense against bears, this correspondent has numbers which indicate 21% of bears continue to attack after they are shot. Of 175 incidents where bears were shot, they stopped attacking in 138 cases and persisted in 37 cases. Warning shots were effective in 23 of 44 cases. In 8 of the 23 cases the positive effect  of the warning shot(s) was temporary. There were four cases where it could not be determined if the bears were wounded or if the shots were effective. Of the 175 incidents where bears were shot, 29 were shot after a person was already injured by the bear. Of  the 146 incidents where shooting the bear occurred before a person was injured, the bears persisted after being shot in 31 cases, also 21%.

Bear attacks are often complicated. Some incidents fall into multiple categories.  For example, two experienced outdoorsmen were archery hunting in Montana in 2019. A grizzly bear attacked without provocation in dense cover. One of the hunters was being mauled before any shots were fired. The other hunter fired a shot from his 9mm and drove off the bear, wounding it. The bear persisted in coming back, twice, and the mauled hunter fired his 9mm, driving the bear away. Those shots probably missed, but stopped the persistent attack. In some cases, shooting can precipitate an attack.

In cases where bears persisted after being shot, over half the attacks were stopped before a person was injured. In the cases of persistence, the defense was successful in stopping the attack in all cases, even after a human was injured, except for one, the case of the .22 rimfire defense against a polar bear. To put it another way, when you only look at cases where the bear was shot, the success rate rises to 1 failure in 175 cases, or over 99%.

In the three other failures of handguns fired in defense against bears, it seems likely the bears were not shot. One was a failure of warning shots fired to drive off a polar bear. No humans or bears were injured. In the other two cases, it seems likely the bear was not wounded. Extreme speed and accuracy are not required for a successful defense in most cases.

Bears do not like to be shot. Most bears stop attacking when shot, or they are killed. Most bears which persist in attacking after being shot are killed. One of the societal advantages to killing these aggressive bears is their genes are removed from the gene pool. Bears in their generation learn that attacking humans is dangerous. The site where a human killed a bear is like scent version of a neon billboard in the woods. As the erudite Valerious Geist has written, this is a valuable outcome which protects everyone who uses wildlands in bear country. It must be noted, hunting bears is different from defending against bears. Hunters who wound bears are morally bound to follow the wounded bear to finish it off. Defenders are not so bound. A wounded bear is more likely to attack a hunter which is following it after it has been wounded. This is a different situation than a wounded bear continuing to attack when the bear initiated the attack.

Bear spray has been widely touted as more effective than firearms. The studies used to the compare the two were not designed for such comparison. The studies have serious problems with selection bias, acknowledged by the authors. A better comparison is the number of people who have been killed when bear spray was sprayed against a bear compared to the number of people killed when a handgun has been fired in defense against a bear. These incidents tend to be widely reported, reducing or eliminating selection bias. This correspondent has found eight documented cases where nine people were killed by bears where bear spray was used during the attack.  This correspondent has found one documented case where one person was killed by a bear where a handgun was used during the attack, the polar bear incident with the .22 rimfire handgun in the Svalbard archipelago.

Warning shots can work.  In one third of instances, their effect is temporary.  They buy time for the defenders. Seconds can be precious in preparing a more effective defense.

©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

MO:Springfield - Gunfight in Front of Residence, Parties in Vehicle Fled

The victim said they heard a backseat passenger asking questions, but could not understand exactly what was being asked. The person reportedly asked why he was being so hostile by displaying a handgun with a red laser.

As the victim is said to have tried to walk away, he heard gunshots, with him claiming he returned gunfire as the vehicle fled. The vehicle then turned back around and proceeded south, the victim said.


More Here

Monday, April 13, 2026

"Saint" Roger Benitez, Federal District Judge, Retires

 

Judge Roger T. Benitez, also known as "Saint" Benitez by supporters of the Second Amendment, has retired from federal service as of April 2, 2026. Judge Benitez was born in December, 1950, in Havana, Cuba. He fled the Castro regime in Cuba in 1960 with his brother, speaking only Spanish at the time. His family was reunited and eventually settled in the Imperial Valley of California.

Judge Benitez graduated from the Central Union High School in El Centro, California, then obtained an Associates degree from Imperial Valley Community College in 1971, a Bachelor of Arts degree from San Diego State University in 1974, and a J.D. degree from Western State University College of Law's San Diego campus in 1978. He spent 19 years in private practice in the Imperial Valley. He became a California Superior Court Judge from 1997 to 2001. Judge Benitez was appointed as a federal Magistrate judge in 2001. He was elevated to Federal District Judge in 2004, in spite of opposition from the American Bar Association. Judge Benitez assumed senor status on December 31, 2017

Judge Benitez first became known as "Saint" Benitez after his decision in  Duncan v. Becerra, later to be renamed Duncan v. Bonta.

