Wednesday, December 22, 2021

IL: Evanston gun Turn-in "buyback" includes 8 air guns, Antiques

 

 
Guns turned in at the Evanston "buyback"

Gun turn in events, labeled with the Orwellian term "buyback" are making a small comeback in the United States.  Most of them are occurring in states where private sales are not allowed by law. They are not occurring in states which require the valuable property to be sold for the public's benefit.

Illinois has a version of the law which requires private sales to go through the state web site, identify the purchaser of the firearms with a Firearms Owner IDentification (FOID), and be assigned an approval number.  This eliminates privacy from private sales. It becomes unworkable for private purchasers to buy guns legally at the gun turn-in events.

At the Evjanston, Illinois event, 53 guns were turned in on December 4, 2021. From wgntv.com

EVANSTON, Ill. — Evanston police held a gun buyback event on Saturday, just days after a shooting left four people wounded and one dead.

“It gets the guns off the street. Whether it’s one gun or five, today we had 53. It gets the guns off the street,” interim police chief Aretha Barnes said.

Today, citizens were given $100 for each gun and $25 for ammunition. The gun buyback began nine years ago.

“I’m a lifetime 5th Ward Evanston resident and I was concerned about the gun violence I was experiencing in the neighborhood, so I was planning to do a gun buyback,” organizer Carolyn Murray said.

The best academic study of these events shows they do not reduce homicide, gun crimes, or suicide. There is a small but statistically significant increase in crimes committed with guns in the two months after the event.

These events are propaganda, street theater, virtue signaling; they are symbolic not pragmatic.

They are meant to send the message: Guns are bad. Turn them in to the Police.

Eight of the 53 guns shown as turned in at the Evanston event were BB guns, CO2 guns or spring powered air guns. Presumably the people who turned them in received $100 for each of them.

Private purchasers at gun turn-in events eliminate the propaganda value of these events. They show the opposite message:

Guns are good. We pay cash.

Private purchasers buy the guns which are worth more than what the organizers of the event are willing to pay. It is a way for ignorant owners of guns, who want them out of their house, to get a closer approximation of what the gun is worth. 

An original military stocked 1903 Springfield rifle may have been turned in at the event (upper right corner). It could be worth several hundred dollars to a collector.  Several other firearms worth hundreds of dollars each were turned in. They include what appear to be Glock handguns, a Remington model 11 shotgun, a pair of antique 7-shot .22 revolvers, a near-new .22 lever action rifle, and others.

If the motive of the organizers were to "get guns off the street", they would welcome private purchasers. Private purchasers would stretch their money, moving guns from unwanted hands into the hands of responsible owners.

There was no indication of private buyers at the Evanston event. It appears the Illinois law worked to prevent private sales. 

Ideally, the organizers of these events would sell the guns they obtain in ordinary commercial channels, then use the money to  buy more guns from people who do not want them.

Moving guns from unwanted hands into responsible hands is not the intent.  Destruction of the valuable property appears to meet an emotional need. Organizers want to shift responsibility for bad events from people to inanimate objects.

When faced with the option of selling the guns or not having a turn-in "buyback" event, organizers choose not to have the event.

©2021 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

 


 

 

 


4 comments:

unavailable man said...

You have done such a amazing service for this country by tracking these events every day.. I have been looking for a long time for a way to donate to you - How can I support the work you do?

Anonymous said...

all of those requirements are called unconstitutional infringements and a violation of the right to privacy.

Anonymous said...

I had a Glock 17 stolen in 2001 and always wondered if they ran the serial numbers against the stolen list before destruction. Any input would be appreciated.

Anonymous said...

About center of that picture I think I see a mate to one I have. it appears to be a custom target pistol that cost right at $1,800.00 new. And it is now an antique. PB74 I have an order in to PB for ten, ten round magazines. Italy is a little slow at filing orders.