Friday, January 17, 2025

Proposed National Reciprocity on Concealed Carry: S65 Specifics

On January 9, 2025, Senator John Cornyn, (R TX) and Senator John Kennedy (R LA) introduced a national reciprocity carry bill.  The bill requires all states to allow people who may legally carry concealed handguns in their state of residence to legally carry concealed handguns in other states. A picture ID would be required to verify the residency of the person who is carrying a concealed handgun.

From the press release of Senator Kennedy:

This legislation would:

  • Allow individuals with concealed carry privileges in their home states to exercise those rights in any other state that has concealed carry laws.
  • Treat state-issued concealed carry permits like drivers’ licenses, allowing an individual to use his or her home-state license to drive in another state while abiding by the speed limit of whatever state that person is in.

The official text of S65 has not, as of this writing, been published in the Congressional record.  Senator Grassly (R Iowa) links to a copy of the proposed text. This correspondent will assume the text is accurate for the purposes of this analysis.

There are 43 sponsors and co-sponsors of the proposed bill. It is a good start.  The bill may need to overcome a filibuster. 60 votes are needed to overcome a filibuster. Of the 100 senators, 58 come from states with Constitutional Carry. The other 32 states have some form of shall issue carry. Only 20 senators come from states which are actively resisting the Supreme Court to deny people the right to carry outside the home.  There is a reasonable possibility for the bill to overcome a filibuster.

The bill provides for two cases where individuals must be allowed to carry concealed handguns in states where they do not reside. The two cases are:

1. If the individual is carrying government issued photographic ID and has a license or permit to carry from their state of residence

2. If the individual is carrying government issued photographic ID and is not prohibited from carrying a concealed firearm in the state in which the individual resides, otherwise than in paragraph 1.

The wording appears a bit awkward to this correspondent. The two cases appear to be for shall issue states and permitless carry states.  To qualify, Individuals must not be prohibited from carrying or possessing or receiving firearms in interstate commerce. The handgun must have been has been shipped or
transported in interstate or foreign commerce. Individuals must carry government issued photographic identification. Individuals are required to comply with the restrictions on concealed carry in the state they are traveling in, but only to the least restrictive standard of residents of the state who are issued a license or permit to carry.

Analysis: If passed, the economic and structural restrictions which apply to shall issue licenses in the most restrictive states, such as Hawaii and New York, would result in visitors from other states being able to carry concealed more easily than residents of those states. This is close to the same carry authority provided  to retired and active duty police officers by LEOSA, passed in 2004.

LEOSA has already been tested in the courts, found to be constitutional and enforceable. It has been expanded over the years.

S65 only applies to concealed carry of handguns, similar to the restrictions in LEOSA. Neither bill applies to open carry.

While S65 only mentions "states", it applies to all territories of the United States.  The LEOSA statute also uses the word "state" or "states" and applies in all U.S. States and U.S. territories.

The bill is in early stages. Amendments to bills are common as they go through the legislative process.

 

©2025 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch


 


 

 

 




 

ME: Man Steals Front End Loader, is Shot while Attempting to Destroy Occupied Home

Soon after the initial call, the caller reported that the front-end loader was now in their driveway, attempting to run through their house and destroying vehicles in their driveway, according to the sheriff’s office. 

Based on an initial investigation, the sheriff’s office said people in the home came out and fired several gunshots at the front-end loader. The machine then reversed out of the driveway and fled the scene, crossing a large field and going down a road into the woods.

More Here

KY: Laurel County Shooting appears to be Self Defense

Sheriff’s investigators determined that two individuals had allegedly been assaulted by a man at the residence. During the incident, the man reportedly reached for a gun and was then shot by another male in what appears to be an act of self-defense, according to the sheriff’s office.

More Here

Montenegro - Two Public Mass Murders in four Years in a Small European Nation


Map of Montenegro

On January 1, 2025, a mass murder was committed with firearms in the European country of Montenegro. Twelve victims were killed. The perpetrator, Aco Martinovic committed suicide. Martinovic had been previously convicted of possession of illegal weapons and was appealing his sentence. Four of the victims were shot in Martinovic's home. He was drinking heavily before the event. From rferl.org:

PODGORICA -- The Montenegrin government has announced a raft of new gun-control measures, following a mass shooting that killed 12 people, including two children.

The shooting took place on January 1 in the western Montenegrin city of Cetinje. Four other people were injured.

On August 12, 2022, another mass murder started with the murderer killing a mother and two children in his home. The killer then started killing random people in the city of Cetinje. Another seven victims were killed before an armed citizen stopped the rampage by shooting the murderer and killing him, while the murderer was in a gunfight with police.  From rferl.org:

 The Action for Human Rights and the Center for Women's Rights NGOs called for a thorough examination of the police response, saying that Cetinje had only a minimal police presence despite being home to 120 known organized crime members and having experienced a similar massacre in August 2022, when an attacker killed 10 people and wounded six before being killed by a passerby.

If a person looks only at these two incidents and the four year period in which they occurred, Montenegro has had .91 people killed in mass public murder with firearms per 100K population per year.

Over a 20 year period 1998-2017, the United States had .0079 people killed in mass public murders where firearms are used. The rate in Montenegro for 2022 - 2025 was 115 times as high as the rate for the United States from 1998-2017.

The comparison is not fair, because it looks at a four year period in a country with a population of about 600,000 (Montenegro) compared to a country with over 315 million over a 20 year period (USA).  When an attempt is made to correlate mass murder with firearms to the number of firearms in a country, there is no correlation.  Overall, Europe does not have a great difference in the number of people killed by by public mass murder with firearms. Much depends on the definitions used.

The Montenegro experience dramatically illustrates the lie put forward by the Left: Mass murder by shooting only happens in the United States. This is illustrated by quotes in Crime Prevention Research Center study of mass public murder with firearms around the world, published in 2020. The CPRC goes on to show mass public shooting in Europe are pretty common. The study eviserates the lies quoted below.:

 “The one thing we do know is that we have a pattern now of mass shootings in this country that has no parallel anywhere else in the world.” –President Obama, interview that aired on CBS Evening News, Dec. 2, 2015

“This doesn’t happen anywhere else on the planet.” -- California’s Governor-elect Gavin Newson, referring to 12 people killed at the Borderline Bar and Grill, Thousand Oaks, California, November 8, 2018

“We stand alone in the world in the number of mass shootings," Representative Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), November 5, 2018

Claims that the USA is unique in the number of mass public murders with firearms have become scarce after the presentation of Lott's paper to Congress.  Mass murder with firearms has little to do with the number of firearms legally available to the citizens of a country.

chart of countries gun ownership v mass murder with firearms

An interesting bit of information is the persistent claim one of the two mass murders in Montenegro was stopped by an armed citizen.

According to Crime Prevention Research Center, the FBI has consistently overlooked and misclassified reported cases where privately armed citizens have stopped mass murder. The FBI reported 4.1% of cases were stopped by armed civilians. The CPRC research shows the correct number to be  35.7%. If cases where private citizens are banned from carrying guns are taken out of the mix, the number is 63.5%.  The death toll in the USA would likely be much higher if citizens were forbidden from carrying weapons for defense.

Montenegro has one of the highest rate of private firearms in Europe. Looking at the data collected by the CRPC and presented by John Lott, there are several countries in Europe which surpass the number of people killed in public mass murders with firearms in the United States. Those include Norway, Kosovo, Finland, and France.  The trending tactic used to commit mass murder trend is to use ramming attacks with vehicles, such as the one in France in 2016, in which 84 (updated to 87) people were murdered.