 Judge Benitez was assigned the case before he assumed senior status. The case took nearly two years to adjudicate. In the case, Judge Benitez granted a motion of summary judgement against the State of California. The summary judgement was in effect from March 29 to April 5, 2019. It became known as "freedom week". Estimates suggest hundreds of thousands of magazines were legally purchased and shipped into California during that week.  Seven years later, the case is still under review. It has been appealed to the Ninth Circuit. The three judge panel affirmed Judge Benitez decision on August 14, 2020. Then the Ninth Circuit decided to hear the case en banc. The en banc panel reversed the decision of the three judge panel on June 22, 2021. The case was appealed to the Supreme Court. On June 30, 2022, the Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit en banc decision and remanded the case back to the Ninth Circuit. The Ninth Circuit remanded the case back to the District Court and Judge Benitez. Judge Benitez issued the decision on September 22, 2023. Judge "Saint" Benitez again found the law to be unconstitutional in a well written and argued decision. The state appealed this decision to the Ninth Circuit the same day.

The Ninth Ciruit, in an unprecedented move, voted to skip an appeal to a three judge panel, and to hear the case again, en banc. The en banc panel issued its opinion on March 30, 2025, again reversing Judge Benitez decision, with strong dissents. The case had become Duncan v. Bonta because of a change in the California Attorney General. The case is in the process of being appealed to the Supreme Court again. As of the time of Judge Benitez' retirement on April 2, 2026, the Supreme Court had not yet decided whether to hear the case for a second time.

In addition to Duncan v. Becerra, later Duncan v. Bonta, Judge Benitez issued a decision that the California ban on the AR-15 and similar
firearms violated the Second Amendment, in 2021. The Ninth Circuit put that decision on hold waiting the final decision on Duncan v. Bonta. Judge Benitez decided a law requiring background checks to purchase ammunition was unconstitutional in 2024. In 2025, a three judge panel of the Ninth Circuit upheld Judge Benitez decision on the ammunition law.  The panel's decision was appealed to an en banc review, and is now being considered by the Ninth Circuit, en banc. In a case about the Second Amendment on short clubs "billies", Judge Benitez originally found for the State of California. The Supreme Court sent the case back to Judge Benitez after the ruling of the Supreme Court in Bruen. Judge Benitez, following the Bruen decision, found the California law to be unconstitutional. California has appealed the case, which is now pending, awaiting the final decision in Duncan v. Bonta.

Judge "Saint" Benitez has now retired from the court. He is 75 years old. He leaves a rich legacy of cases and decisions which are superbly argued and written. Coming from a family which suffered significant persecution by unlimited government in Cuba, he held limitations on government power in the United States to be clear and legitimate.  His story is one of the American dream, from fleeing communism to his assent to high office, against the odds. His presence on the court will be missed.

 

©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch
 

 

TX: Arlington - Homeowner Shoots Catalytic Converter Theif Suspect

The homeowner told police he heard a noise outside and went to check, where he said he found a man trying to cut and steal the catalytic converter from his vehicle, according to what detectives told the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. During that encounter, the resident fired a single shot that hit the man. Investigators said they have not ruled out the possibility that the shooting was in self-defense.

More Here

Sunday, April 12, 2026

NICS Numbers March 2026, Gun Sales up, Background Checks Down



 

The National Instant background Check System (NICS) numbers for March of 2026 are in. According to the NSSF, adusted background checks, with give an approximation of firearm sales, are up 1.9 percent. Unadjusted NICS background checks are down 10.5 percent. This is consistent with a disconnect between firearm sales and NICS background checks.

The NICS is being used for more and more background checks which are not directly related to firearm sales. Chief among these are background checks for firearm carry permits and other firearm permits. As more states have become Constitutional Carry or permitless carry states, and as some states have stopped monthly background checks, the correlation between total NICS background checks and adjusted back ground checks to approximate NICS firearm sales has come to vary significantly.

Looking at the NICS adjusted data over the last twelve months from the NSSF, the first quarter (three months) of 2026 is slightly greater than the first quarter of 2025. The difference in the two years is not great, but adjusted sales in the last quarter of 2025 were definitely lower than in the last quarter of 2026.

One obvious reason for the difference is the conflict in the Middle East with Iran, where President Trump is fulfilling promises made over at least 15 years. Firearm sales are often driven by uncertainty. This hotter phase of the war with Iran, which has been ongoing for 47 years, has the additional effect of offering President Trump's opponents opportunities to attack him, as the final outcome has yet to be determined. Uncertainty abroad and domestically exists.  In addition, NICS sales are benefiting from National Firearms Act sales, which are more than double in the first quarter of 2026 over 2025. According to the NSSF, those sales added more than 130,000 additional sales in the first quarter.

