Image screenshot from 5newsonline.com video, cropped and scaled by Dean Weingarten. Rifle believed to have been used to stop the murder.
The man who shot and killed Zachary Brian Arnold on 15 May of 2021, in Fort Smith, Arkansas, Wallace A. West, was justified in the shooting, according to Sebastian County Prosecutor Dan Shue. The incident was covered by AmmoLand previously.
More facts about the incident have been revealed. Wallace fired two shots, not one, as previously assumed. He missed the first shot. It was revealed Arnold had fired 93 shots when he was shot and killed by West. From nwaonline.com:
West, identified in the Police Department news release Wednesday as an off-duty employee of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, woke to the sound of gunshots, Shue wrote. He ran outside and saw Arnold shooting into Hicks’ apartment.
West then grabbed a bolt action rifle, which was scoped and loaded, from his gun cabinet, stepped onto his balcony and fired once at Arnold, missing him because he was “shaking so badly,” according to his witness statement.
Arnold turned and fired several rounds at West.
Arnold went back into his apartment, presumably to reload, and he came back outside, Shue wrote. He began walking down the complex, rifle in hand, according to West. West took a second shot, which struck Arnold in the head and killed him.
The article reports that West was an "off-duty employee of the U.S. Department of Homeland Security". It is unclear if West was a sworn officer or other employee. The Department of Homeland Security employs a great many people, about 240,000. It is unclear how many are sworn officers, probably less than half.
West was acting as an armed Samaritan when he shot Arnold, who had become mentally unbalanced. Arnold had previously served in Afghanistan, and suffered from PTSD. This was a tragedy for both families.
When a sheepdog goes rabid, to use the popular analogy, they have to be put down.
That seems to be the unfortunate case with Arnold. An armed Samaritan was willing to step up and do what was necessary, under fire. We owe Wallace A. West a debt. It is highly likely he stopped more unnecessary killing.
This correspondent prefers the term armed Samaritan to sheepdog, because it implies a Christian duty to defend the innocent. An excellent book on the subject was reviewed on AmmoLand in 2017. The moral implications are for all people. In the Samaritan story, the Samaritan was not a Christian. He was not even considered Jewish by the local elites in Jerusalem.
It remains to be seen if the FBI will include this incident as a mass murder stopped by an armed member of the public (citizen engagement, in FBI parlance). There is reason to doubt they will.
Researcher John Lott examined the FBI classification of various active shooter incidents. When Jack Wilson stopped the attacker after two members of the West Freeway Church of Christ were murdered in White Settlement Texas, it was not listed as a case of "citizen engagement" by the FBI. The FBI claimed this was not "citizen engagement", because Jack Wilson was a voluntary member of the church security team. Therefore, according to the FBI, it was not "citizen engagement", but law enforcement/security.
Lott makes the case the FBI has a bias toward minimizing the importance of armed Samaritans in stopping active shooters.
©2021 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.
Gun Watch
3 comments:
It is so sad to see what the FBI has become. I used to have a great amount of respect and admiration for that organization.
What is sad is how our government is crumbling before our eyes and nothing is being done to save it. The incompetence and corruption is very wide spread. Agencies created with little to no accountability Judges that make law from the bench elected officials that have never read the constitution and no understanding of the oath of office they take. Even supreme court rulings that are extremely corrupt and it is all due to the lack of adult education for the masses over several decades that have been dumbed down as to what being a responsible adult means How many of you can recite the bill of right. then how the hell do you know if your rights are being violated I recommend getting your own copy of the constitution and start reading. we have enough morons in elected office Most of the voting public is too stupid to pull their boots on when it comes to what their responsibilities are to vote intelligently. as long as the government keeps this hand outs coming we will splip into communism and then our constitution and our government will collapse like Afghanistan. What is the firs guarantee in the constitution? Is it the right to abortion or the right to LIFE?
Does the second amendment say Shall Not Be Infringed OR a little control cant hurt? The constitution was written and ratified by the people to control the power of government not so the government can control everything in your life. Personal integrity requires you arn what you have not for the government to take it away from some one that did earn it and give it to you. Everything the government buys with our tax money belongs to the people they took the money from. The government's responsibility is to manage what it buys with our taxes for us, the owners so that why is purchased can benefit every one equally. Disagree then blow your brains out because you are not using them..
Post a Comment