Banning gun ownership by private citizens does not stop mass murder. In some ways, it facilitates mass public murders by greatly restricting the ability to fight back. None of the policies put forward in the wake of public mass murder with firearms in the USA would have been stopped by "universal background checks" or requirements to lock up firearms.

Analysis:

Mass murder is a cultural phenomena, independent of the weapons used.  The most important and effective way to stop mass murder is to stop the media contagion effect. Media contagion happens which media gives enormous coverage to mass murderers, making anti-heros of people bent on mass murder/suicide, or celebrates mass murderers as Jihadi martyrs.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch



 

 

 

 




 



 


 

All of the above is true. It illustrates  of the ways to lie with statistics.


In August of

 

People killed in Mass Public Shootings per 100k per year  in Montenegro 2022-2025  population 605K   .91


Paper on rate of mass public shootings by Crime Prevention Research Center

Paper presented by John Lott, Congressional testimony 2020   has graphs




From rferl.org:


PODGORICA -- The Montenegrin government has announced a raft of new gun-control measures, following a mass shooting that killed 12 people, including two children.

The shooting took place on January 1 in the western Montenegrin city of Cetinje. Four other people were injured.

Montenegrin Prime Minister Milojko Spajic announced the proposed new Law on Weapons on January 3 following a seven-hour session of the National Security Council, which is chaired by the country's president.

The proposed law will mandate the reverification of existing weapons licenses and impose severe penalties for those who fail to surrender illegal weapons within a two-month period. Spajic also said that hunting clubs would be verified and the authorities would establish an anonymous tip line where citizens can report illegal weapons possession for a reward.

Manhunt

The suspected shooter, Aco Martinovic, died on the way to the hospital after attempting suicide following the killings and subsequent manhunt.

Martinovic had previously had illegal weapons confiscated in 2022 and received a three-month prison sentence in late 2024, which he had appealed.

Police have not yet revealed the identities of the victims, but they are believed to have been relatives, friends, and godparents of Martinovic.

(snip)

The Action for Human Rights and the Center for Women's Rights NGOs called for a thorough examination of the police response, saying that Cetinje had only a minimal police presence despite being home to 120 known organized crime members and having experienced a similar massacre in August 2022, when an attacker killed 10 people and wounded six before being killed by a passerby.

AL: Armed Robbery suspet Shot and Killed by Shell Gas station Clerk

ST. CLAIR COUNTY, `Ala. (WBRC) - A 44-year-old armed man from Hale County was shot and killed Jan. 12 during a robbery.

The St. Clair County Sheriff’s Department says Timothy Jones went into the Shell gas station in Cropwell around 4:30 a.m. with a knife. He was shot and killed by the clerk.

More Here

NY: Legally armed Brooklyn Man Shoots armed Robbery Suspect

A licensed gun owner who fatally shot a young man in a Brooklyn park in the dead of night claims he was acting in self defense after the 23-year-old victim tried to rob him at knife point, police sources said Tuesday.

The shooter told detectives he was walking through Carroll Park on President St. near Smith St. in Carroll Gardens around 2:45 a.m. Saturday when Jordan Dillard put him in a chokehold, and with a knife to his neck, demanded he hand over cash, law enforcement sources told the Daily News.

The two men fought until the would-be robbery victim, who has a concealed carry permit, whipped out a registered gun and shot the assailant in the torso. A knife was recovered at the scene; there’s no indication Dillard and the gunman knew each other, according to the sources.


More Here

PA: Harrisburg Fatal shooting may have been Self Defense

The shooting happened at a home on the 1200 block of Walnut Street near North 12th Street around 6:45 a.m.

When officers got there, they found two men who had been shot. Both were taken to the hospital.

One of the men died. He has been identified as Franklin Roosevelt Lee, 64.

The other man survived. He is the suspected shooter, according to police.

On Monday, Chardo told WGAL News 8 that investigators are looking into whether the shooting might have been self-defense. Stay with us for updates on this developing story.


More Here

Wednesday, January 15, 2025

Ohio Court of Appeals: People may not be Deprived of Second Amendment Rights upon mere Indictment

Ohio Statehouse

In 2023, a prosecutor, using a grand jury, brought an indictment against Kendall Brown for robbery. The robbery indictment lead to an charge of possessing a firearm while under indictment. The robbery indictment was dismissed, but the charge of possession of a firearm while under indictment persisted. Brown moved to dismiss the charge for  firearms possession while under indictment. The trial court agreed and dismissed the firearms possession charge. The state of Ohio appealed. On January 3, 2025, the State appeals court agreed with the trial court, in a split decision, 2-1.The Court found the statutory ban of possession of a firearm while under indictment was unconstitutional under the Second Amendment. From the decision, Ohio v Kendall Brown:

BERGERON, Judge.

{¶1} This case concerns the State’s power to disarm one of its citizens based solely on the fact that he is under indictment. After defendant-appellee Kendall Brown was indicted for a robbery but released on bail, officers discovered a gun in his home. The State then charged Mr. Brown anew, this time with possessing a firearm while under a disability—specifically, possessing a weapon while under indictment for a felony offense of violence. Mr. Brown moved to dismiss the new indictment, and shortly thereafter, the court dismissed his robbery indictment. He thus maintained, and the trial court agreed, that the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution bars a prosecution like his. The State now appeals, asking us to resolve whether the Constitution prohibits Ohio from disarming an individual based solely on his indictment for a felony offense like robbery. On the facts and history presented in this case, we hold it does. We therefore affirm the trial court’s judgment dismissing Mr. Brown’s indictment.

Kendall Brown had never been convicted of a felony. He had never undergone a trial. He had only been indicted, which is to say, accused by a prosecutor. No Judge and jury had ever considered evidence presented by Kendall Brown or his attorney.

In this particular case, the evidence was weak. The robbery indictment was dismissed before the case ever went to trial. The conduct, keeping (possession) of a weapon is clearly part of the rights protected by the Second Amendment. Only three states have similar laws banning possession for a person under indictiment. The other two states are Hawaii and Washington. Ohio has only been in existence since 1972. There is no evidence felons were disarmed at the founding. From the Ohio Appeals Court Ruling:

The State, quite simply, fails to demonstrate any specific tradition in this country of disarming those indicted for crimes of violence. And an indictment on probable cause cannot be reasonably analogized to a conviction by a jury persuaded of guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

In Ohio, the prosecutor relies on a nine person grand jury, of which only seven need to agree to obtain an indictment. A grand jury lacks important protections which exist in a jury trial. From the ruling, p14-15:

In presenting to the grand jury, prosecutors are not encumbered by the Ohio Rules of Evidence, see Evid.R. 101(D)(2), or the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule, see United States v. Calandra, 414 U.S. 338, 354 (1974), leaving them free to rely upon hearsay or evidence seized unlawfully. Further, the prosecutor may withhold from the grand jury material evidence that would be exculpatory to the accused. State v. Wilks, 2018-Ohio-1562, ¶ 31, citing United States v. Williams, 504 U.S. 36, 51-52 (1992). This is why, as the old adage goes, many believe that you can indict a ham sandwich.

Indictments are backward looking; surety laws were forward looking.

The right to keep and bear arms, protected by the Second Amendment, was not a privilege one forfeited as a punishment, but a right that yielded when an individual was found by a court to be particularly dangerous. While such determinations were sometimes categorical, they were often, as in the surety laws, individualized and forward-looking.

Disarmament can be included as a condition of bail. The federal statue forbidding sale of firearms to people under indictment is different in a critical way. Simple possession is not covered by the federal statute, it is only forbidden:

"to ship or transport in interstate or foreign commerce any firearm or ammunition or receive any firearm or ammunition which has been shipped or transported in interstate or foreign commerce.”

If a person is already in possession of a firearm, before an indictment, the federal law does not require them to forfeit their firearm. The federal law does not prevent someone who is under indictment from carrying a firearm for protection, unless they cross state or international borders.

Analysis: This correspondent believes the federal ban on acquisition, but particularly on transporting a firearm across state boundaries while under indictment, to be unconstitutional as well. As part of bail proceedings, restrictions may be put on travel. Those are individualized restrictions on a case by case basis, and may be appealed. The federal ban for people under indictment lacks serious due process protections.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

 

 



 


NM: Close Encounter Leads to Gunfight

A Friday night (Jan. 10) incident inside a house in west Roswell left one man dead and another man injured after the men shot each other during a confrontation. The Roswell Police Department’s investigation is ongoing, but at this time investigators believe the shot that killed the one man was fired in self-defense by the surviving man, who called 911 to report the incident. 
 
Police responded to the 1500 block of North Montana Avenue shortly after 9:30 p.m. Officers encountered a 30-year-old man and a 28-year-old female friend of his in front of the house, which is the man’s residence. The man had suffered a single gunshot wound to his midsection and was transported to a hospital with what are believed to be non-life-threatening injuries. 
 
Inside the house, police found Alvin Sedillo, 27, unresponsive and suffering from multiple gunshot wounds. Medics administered aid to Sedillo, but he was soon declared deceased at the scene. 
 
The investigation by RPD’s Criminal Investigations Division found that the two men, who were each in possession of a gun, and the woman were hanging out at the house and drinking. Investigators have further determined the following at this point: Sedillo left the house at some point, but later returned and became aggressive, producing a gun and demanding the other man and the woman give him their phones and other items and drive him to another location. Sedillo also demanded the other man give him his gun. When the man refused, Sedillo shot the other man. The other man then used his gun to shoot back at Sedillo multiple times. The woman was not injured during this incident. 
 
Once the RPD investigation is concluded, its findings will be reviewed by the District Attorney’s Office, which will make the final decision on whether any charges will be filed. Based on the initial findings of the investigation indicating self-defense, RPD has not made any charges against the surviving man at this time.


More Here

TN: Attempted theft results in Gunfight, 1 Suspect Shot

He said he followed the men outside, grabbed the grocery cart, and tried to take the stolen merchandise as the suspects entered a van.

Reports say a man, identified as 33-year-old Robby Wooten, then got out of the van with a handgun, fired a shot into the air, and threatened to kill the store manager.

The victim reportedly fell to the ground and Wooten pointed the gun at him, but the victim pulled out his own gun and fired shots at the suspect.

 

More Here

Tuesday, January 14, 2025

Review: But What About Ammo? by Ivan the Troll

Ivan the Troll has published an instruction set on making 9x19mm ammunition. The ammunition is designed for the FGC-9 hybrid 3D printed semi-automatic pistol/carbine in Europe. The ammunition is shown in video as functioning in an FGC-9, Browning style  tilt-barrel locking pistols and a straight blowback pistol.

The instructions were published in 2020 before Stark1809's untimely death. They are titled But-What-About-Ammo Version 1.0.

The instructions are detailed and fairly easy to follow. They use 3D printing and a number of well understood improvised loading techniques to load fired 9mm cases and primers to end up with usable ammunition. 9mm ammunition is difficult to purchase in most of Europe, unless the purchaser has a firearms license. Even then, a firearms license often only applies to purchasing certain kinds of ammunition. Deactivated (fired) 9mm cases and projectiles appear to fairly easy to obtain.

The downloaded guide contains detailed specifications, video of testing, velocities obtained, and  a shopping list of what materials to purchase.

The most interesting part of the video is how Hilti nail driver ammunition is used as a source for priming compound and gunpowder. Much of the value of the directions consists of Ivan the Troll's experimental work to determine the proper amount of powder to use from the Hilti power drivers to obtain usable velocity out of the reloaded 9mm cartridges.

For those interested in such techniques, one of the most dangerous and resource eating tasks is to calibrate the amount of scavanged gunpowder needed for a functioning reload. Ivan the Troll has done this time and resource consuming work. He makes the results available to the world. 3.5 grains of red Hilti gunpowder does the job to produce about 750 feet per second loads with 124 grain jacketed bullets. 4.1 grains of Hilti gunpowder produces about 1000 feet per second.

Insert image of Hilti from whataboutammo image in pictures file

If it is difficult to legally obtain 9mm ammunition, it is almost as difficult to test improvised ammunition.

Ivan the Troll does a good job to show how to make ammunition with his methods.

For those who desire the next level of reloading ammunition in restricted circumstances, this correspondent recommends Modern Handloading by Maj. George C. Nonte, Jr.  Nonte's book was published in 1972. It has an entire chapter on making your own tools. Many of the tools can easily be made by hand. A case resizer made of steel or even of low melting alloys would be much easier and more durable than the method used in ButWhatAboutAmmo. The 3D printed plastic resizer only works well for about 20 rounds.  If a person has access to a small lathe, the work becomes almost trivial.

Of particular interest in Ivan the Troll's work was his description of how well the ammunition functioned in the FGC-9. The FGC-9 is a direct blowback design. The somewhat weaker versions of the reloaded 9mm ammunition are said to have performed well:

The FGC-9 will run even the underpowered loads (because it is simple blowback), the handguns all need the ‘recommended’ loads in order to cycle – they still fire with the underpowered loads, but won’t cycle the slide fully.

Note: I did experience some failures to extract on the FGC-9 tests when using the recommended loads as they are higher pressure, which makes blowback extraction more haphazard. The barrel I had in my FGC-9 for these tests isn’t perfectly formed, which is probably the reason for the failures – but it’s worth noting that if you have issues with extraction of this ammo when other ammo works fine, you might want to load a little less powder.

This correspondent has reloaded ammunition for about six decades, using everything from simple handmade tools to sophisticated progressive machines. The hardest part of reloading, if the authorities do not want you to do it, is the information and knowledge of how to do so. Mass manufactured tools are very nice and make the job much, much easier. If you desperately need a few rounds of ammunition, and have some time, you can usually figure out how to get or make a few rounds. It is the knowledge which is key.

Defense Distributed and Ivan the Troll are making the knowledge available to the world.

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

 

 

 

 



 


 


(much of Europe and the rest of the world)


But WhatAbout: Ammo  

How to make your own caps and primers AmmoLand

 

Reloading in restricted circumstances AmmoLand

I highly recommend Modern Handloading by Maj. George C. Nonte, Jr.


NY: Buffalo Off Duty Officer Shoots Robbery Suspect, Child Endangered

According to Buffalo Police, Dorian Jones, 19, allegedly robbed the officer near the intersection of Delaware Avenue and Hertel Avenue by showing what appeared to be a handgun while taking the victim’s vehicle – a 2010 Mercedes. The vehicle contained one of the victim’s children, age 13, while a second juvenile, 15, was outside of the vehicle with the victim. Buffalo Police said the off-duty officer shot the suspect during the robbery attempt.

Jones was located on Wilbury Place, police said, and was taken to ECMC with non-life threatening wounds. The vehicle was retrieved around the corner on Wilbury Place and the 13-year-old juvenile was safely located. A pellet gun was also found, police said.

More Here

Monday, January 13, 2025

AL: Burglars Enter Gun Shop at 3 a.m. Suspects Arrested at 5 p.m. January 12, 2025

The Priceville Police Department said two suspects entered Tucker’s Guns & Ammo in the 600 block of Highway 67 around 3 a.m.

PPD said at 5:09 p.m. Sunday that they had arrested and charged 19-year-old Maki William Burt, of Decatur, with second-degree burglary. Three people under the age of 19 were also arrested and will face criminal charges, but due to their age police did not identify them.


More Here

Sunday, January 12, 2025

NICS December, 2024 Gun Sales and 2024 total Predictions Confirmed

 


NSSF uses a slightly different method to estimate gun sales

The National Instant background Check System Checks (NICS) recorded the sixth highest gun sales on record for December, 2024.

Last Month this Correspondent predicted, on AmmoLand: December sales would be about 1.6 million. Gun sales for 2024 would be about 14.6 million. From the previous article:

 "This correspondent expects a drop in gun sales in 2024, to a bit less than what was recorded in 2022, to about 1.6 million sales."

 Estimated gun sales for December, 2024 were 1.62 million.

"This correspondent’s prediction is 2024 will have had 14.6 million guns recorded as sold by NICS."

Estimated gun sales for all of 2024 were 14.68 million.

 


Comparison of gun sales by type, 2023 to 2024

The gun sales for December of 2024 were the seventh highest on record. The total gun sales for 2024, as estimated from recorded NICS sales, are the eighth highest since NICS started records in 1998. 

December is usually the strongest month for gun sales through the NICS system. Gun sales dropped off in December, most likely because of the election of former and future president Donald Trump. Donald Trump has always campaigned as being friendly to and protective of, the Second Amedment. Major campaign supporter of Donald Trump, Elon Musk, transformed the media landscape with his purchase of Twitter. Musk has been a strong and vocal supporter of the Second Amendment.  Donald Trump's three Supreme Court appointments made all the difference in restoring the Second Amendment to the same level of official recognition as the First Amendment.  That fight continues with a few states defiant of the Supreme Court and the Constitution.

People considering purchasing firearms no longer needed to fear the political attacks of the Biden administration the Democratic party and the "old, dominant media". The "old dominate media" showed it was no longer the dominant or mainstream purveyor of news, able to gatekeep information and create the narrative it desired for the nation. Without the fear of the Democratic party, or the fear-mongering of the "old dominant media", the urgency of firearm purchases has receded.

Some market segments may be saturated. When Barack Obama was elected, the estimated number of "modern firearms " (1899-2008), privately owned in the United States of America was 308 million. In the last 16 years, another 208 million have been added to the private stock. 

Constant dollar prices for practical and effective firearms, have decreased by roughly 75% in the last 120 years. Quality ammunition prices have dropped by about 90% or more in constant dollars. Anyone who can legally own a gun, in 90% of American states, can own one and a hundred rounds of ammunition for a weeks work at a minimum wage job.  In a few states and cities, the right to own a firearm is still limited by legislation.  Those unconstitutional statutes are being challenged in court. 

The states in defiance include the high population states of California, Illinois, and New York. When court cases prevent those states from unconstitutionally infringing on Second Amendment rights, expect a significant increase gun sales, to meet the pent up demand.

December of 2024 was the 65th consecutive month where gun sales, as estimated by the National Shooting Sports Foundation, totaled over one million a month.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch




 




 

 


 

Saturday, January 11, 2025

FL: Murder Charges Dismissed for Ed Druzolowski ; Self Defense on his Property


Video at this link to report From fox35orlando

On December 27, 2024, a judge finally dismissed murder charges against Edward Druzolowski. Druzolowski, aged 78,had shot and killed a violent felon, Brian Ford, 42, who was a neighbor. Ford had approached him with a chain saw and threatened him, on September 17, 2023, more than a year previously. The incident happened on Druzolowski's property in Volusia County, Florida.

Durzolowski was covered by Florida's Stand Your Ground law. Why did it take so long for the judge to dismiss the charges? The incident appeared to be a case of self defense by an elderly man defending against a violent felon.

Druzolowski may have made misstatements in his early talking to police officers. Early stories did not mention that Ford had a chainsaw or that he had threatened Druzolowski. Early reports, published on September 18, 2023, claimed Druzolowski said the opposite. From Fox35orlando:

Druzolowski said he thought his neighbor would leave his property after he pointed the gun and told him to leave. He said he had the gun for his protection and that he felt safer with it, but also noted that his neighbor did not have anything in his hands – weapons or otherwise – and did not threaten to harm or kill him.

Image of Edward Druzolowski 

Druzolowski was reported to have said he believed his revolver had two empty chambers, and the second pull of the trigger would also be a "click". Instead it was a "boom".

Two days later, it was reported Fords son, eight years old, who was at the scene of the shooting, had told police officers a different version of events. The son said his father had told Druzolowski  he would cut off Druzolowski's head with a chainsaw. The son said the chainsaw was not running at the time.  The chainsaw and two knives were found at the scene next to Ford's body.  The event occurred on Druzolowski's property. Ford was cutting tree limbs on Druzolowski's side of the fence with the chainsaw.  From fox35orlandoeo:

Criminal defense attorney Michael Panella was not involved in the case, but said a stand your ground defense comes down to reasonableness, and whether the threat justifies deadly force.

"First of all, the decedent was armed. I think that's a huge deal. The fact that he had the capability to cause great bodily harm with a chainsaw during this altercation can’t be underscored enough", Panella said. "The other issue that came up in this case is that he had a reputation for violence."

Panella also noted the drastic age and strength differences between Ford and Druzolowski – all factors he said a judge would take into consideration when ruling on a stand your ground case.

According to the Volusia County Clerk of Courts, Ford had been arrested close to two dozen times since 2004. Some of his charges were violent offenses.

Another incident in Florida in 2023 involved a gun and a chain saw. From AmmoLand:

In 2023, in another gun v. chainsaw incident in Florida, a Florida Court of appeals ruled merely displaying and loading a firearm was not a "use of deadly force".

Analysis:

It is bad policy to attempt to give detailed responses to police immediately after a self defense event. These events almost always produce high levels of adrenaline. Acute stress can cause memory loss and the distortion of events in memory.  If Druzolowski's first interview with police  had included the chainsaw, knives, and the threat, he might never have been prosecuted.  Those facts were included in his testimony after the effects of the stress wore off and he had the aid of an attorney. From synopticpotential.com:

What’s more, science suggests that the effects of stress on your ability to remember can be quite long-lasting (e.g. from 25-90 minutes after the stress) whilst your cortisol levels are still elevated, and only recovering once your cortisol has started to near its baseline levels.

In the emotion of the aftermath of shooting his neighbor, those facts escaped his memory. The physical evidence and the testimony of an eight year old who was on the scene, with no reason to lie about a threat by his father, were extremely important.

This correspondent knows of several instances where victims psychologically have a difficult time admitting they had to kill an attacker in self defense. Instead they fantasize it was an "accident", or "I did not intend to shoot him", or "The gun went off". These sort of statements can conflict with a legal justification of self defense.  They indicate a crime of manslaughter or negligent homicide. If a person did not intend to shoot, the justification for shooting in self defense is placed in question.

If a person is involved in a case of self defense, consultation with an attorney should be done before a detailed statement is given to the police. Police officers routinely wait 24 hours before giving detailed statements when they have been involved in a shooting. 24 hours gives time for the stress to wear off and memory to return.


©2025 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch


WA: Gunfight in Montlake Terrace, Suspect Wounded, Drives Stolen Truck to Hospital

A vehicle theft suspect ended up at Swedish Edmonds Hospital after being shot by the truck owner’s relative while leaving the scene in the 23000 block of Lakeview Drive in Mountlake Terrace Thursday morning.

Mountlake Terrace Police Cmdr. Scott King said the suspect was in the process of stealing a truck around 4:30 a.m. Thursday and was confronted by the truck owner’s relative. The thief pointed a pistol at the relative in response, but the relative was also armed with a handgun and fired at the suspect.

The person stealing the truck was successful and drove away, not to freedom, but to the hospital.


More Here

Americans Can Handle the Truth - and Weapons

 

 

A recurring theme of modern culture is the idea: ordinary people cannot "handle" the truth. It is a way to say ordinary people cannot be trusted to know what government knows. It is an excuse and justification for the government to keep secrets from the American people. The supposed stupidity and cupidity of most people is a key part of Progressive ideology.

A ubiquitous theme promoted by Progressives is the necessity of controlling "public opinion" and "manufacturing consent". This is in direct opposition to Christian ideology, as common in colonial America. The founding ideology  of the United States of America is natural law supported by Judeo-Christian ethics. Natural law is based largely on the ability of individuals to understand what is in their own interests, and to act on those interests.

The Second Amendment is based on the idea that people can know their own interests. People can band together to promote their own interests. Society is better if everyone is armed to protect their own, and societies, interest in mutual defense, property rights, and the rule of law.

The worship of the truth is a key part of Christianity. In the bible, Jesus says, "I am the truth".  Jesus says the revelation of the truth will set his followers free. The pursuit of the truth flowered during a combination of the reformation and renaissance, when the printing press and paper created an explosive revolution of knowledge as important as the invention of writing.

Pursuit of the truth led to the scientific method and the industrial revolution.  Islam floundered on a denial of objective truth, because the dominant theology in Islam came to be an insistence that Allah could and would change reality at will. The past, the present, every bit of existence at any instant, is subject to change at any moment in Islam.  Thus no search for objective reality or for physical laws would or could be fruitful.

Progressivism echos this fluidity in its understanding of the universe by its insistence that nothing is permanent or knowable (except to "Experts"). Everything is changing all the time. Only skilled and dedicated Progressive "experts" can understand what is happening. Governments have to be able to change all the time and instantly, to cope with a changing reality. Therefore, what the mass of the people know and think has to be constantly managed, to prevent them from doing stupid things and doing things against their "own interests".

Stupid things are defined to include throwing Progressives out of power.

How often have you read of Progressives (leftists) saying a certain group voted against their own interests? This is a shortcut version of the above. Progressives assume they know everyone's interests better than the people themselves do. Marxist theory does the same. Marxists claim people who disagree with them to have  "false consciousness". The consciousness Marxists consider to be true is that which validates their assumptions about reality. Woke theory is a variant. White people are defined as racist, whether they know it or not. No one who is not Woke can define what a woman is.

In contrast, the American Founders trusted the people, on average, over time, to know their own interests. They also knew different people's interests and different groups interests often conflict. The checks and balances of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were put in place to keep any one interest group, especially the interest of people in political power, whether State or Federal, from promoting their interest ahead of all others.

The First Amendment is based on the theory a vigorous debate is the best way to determine the truth. The Scientific Method is based on anyone being able to challenge scientific findings by duplicating experiments to see if the same result is obtained. "Scientists" who refuse to reveal their data invalidate their own results.

If you cannot see the data sources, you cannot duplicate the results.

If a person "can't handle the truth" they should not be trusted to handle firearms responsibly. Progressive ideology has gun control in its DNA.

You can handle the truth. You can handle weapons.  The truth shall set you free.

The flip side is: Lies enslave you and liars lie to you to keep you enslaved.

When someone tells you the public cannot handle the truth, they are advocating for unlimited governmental power.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

 

 

 

 


 







Friday, January 10, 2025

ID: Wendell Man shoots, Wounds Man who Brandished Knife

WENDELL, Idaho (KMVT/KSVT) —The Gooding County Sheriff’s Office responded to a call for service for a shooting incident in Wendell Monday afternoon. The reporting party informed law enforcement that an individual was shot while they were wielding a knife.

According to preliminary reports, the incident took place at approximately 2:05 p.m. on East Ave. B. According to Prosecutor Trevor Misseldine, Ryan Rollins approached a man that he knew, while reportedly brandishing a knife. In response to that action, a man discharged a firearm striking Rollins.


More Here

Thursday, January 09, 2025

Review of APA Paper on Psychopathy, Gun Carrying and Firearm Violence

Jaleel Stallings mug shot after arrest and beating by Minneapolis Police.  Stallings was found not guilty after firing at police in self defense. 

A paper published in the Psychology of Violence is interesting because of what it did not find. The paper did not find any correlation between legally carrying a gun and four psychopathic measures. The four facets are "affective" (lack of empathy), "interpersonal" (manipulative), "lifestyle" (impulsive), and "antisocial".  "Carry a weapon sometimes for protection" is defined in the four measures as "antisocial".   When carrying a gun for protection is defined as "antisocial", it is unsurprising the paper found correlation between illegally carrying a gun and the "antisocial" trait. This is an example of circular reasoning.

The paper found carrying a gun, both legally and illegally were correlated to firing a gun in self defense. Carrying a gun illegally was more strongly correlated to firing a gun in self defense.

The paper is titled:  Psychopathy, Gun Carrying, and Firearm Violence. it was published by the American Psychological Association (APA) in the publication, Psychology of Violence. It was published for the first time online on August 22, 2024.  The authors are Sophie L. Kjærvik and Nicholas D. Thomson. The paper is seven pages long.

The paper did not measure any actual criminal or violent incidents. The researchers recruited a group of adults at an urban hospital in Virginia. The adults were in the emergency room or the hospital because of injuries inflicted on them by violence from other individuals. There were 343 recruits. 53% had gunshot wounds. 38% were victims of an assault. 9% had a stab wound. 254 of the participants were men. All the participants were 18-75 years old. The participants identified themselves as 65% black, and 12% white. The rest, 23%, were classified as "other". Prisoners and minors were not recruited.

The participants were paid $160 to fill out questionnaires for the study. Filling out the questionnaires took about 2 hours per study participant.  339 of the 343 participated. 17 of the questionnaires were incomplete.

The study consisted of compiling the results of the questionnaires to look for correlations between four facets (traits) associated with psychopathy and behavior with guns. The behavior with guns included three questions about behavior with guns. They were: carrying a firearm with a permit, carrying without a permit, and firing a gun for self defense.  Using a gun for self defense without firing it was not measured. Aggressive behavior with a firearm was measured on a separate scale, which included eight items. These eight items were the study's measure of "Firearm Violence". The items were:

1. Once in a while I get the urge to shoot at another person.
2. Given enough provocation, I may shoot a gun at another person.
3. If somebody hurts me, I may shoot a gun at them.
4. I fire a gun with the intention to hurt somebody a little more than the
average person.
5. If I have to resort to shooting a gun at someone to protect my rights, I will.
6. There are people who pushed me so far that I fired a gun at them.
7. I have threatened people I know with a gun.
8. When I get angry, I shoot a gun.

The eight items were adapted from the Buss-Perry Aggression Questionnaire, which has nothing to do with firearms or weapons.

Readers will note items 2,3,5, and possibly 4,6, and 7 are all dependent on context, which is not measured in the questionnaire.  For example:

2. "Given enough provocation, I may shoot a gun at another person."

If a person is threatening to kidnap a mother's 3 year old child, most people would believe the provocation would be enough to justify shooting at them Or:

7. I have threatened people I know with a gun.

If the person you are threatening has threatened you in the past, you have a restraining order against them, and they are attempting to break into your home, in most jurisdictions, you would be justified to threaten them with a gun.

1 and 8 are not reasonable. 4 is problematic. However, if you are well trained and aware, living in a dangerous environment, it could be reasonable to say:

"4. I fire a gun with the intention to hurt somebody a little more than the average person."

It is illogical to fire a gun at someone without the intention to hurt somebody. Your primary objective would be to stop the attack. But it is likely you will have to hurt them to do so.

The paper lacks a definition of what "gun violence" or "firearm violence" is. The term "firearm violence" is in the title, and appears eight times in the paper. The term "gun violence" appears 21 times in the paper.  The term "gun violence" appears to mean different things on different pages.  It appears to mean all homicides, accidents, suicides, and injury in which a firearm is involved when referenced in the first sentence of the body of the paper. It seems to mean only criminal behavior with a gun on page 2. "Firearm violence" appears to mean some measure of "firearms aggression" by use of the eight measures on the "firearm aggression" score on page 3, table 1.  The two terms appear to be used interchangeably.  Gun violence, as used in the first sentence and in the conclusion, is an Orwellian, emotionally laden term.

The sample is far from representative of society at large. All participants were recovering from violent injury. It seems likely victims of interpersonal violence, with over half suffering from gunshots, would see the value in shooting at a person who "hurt them" or "provoked them" or "to protect their rights" in completely moral and justified ways.

None of John Lott's research is included in the references, nor is the recent major survey on gun ownership and use by Professor English. Critics of John Lott, Hemenway and Azrael, are included in two references.

The study assumes two highly disputed premise, based on two individual papers. The two premises are:

"Carrying guns increases the risk of injury and death (Branas et al.,
2009) and is a well-established precursor to subsequent gun violence
(Pardini et al., 2021)."

Both premises are disputed. Increased carry of firearms has not increased homicide or suicide, as shown in many states. Increased injury or death, if it happens, which is highly disputed, is not always bad.

The implication is self defense is bad. Increasing the risk of injury or death to violent human predators would be considered a public good by most people. "Gun violence" is not necessarily evil or wrong. To assume so is an extension of the emotional belief "guns are bad".

On the last page of the study, this sentence appears:

Enhancing firearm access restrictions for individuals with a history of violence, coupled with education and training programs for firearm owners, may contribute to reducing the risk of gun-related indicine.

This correspondent was unsure what it means.  Definition of indicine:

of or relating to Asian cattle of the species Bos indicus

In spite of the biases in the study, the conclusions reinforce the results of research by John Lott and Professor English. People who legally carry guns are intensely law abiding.  Self defense is a primary motivation for carrying a gun. Self defense with a gun is common.

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

GA: Domestice Defense in Grovetown, Pregnant Woman Shoots Father of Child

GROVETOWN, Ga. (WJBF) – A man has been arrested on criminal trespass and family violence charges after the Grovetown Police Department responded to reports of shots fired on Monday.

The incident took place after 9 p.m. on the 7600 block of Main Street on Jan. 6. Responding officers learned that a woman had shot a man who allegedly beat on the front door and windows attempting to enter the home. Police stated the woman said the man “was the father of her 2-year-old daughter and that she was currently nine months pregnant with his child as well.”


More Here

NC: Raleigh Gunfight, Armed Victim Shoots Carjack Suspect

RALEIGH, N.C. (WNCN) — A teen suspect with a gun was shot Sunday night during an attempted carjacking at a motel near Crabtree Valley Mall off Glenwood Avenue at Interstate 440, police said.

The shooting was reported just after 8:50 p.m. along Arrow Road at the Red Roof Inn, according to the Raleigh Police Department.


More Here

Tuesday, January 07, 2025

SC Sheriff: No Charges for Clerk who Killed Armed Robber, Second Amendment


Link to video

U.S.A. --(AmmoLand.com)- On December 28, an armed robber entered a Mini Mart & Tobacco store in Chesterfield County, South Carolina. The robber put a gun to the clerk's head. The clerk accessed his own gun. The clerk shot the robber, killing him before the robber could kill him. The Sheriff's office responded quickly, investigated the scene, and watched video from the store. Less than two days later, the Sheriff's office released an official statement to the public. From facebook.com, Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office:

On December 28, 2024 at 8:47 pm, the Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office responded to an Armed Robbery at the Hwy. 9 Mini Mart & Tobacco store located at 28495 Hwy. 9 in Pageland. Upon arrival, deputies discovered a deceased black male with gunshot wounds. The store clerk gave a statement that the black male had entered the store and put a gun to his head and demanded money. The clerk then produced his own handgun and fired multiple shots at the robber. This was confirmed by the store surveillance video obtained and reviewed by Chesterfield County Sheriff’s Office Investigators. The South Carolina Law Enforcement Division (SLED) was called to process the crime scene.
 
Sheriff Cambo Streater would like to remind the citizens of Chesterfield County, that South Carolina law states "A person who is not engaged in an unlawful activity and who is attacked in another place where he has a right to be, including, his place of business, has no duty to retreat and has the right to stand his ground and meet force with force, including deadly force, if he reasonably believes it is necessary to prevent death or great bodily injury to himself or another person or to prevent the commission of a violent crime.”
 

Sheriff Streater strongly supports the rights of our citizens to protect themselves.

Based on the above facts, and after consulting with the 4th Circuit Solicitor's Office, no charges will be filed in this case.

This case was investigated by the Chesterfield County Sheriff's Office, the Chesterfield County Coroner's Office and SLED.
Two days earlier, Manatee County Sheriff in Florida reinforced the utility of Second Amendment rights in a home invasion case.

Analysis:

The case, the investigation, and the quick release of a statement by Sheriff Cambo Streater in South Carolina are an example of how digital technology is changing and improving responses to crime. The speed of the investigation and the decision to not charge the clerk was possible because of the video evidence. The outcome is far different from cases where a victim may wait for weeks or months to know what will happen while investigators re-create the scene, do forensic analysis, and leave the victim in doubt about legal jeopardy.
 
When someone has been killed in a violent encounter, investigating officers should not blindly accept the account of a person who claims to be the victim. Careful analysis is called for. Video can immediately answer obvious questions. Did the deceased actually put a gun to the head of the clerk?  Does the video  confirm the account of the clerk?
 
The video of the encounter should be released to the public. This removes doubt about the incident and stifles rumors. As of this writing, the video in this incident has not been released.  Trust in law enforcement can be enhanced by public access to video evidence.
 
Video can mislead as well as enlighten, especially if the video has been edited. Video editing has been used to mislead the public. The Rodney King case is a classic example.
 
©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch


AZ: Tucson, Domestic Defense, Man Shoots, Kills Woman

The adult male caller, who admitted to discharging his handgun, stayed on-site and cooperated with investigators.

Police say Nunez and the caller were in a domestic relationship.

Preliminary findings indicate that Nunez forcibly entered the victim’s apartment, where an altercation ensued, during which she was shot.

Detectives from the Homicide Unit are continuing their investigation. No charges or arrests have been made.

 

More Here

TX: Corpus Christi Homeowner Drives off Intuder who threatened him with a Machete

Officers arrived and spoke with the homeowner who stated an unknown male suspect was in the homeowner’s backyard with a machete in his hand and made several threatening movements towards the homeowner. The homeowner advised he feared for his safety as well as the safety of his family, retrieved a firearm and shot at the suspect who was threatening them. It is unknown if the suspect was shot but the suspect fled from the backyard into the neighboring field.

More Here

Monday, January 06, 2025

NSW Police and Thanes Australia Threaten Lithgow Small Arms Museum, a World Treasure


The world famous Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum (LSAFM) in Australia is under threat from a combination of police bureaucracy and French/industrial clueless or hostile management. On August 25, 2024, thieves broke in and stole 27 antique and collectable pistols. At this time 18 of the pistols have been recovered. 

One of the two displays the 27 pistols were stolen from. There were dozens of such displays in multiple rooms in the Museum.


This correspondent visited the wonderful museum in 2019. It is an incredible example of cultural heritage and history. It contained thousands of invaluable historical artifacts of firearms and their technology. Here is a summation from the save the museum site, as of 30 October, 2024:

Following a break-in on 25 August, making national and international news, urgent security upgrades are needed.  Approval for these upgrades has still not been given by the site owner. This is despite their knowledge that the museum’s future is now at risk. Delays and uncertainties regarding site ownership threaten conservation and education on this remarkable site.

NSW Police have ordered security upgrades to protect the historic firearms collection. Three of these are critical for safe-keeping of the historic firearms. Another 14 are necessary before rebuilding of the displays can begin. Without these upgrades, LSAFM risks losing its firearms permits, which would lead to the confiscation of its collection and the death of the Museum. The historic firearms were the Factory’s major product and remain a key drawcard for visitors.

The multinational Thales Group, the building owner, has prohibited any work, even minor cosmetic fixes, from proceeding without their approval.  For the critical security upgrades, LSAFM volunteers worked urgently to submit the highly detailed quotes and specifications demanded by Thales. It has now been over eight weeks without approval. Thales is aware of the financial strain—$5,000 per week for night security guards—and the impact on volunteer morale and stress. 

Meanwhile, the Museum remains closed, and we have no income. The volunteers are eager to start rebuilding the exhibits, but their hands are tied.

Thales is a major technology and defense company partially owned by the French government.  Thales Australia currently owns the property on which the Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum is located. The property and the Museum cannot be reasonably separated. There was a in process agreement to transfer the property where the museum is sited, and which is an integral part of the Museum, from Thales to the Museum for a nominal fee. With a change in the administration of Thales, that agreement has stalled.

Empty museum displays while $5,000 a week are spent on security, mandated by NSW police.

It appears the police requirement for security upgrades, combined with either indifference or hostility from Thales Australia management, has placed this cultural treasure in imminent danger of extirpation. The combination of police requirements for security upgrades and the glacial response of Thales Australia management is causing the Museum to hemorrhage cash.  $5000 a week for security is not sustainable.

According to New South Wales law, local police are able to require and enforce security measures for firearms storage.  One of the requirements for collection and display is that handguns be permanently rendered inoperable (primarily by means of welding). This destroys the value of collectable firearms. It was reported to this correspondent an exemption had been granted to the LSAFM in 2019. 

There are two different petitions available for people to sign to let authorities know they believe the museum is valuable and worth saving. One of these petitions is online to the New South Wales Parliament.  When this correspondent clicks on the link, access is denied for security purposes. This petition may be limited to residents of New South Wales.

There is a Global online petition to secure the future of Lithgow Small Arms Factory Museum. The global petition appears to be available to everyone. 


©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

MO: Warsaw, Armed Samaritan Shoots Man who Stabbed Victim

WARSAW, Mo. (KY3) - One man has died and another one injured after a fight at a Motel in Warsaw on Friday.

According to Benton County Sheriff Eric Knox, the incident happened at the Lake Hills Motel on Highway 83.

Sheriff Knox says an argument escalated into a fight between a 55-year-old man from Illinois and 55-year-old Kevin Noland of Warsaw. Noland was stabbed and died on the scene from his injuries.

Authorities believe the man who stabbed Noland was the man from Illinois. Another man, a 61-year-old from Warsaw, intervened and shot the suspect in the leg.

More Here

OH: Englewood Break-in Attempt Leads to Fatal Shooting by Resident

The police said the man who lived at the home thought the intruder had left and checked his backyard shed.

He then walked toward the street to see if his car had been broken into.

“He was confronted by the suspect. The suspect came toward him. He, in fear for his life, fired three shots from this firearm,” Englewood Police Chief Corey Follick said.

The man killed was identified as 43-year-old Matthew Culham.

Follick said his actions were unusual for a burglar.

“Most burglars, if they determine the home is occupied, once they’re detected they flee the area,” he said.

Follick said the evidence gathered at the scene did support the couple’s version of what happened.

Police can’t explain Culham’s actions at this time.

 

More Here

Sunday, January 05, 2025

Cultural Change: Florida Sheriff Tells Criminals: Break in, Expect to be Shot


Soto-Mella

On December 27, 2024 WFIN in Florida quoted Manatee County Sheriff Rick Wells about a recent home invasion and shooting. The Sheriff said:

“This is the state of Florida,”  “If you want to break into someone’s home, you should expect to be shot.”

The incident happened on December 26, 2024 about 9 p.m. From wfin.com:

“He knew something bad was about to happen and he didn’t stall,” MCSO Sheriff Rick Wells said during a press conference Friday. “He grabbed his firearm [and] told his wife to get into a safe spot.”

The homeowner fired multiple rounds, hitting Flores-Toledo “several times,” while Soto-Mella fled the scene, according to the sheriff’s office.

“I sat down next to the lanai, the door was open,” John Nuceder, who was visiting a family member in the neighborhood, told Fox 13. “I vividly heard three gunshots.”

Authorities said Flores-Toledo was initially reported to be in critical condition before being transported to Sarasota Memorial Hospital, where he died Friday morning.

“This is the state of Florida,” Wells said. “If you want to break into someone’s home, you should expect to be shot.”

Deputies tracked down Soto-Mella, who was in the country illegally after his 90-day visa expired in September, using K9 units and arrested him a few blocks away, according to the sheriff’s office. The scene was secured and everyone involved was accounted for, posing no threat to the community.

The man who was killed, Flores-Toledo, was from Mexico. His immigration status was not mentioned. The man with him is from Chile and was in the country illegally.

Analysis:

Situational awareness is key. The homeowner noticed the two suspects before they broke in. This gave him time to access his firearm, gain tactical advantage, and advise his wife to seek shelter. It seems likely the couple had a plan for such a situation, because they acted quickly. Too often, people see danger forming and refuse to accept what is happening. This leads to dangerous delays in an effective response. The United States is one of the very few jurisdictions which protect the inherent right of people to use firearms to defend themselves and, to varying degrees, their property.

Neither Mexico or Chile have anywhere near the concentration of firearms in private hands which exists in the United States. A homeowner in the United States who shoots and kills a home invader is not particularly uncommon. A sheriff who openly celebrates homeowners defending themselves against criminals, by exercising their Second Amendment rights, is becoming more common.  There have been several instances over the last few years.