Analysis:

This correspondent expects the outcome of the massive destruction the United States and Israeli forces are inflicting on the Iranian theocracy will produce a resolution by the end of April, 2026, as predicted by the Trump administration. Firearm sales will continue to be bumped up in April. After April, two things are likely. The world will be more stable due to a tamed Iran, which will no longer be sponsoring terrorism. The domestic situation will be more stable with falling energy prices and a victorious Trump administration. If those predictions come true, firearms sales would level off or decrease in May and June, which are months when firearm sales normally drop.

©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch
 

 

 

 

CA: Woodland Hills - Gunfight between Car Theft Suspects and Homeowner

According to initial information from news stringer KNN, a homeowner was awakened by noises outside and discovered two men attempting to steal his Chevrolet Camaro parked in the driveway.

The homeowner confronted the suspects, who were described as wearing black hoodies, and gunfire was exchanged. Evidence of the shooting included bullet holes in the front door of the home and spent shell casings scattered on the ground.

Blood was also reportedly found on the hood of the Camaro, suggesting one of the suspects may have been injured, though police have not confirmed any injuries.


More Here

TX: Houston - Road Rage/Crash/Self Defense Shooting?

The new video appears to show two trucks, one red and one white, get into crash. Houston police believe the driver in the red truck intentionally hit the white truck and a person in the white truck opened fire, hitting one person. The person who was shot died at the scene.

Authorities said the suspected shooter is the person who called 911 to report the incident and was taken to a hospital with non-life-threatening injuries.

More Here

WI: Milwaukee - Security Personal Stop Sexual Assault, one Shot Fired

According to the Milwaukee Police Department, security discovered a 31-year-old man sexually assaulting a 33-year-old woman at approximately 6 a.m. Thursday. Security personnel stopped the assault, and the man became combative. Security fired one shot, but no one was struck.

More Here

Saturday, April 11, 2026

Sec of War Hegseth Issues Memo: Presumption of Right to Carry

 

On April 2, 2026, Secretary of War Pete Hegseth issued a memo directing installation commanders to respect the Second Amendment rights of our service members on United States Military installations.  Hegseth noted the Constitution is there to protect the rights of all Americans, including the rights of service members which are protected by the Second Amendment.

The current policies in place in the United States military made it virtually impossible for service members to be able to carry arms for their own protection unless they were military police or in some training exercises. Installation commanders have had the authority to determine who may carry weapons on their installations. Secretary Hegseth directed installation commanders to start with the presumption that a request by a service member to carry a personal weapon for personal protection is valid. From the video:

 "The memo I am signing today directs installation commanders to allow a request for personal protection to carry a privately owned firearm with the presumption that it is necessary for personal protection.  If a request is for some reason denied, the reason for that denial will be in writing and will explain in detail the basis for that direction."

Military bases have been, in effect, gun free zones, where only a very few people, mostly military police, were allowed to be armed. Secretary Hegseth noted recent mass public shooting attacks on military bases at Ft. Stewart, Holloman Air Force Base, and Pensacola Naval Air Station.

Online commentary from declared veterans on X was often positive, with comments such as "best Secretary of War ever" and "this should have been done long ago". Detractors claim there will be a wave of accidental shootings, murders, and suicides as the policy is implemented.

War fighters will be required to follow the laws of the states where they are stationed. 29 states do not currently require a permit to carry handguns, concealed or openly. 21 states require a permit to do so. At present, only a few states allow concealed carry by persons under the age of 21. The memo applies to service members "..in their nonofficial duty capacity on DOW property within the United States."   The question of Second Amendment rights for 18, 19, and 20 year old people is being adjudicated in the courts.

 

In 2015, Donald Trump promised a similar policy. In 2018, this correspondent explained how the policy was neutered by the military bureaucracy in an article entitiled Defiance through Compliance.  The complex mechanisms set up in the military bureaucracy made it virtually impossible for the vast majority of service members to be able to carry arms for defense of self and others, except in an active war zone. All of the incentives were biased against commanders allowing their service members to be armed.

As Secretary of War Hegseth noted,  our military bases inside the United States can be targeted in asymmetrical warfare. Casualties at a United States military base inside the United States could be higher than the minimal casualties which have occurred in operation Epic Fury abroad. 

Analysis:

People who have obtained concealed carry permits have proved to  be more law abiding than police officers in the same jurisdictions. Military personnel who are willing to submit a request to their commanding officer in order to be able to carry personal arms for defense of themselves and others are likely to exhibit the same level of responsibility.

Most mass public shootings take place where the attacker knows most people are not allowed to carry defensive weapons. The memo from Secretary of State Hegseth is designed to remove military bases from that category.  The memo directs commanders to assume the need to carry for protection is legitimate. The incentives should become biased toward the protection of the right to bear arms.

Future memos might include retired military members, veterans, or simply those with carry permits among those allowed to carry on military bases. Retired police officers have a mechanism to carry nationwide. An increase in armed defenders increases the odds one or more will be available to defend against an attack.

 ©2026 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch