Modest home in Billings, Montana, where Gabriel (Gabe) Metcalf lives with his mother.
On Wednesday, August 23, 2023, Gabe Metcalf was arrested by ATF agents outside his home. Metcalf was arrested by federal agents of the ATF for possessing a firearm in a federal Gun Free School Zone in Billings Montana. A search warrant was executed after the arrest. The warrant shows the agents seized a single shot, break-open shotgun, six rounds of ammunition, and a Samsung phone.
Billings police had several contacts with Gabe prior to the arrest by federal agents. It has been reported Billings police stated he was not breaking any state law. From billingsgazette.com:
“We have made contact with him on multiple occasions, and currently he is refusing to stop displaying his firearms while on his property,” said police Lt. Matt Lennick. “At this time, he has not done anything illegal and we do not have the authority to arrest him, take his firearms, or force him to stop coming out into his yard.”
Gabe has stated he does not have mental problems, he is protecting himself and his loved ones, and he does not do drugs. He has stated he is not a danger to other people or the children at the school. The Billings police did not attempt to have him evaluated for any mental condition. This correspondent has not had contact with Gabe or his court assigned attorney.
The prosecution asked for a pretrial detention order. Pretrial detention is an unusual condition. No bail is set. The defendant is locked up until his trial is over. In the case of a constitutional challenge, this could take years. Magistrate Judge Timothy J. Cavan granted the Order of Detention for Gabriel Metcalf. The only reason checked on the order of detention pending trial form is a box for "History of Violence or Use of Weapons".
This is the first order of detention this correspondent has seen which cites the reason for pretrial detention is the defendant believes he has a right to keep and bear arms, and the federal Gun Free School Zone Act is unconstitutional. From the Order of Detention, pending trial:
Explanation for Order of Detention Pending Trial:
Defendant lives on a busy street in Billings, Montana, across the street from an elementary school. He has been charged with possession of a firearm within a school zone. According to testimony at the detention hearing, Defendant believes possession of the firearm and patrolling the area around his property within the school zone is necessary to protect he and his mother from a perceived threat posed by a former neighbor. Testimony established that he has possessed the firearm on public property within the school zone, and has chased automobiles he believes may be associated with his former neighbor. He has previously been advised that he is prohibited from possessing a firearm within the school zone, but he has stated his belief that the law is unconstitutional and has asserted his right to do so. Given the Defendant's belief that he has a right to possess a firearm within a school zone, and his belief that possession of a gun is necessary for his protection and safety, the Court finds it is unlikely that he would abide by any condition prohibiting him from possessing a firearm while on pretrial release. Therefore, there are no conditions or combinations of conditions which can be imposed to reasonable assure the safety of any other person or the community if released.
Here is an image of the above, to show the veracity
This correspondent has not been able to find any history of violence for Gabriel Metcalf. His "use of weapons" appears to be a simple carry of a single shot shotgun without any threats or assaults associated with the carry. In a previous article, this correspondent speculated about the possibility of the prosecution attempting to punish Gabriel Metcalf by asking for exorbitant bail.
The US Attorney may try to punish Metcalf with the process, for example asking for exorbitant bail, and trying to keep him locked up while the case is ongoing, pushing for a plea deal.
The detention order goes far beyond exorbitant bail. It precludes any bail at all. Kyle Rittenhouse killed two people and wounded another in self defense in Kenosha Wisconsin, and had bail set at a two million dollars. The Billings Police were unable to find a legal reason to arrest Gabriel Metcalf. If he had assaulted anyone or threatened anyone, such as pointing a firearm at them, he would be subject to arrest. The Billings Police asked the ATF to investigate Gabriel Metcalf because the Billings Police had no reason to arrest him.
Much remains unclear at this time. The Billings Police had flagged the person Gabriel Metcalf said he was defending against, David Carpenter. The police hesitated to talk to David Carpenter in person, for safety reasons, so they used phone interviews to investigate.
Analysis:
The ATF has seized Gabriel's single shot shotgun and his six cartridges. It appears he does not have the means to purchase another firearm. As he is under indictment, he is precluded from legally purchasing another firearm. Yet Judge Cavan writes it is unlikely Gabriel Metcalf would abide by a requirement he have not firearms during his release, quote:
Therefore, there are no conditions or combinations of conditions which can be imposed to reasonable assure the safety of any other person or the community if released.
Gabriel's public defender may appeal this decision to hold him without bail until trial. Federal courts have ruled a person can be held without bail for an "important government interest". If belief the Second Amendment protects a persons right to keep and bear arms in public places is one of the conditions for pretrial detention, the fabric of the Bill of Rights is at risk.
Update:
Gabriel's mother, Vivian Young, has set up a GiveSendGo campaign, YoungMetcalfHomeDefenseFund, in order to aid in his defense and to provide much needed security for their home. Although the ATF had the keys to their home, an ATF agent kicked in the front door anyway.
©2023 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.
Gun Watch
Posts
6 comments:
I can't understand why the 2A Rights litigation groups are not lining up to defend this case. This is the best shot we've ever had to get rid of the heinous GFSZA, yet he's using a PUBLIC DEFENDER!!
FACT: Guns prevent an estimated 2.5 million crimes a year or 6,849 every day. 98+% of the time the gun is not fired and no blood (including the criminal’s) is shed.
SOURCE: http://www.gunfacts.info/pdfs/gun-facts/7.1/Gun-Facts-7.1-screen.pdf, pages 21, 83.
FACT: 98% of mass-shootings occur in gun-free zones
SOURCE: https://www.dailywire.com/news/what-percentage-mass-shootings-happen-gun-free-amanda-prestigiacomo
SOURCE: https://slowfacts.wordpress.com/2023/05/29/how-we-stopped-mass-murderers-time-after-time/
ATTENTION PSYCHOS: Gun-Free Zone - All Occupants Have Been Disarmed for Your Safety and Convenience
https://i.imgur.com/ZPcMkWq.png
To TPKeller.
They don't know the details yet. The local media is painting Gabe Metcalf as a nut job. The amount of disinformation and spin is reminiscent of the Kyle Rittenhouse case. I can only write so many articles, so fast. Getting the word out is key.
Google has set up a warning about the post, claiming it "contains sensitive information", which of course drives away traffic and limit the spread of the information.
The biggest thing right now is to help Gabe survive in Jail. There is going to be tremendous pressure on him to accept a plea deal. He is not even allowed to have any books. His mother, home, and pets are now mostly unprotected.
Mr. Weingarten:
We're missing some details on this; we must be. As I understand it, Metcalf's home is within 1,000 feet of school property, therefore, he is affected by the federal statute prohibiting possession of firearms within 1,000 feet of school property. I do not know if the state of Montana or Metcalf's local community has a similar statute.
If my understanding is correct, then:
Metcalf would be in violation of the statute even if he were inside his home unless that 1,000 foot distance terminates within the interior of his home, placing some rooms outside the restricted area (I do not know if the wording of the statue specifies the full interior of any such structer so affected).
Metcalf has no means of entering or leaving his property without being in violation of the statute, therefore even if he were not in violation of the statute while inside his home, he has no means of procuring a firearm and bringing it home without being in violation of the statute.
Metcalf has no history of criminal activity, violence, illicit substance use or involvemrnt with illicit, regulated, or prohibited substances, "moral terpitude" or mental infirmity, which would justify involvement of local non-federal authorities in his community or other non-federal authorities in the state of Montana.
So far, it appears his only "crimes" are his address because of the geographic location of that address, and the fact that he possesses a mechanical device that, under the control and direction of the operator, propels a projectile(s) by means of expanding gases produced by combustion of a solid, and those things are adequate to produce confinement without bail by U.S. federal government authorities.
Do I have all that correct? What am I missing? What is it I am not understanding about this?
There must be something else in play in this case, because it sounds like any American is in jeopardy of suffering Mr. Metcalf's fate if government, any government at all within the United States, constructs a school, or even consents to the declaration of an existing structure to have such a use, within 1,000 feet of that American's residence, business or other property.
To Franlin Branworth:
You are missing this from the article -
"Testimony established that he has possessed the firearm on public property within the school zone, and has chased automobiles he believes may be associated with his former neighbor. He has previously been advised that he is prohibited from possessing a firearm within the school zone, but he has stated his belief that the law is unconstitutional and has asserted his right to do so."
They say he was on the sidewalk near his home, with his single shot shotgun, within a thousand feet of the school property boundaries.
There is an exemption in the Gun Free School Zone Act for private property, and for someone who has a license from the state in which the school exists. Montana law creates a license, by law, for all people in the state who are not legally disqualified from possessing firearms, specifically to protect people in Montana from the unconstitutional Gun Free School Zone Act.
Gabriel Metcalf should be exempt under the Montana law, from the Gun Free School Zone Act. Private property is exempt from the Gun Free School Zone Act, but it is alleged he was outside his private property boundaries at some times.
Post a Comment