For 150 years, the ability and willingness of Americans to defend their homes with deadly force was applauded.  From about 1965 on, there was a growing trend to denigrate American citizens use of firearms to defend themselves, to denigrate the Second Amendment, and to slowly disarm Americans. That trend is dead.  While not fully restored, the Second Amendment is being restored in legislatures and by the courts.

Kudos to Sheriff Rick Wells. He is an American politician/lawman who is stating the obvious. I expect him to be re-elected. He has been in office for almost eight years. He is married to Lupita Wells and has three sons.

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

VA: Arlington - Argument Leads to Gunfight, two Wounded

ARLINGTON, Va. – The Arlington County Police Department’s Homicide/Robbery Unit is announcing an arrest in the January 1, 2025, shooting inside a residential building in the 1000 block of N. Glebe Road. Malachi Rawlings, 21, of Washington DC was arrested and charged with Aggravated Malicious Wounding, Use of a Firearm During the Commission of a Felony, and Felon in Possession of a Firearm. He is being held without bond in the Arlington County Detention Facility.

At approximately 1:11 a.m., police responded to the report of an assault with a weapon. The preliminary investigation indicates the male suspect became engaged in a verbal dispute with a group of individuals inside a common area of a residential building. The male suspect then brandished and discharged a firearm, striking the victim. One member of the group then discharged a firearm, striking the suspect.

The victim, an adult male, self-reported to an area hospital with non-life-threatening injuries.

The suspect was located at the intersection of N. Glebe Road and 11th Street N. Medics transported him to an area hospital for treatment of a non-life-threatening gunshot wound. Following medical treatment, he was arrested and charged.

This remains an active criminal investigation. Anyone with information related to this incident is asked to contact the Arlington County Police Department’s Homicide/Robbery Unit at 703-228-4180 or ACPDTipline@arlingtonva.us or anonymously through the Arlington County Crime Solvers hotline at 1-866-411-TIPS (8477).

More Here

Saturday, January 04, 2025

Book Review: The Year-Long Day by A.E. Maxwell and Ivar Ruud, 240 pages, J.B. Lippencott Co. 1976


 

In the Arctic winter of 1970 to 1971, a trapper/hunter in the Svalbard Achipelago had to protect himself from polar bears several times. This is not particularly unusual. It was unusual for Ivar Ruud to keep a detailed diary, make a movie and  have a book published about his experiences. Most arctic trappers and hunters do not keep detailed diaries, make movies, and write books. Ruud had an older partner, Fredrick Rubach. In their first year together, they harvested over fifty polar bears.  After the first year, they moved into separate cabins about 15 miles apart along the coast.  They would only see each other when they were dropped off, at Christmas, and when picked up in the summer.

While researching defenses against bears in the arctic, this correspondent found the account of Ivar Ruud referenced in the Polar Bear Human-Information Management System (PBHIMS) data base. The PBHIMS was obtained through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) by AmmoLand. Used copies of The Year-Long Day  are sometimes available on ABE Books or Biblio. My copy was found in very good condition for $25 and shipping. The book is fast paced. It mentions enough of the daily grind to inform the reader, but is successful as adventure story telling.

The year of the account is, apparently, 1970-1971, according to this source. It matches with the authors description of it being his fourth year at Hornsund fiord, starting in 1967-68, when he was about 21.  His last overwinter at Hornsund fiord appears to have been 1971-1972. Polar bear hunting in the Svalbard Archipelago was outlawed in 1973.

The book is a very well written, non-fiction account of adventure and survival. It is a page turner which captured this writer for several hours. At least five instances are documented of Ivar Ruud shooting polar bears as they charged him. Two of those were while hunting the bears. The other three were from bears hunting Ivar, or at minimum, investigating Ruud as potential food. When a polar bear is attempting to enter your cabin with you inside, it is a serious threat.

For those interested in factual accounts of survival, hunting, and adventure, this is a wonderful book. Ivar would be about 78 today. An online source says he became a successful real estate agent in Southern California.

Of particular interest to this correspondent, the incidents in the book are not well matched with entries in the PBHIMS. The database includes one predatory attack while Ruud was in a tiny cabin. It includes one charge while Ruud was actively hunting polar bears. It does not include a predatory incident where Ruud was not hunting polar bears and had to shoot one at under 15 feet in the polar night while on a trail, or another incident where a polar bear was shot charging at him when he was on top of a cabin and the bear was only a few feed away.

This correspondent suspects a great many attempts of predation by polar bears on humans were stopped because the humans were armed. The vast majority of those were never recorded or published. If anyone knows if Ivar Ruud is alive or available, this correspondent would love to interview him.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch






CA: Person Breaking into Home reported Shot by Homeowner

Emergency services are responding to a shooting incident involving a homeowner and a suspect during a break-in attempt.

 

More Here

GA: Domestic Defense, Atlanta woman Shot, Killed in Love Triangle

Investigators say a domestic dispute involving one man and two women ended with a former girlfriend shot dead and a current girlfriend taken to police headquarters for questioning along with the boyfriend, who police describe as a witness. 

The victim's name has not been released, but FOX 5 Atlanta has been told she is 28 years old.

The Atlanta Police Department now classifies the deadly shooting as a "Felon Killed by Private Citizen."


More Here

 

Additional Here

Walmart Kindly Requests People not to Openly Carry Firearms


This correspondent walks into a Walmart about once a week to monitor local ammunition prices. Long experience has demonstrated that no gun signs are seldom noticed. Some effort is expended, attempting to do better at noticing them. At the entrance of Walmart, a sign mentioning a firearm was noticed, in relatively small letters, among other information, toward the top right corner of the entryway. The notice said:

Kindly refrain from openly carrying a firearm.

This correspondent is armed nearly all the time. Whether a firearm is carried openly or concealed or firearms are carried both ways, depends on what is deemed most advantageous for the particular time and place. Open carry is especially effective as a political statement. Open carry is not as necessary or useful in Arizona since the state restored Constitutional Carry in 2010.

This correspondent carried openly in the local Walmart in May of 2021 and met another customer there who was carrying concealed. At the time, Walmart did not ask this customer to leave the store.

Astute readers will notice the current Walmart signage is a polite request, not a demand or a command. The request only required a minor shifting of clothing to accomplish.  A polite society is a positive value. Acceding to a polite request does not mean it must be followed if it becomes burdensome or dangerous to do so.

There are only four states where open carry is generally banned by law. They are California, Florida, Illinois, and New York. One of those states is not like the others. Florida has permitless carry, but bans most open carry of firearms.

This year there will be another attempt to have the Florida legislature repeal the general ban on open carry in what has been called the “gunshine” state. Previous attempts have failed, primarily due to divisions in the Republican party. With the vast majority of states having open carry, it is hard to see the arguments in Florida against open carry as legitimate or reasonable.  Governor DeSantis says he supports open carry. Florida Carry is pushing to repeal the open carry ban. From wusf.org:

“Florida Carry is gonna continue this fight,” said Friday. “We are going to get the right to open carry because currently, there is no right to carry a shotgun or rifle in the state of Florida outside of your home if you are not hunting. That is an unconstitutional deprivation of that right.”

Eric Friday makes a legitimate point. Carrying long guns concealed is much more difficult than carrying a pistol concealed. Carrying long guns concealed generally makes them much slower to bring into action.  Bans on the carry of long guns are not supported in the legal history of the United States.

Open carry is a method of carry which has been honored in the United States of America for centuries. It is only in recent years when it has been banned in a few places. Even in the 1950’s in New York City it was not illegal to openly carry long guns.

 

©2024 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch