Sunday, July 16, 2017

Australian Gun Culture: .22 Ammo Prices


I visited Tamworth Firearms, in Tamworth Australia to check on the prices of .22 ammunition. There was a plentiful supply, and the prices for the Federal bulk pack of 525 was not too bad. At $42 for 525 rounds, it seems high, but the exchange rate is about 75 U.S. cents for an Australian dollar. Thus, $42 Australian translates to $31.50 American, including taxes.  That is 6 American cents per round.



Tamworth Firearms in Australia is laid out much like an American gun shop, except there are no pistols to be seen, and airguns are treated the same as firearms.

The .22 magnum cartridges were much higher priced.



At $23 Australian a box, that is 46 cents Australian per round, or 34.5 cents in American money.  At the Eycamp farm, officially known as Medway, I was shown a carton of .22 magnum ammunition with a price of $75 per 500 rounds. That is only 15 cents a round. Perhaps it was an old box, before the ammunition bubble, or when the exchange rate was more favorable to Australia.

The sales tax in Australia is figured into the prices that are displayed. In Arizona, the sales tax is added at the cash register, so that customers know how much tax is being added to the price. To be fair, the 7% sales tax in Arizona should be added to the Ammunition prices to compare them to the Australian prices. 

I visited the Cal Farms Store in Arizona shortly before I left for Australia. The Federal 525 value pack was on the shelf at $24.95. With the sales tax, the Federal .22 Long Rifle ammunition comes to $26.70 per 525 bulk pack, or 5.08 cents per round compared to 6 cents per round in Australia.  The .22 magnum CCI ammunition was listed at 29.98 cents per round in Arizona.  With the sales tax, that comes to 32.1 cents per round.  That is only a couple of pennies per round less than the magnum in Australia at Tamworth.

It appears that ammunition prices in Australia are close to those in the American market. Australia does not seem to have suffered from the bubble as much as shooters in the United States. It might be because the Australian shooters are just a small part of the overall market.

In general, prices are much higher in Australia than in the United States. Gasoline is above $5 U.S. dollars per gallon.  Food prices are higher. I paid $10 for a McDonalds 1/4 pounder meal with fries and a drink. No refills on the drink.
But for ammunition, at the current exchange rate, .22 prices are comparable.


©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

Saturday, July 15, 2017

Australian Gun Culture, Government Uses Iconic Dakota Arms as Amnesty Example part 5



I was seated in the Eykamp farm kitchen in NSW, Australia when Donald Eykamp stormed in and shoved a paper in my face. 
"Look at this!" He exclaimed. "That is a Dakota rifle! One of the most expensive production rifles in the world!  They cost $5,000 each. Look at the ebony fore end, the wrap around checkering, the grip cap, the classic peep sight, the short fore end, the inside the trigger guard magazine release, the Model 70 end of the receiver! Not one of these rifles have ever been used in a crime!"
I have two of them in South Dakota! I know what they look like!
Dakota Arms is one of the highest priced production rifles on the market.

The picture of the iconic Dakota Arms rifle is in an advertisement purchased by the Australian government for its ongoing firearms amnesty. During July, August, and September, the government will be allowing people to turn in firearms to the Australian government without arresting them for illegal gun possession.

Firearms that are unregistered, but which can be registered, will be allowed to be made legal.  So, an provisional mass murderer, who happens to have hidden away a $5,000 semi-custom version (the black ebony fore end is for an additional price), can now register this weapon of mass destruction after he has dug it up from its burial place. They can do this at a police station or at a gun shop.

Donald thought that the rifle in the picture was probably owned by a high up government official, when some picture of a gun was needed for the advertisement. My thought was that the owner of the advertising firm that the government contracted to do the ad might own it.

The advertisement could have been worse. They could have used a Holland and Holland double rifle in .470 Nitro Express.

I was at Tamworth the other day. If you look at the top article on the left of the picture, it mentions the problems they are having with flying foxes, which are large, fruit eating bats. They make a big mess, with bat scat landing on everything in sight. Donald says the townspeople hate them. There were thousands of them. I took a picture.


In the United States, those who push for a disarmed population, use pictures of "scary" AR 15 variants, or inexpensive pistols.

In Australia, they use $5,000 semi-custom hunting rifles used by elite hunters, all over the world. Those are the iconic types of guns that must be turned in to "make the community safer".

Most everything in Australia is a bit higher priced. Gasoline is $5 a gallon ($1.29 a liter).  The United States doesn't have to worry about flying foxes' scat.  We have pigeons and starlings.  If an American gun owner sees a Dakota rifle at a gun turn in, he will offer cash for it. In most American states, it would be legal for him to buy it, without government permission.

©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch




NC: Woman Shoots Man Attempting to Enter her Home



Deputies said a woman at 320 S. Plank Road grabbed her pistol after hearing somebody jiggling her door knob just before 11 a.m.

When the woman answered the door, Bryant Latrelle Martin, 29, of 281 S. Plank Road, attempted to force his way into the house and got into a struggle with the homeowner, authorities said. The woman told deputies that she fired several shots at Martin, who ran from the front porch.

More Here

OH: Armed Victim Shoots Robbery Suspect



COLUMBUS (WCMH) — Columbus police are investigating a shooting that sent a robbery suspect to the hospital.

According to the Columbus Division of Police, at about 7:22am, Thursday, officers were called to the 6000 block of Barbour Ridge Drive on the report of a shooting.

Police say during a robbery attempt, the victim shot the suspect.
More Here

Friday, July 14, 2017

Australian Gun Culture: "Safe Storage" and Registration: Part 4

Donald Eykamp working in Farm Shop
The Australian gun law requires two things that are often cited as "common sense" by those without an understanding of everyday gun use. They are universal gun registration and "safe storage".  Both have been weaponized against gun owners in Australia. They are an object lesson of what to avoid for those fighting for the right to arms in America and elsewhere.

Registration does nothing to prevent crime. Both New Zealand and Canada had extensive gun registration schemes similar to Australia's. Both concluded that gun registration is costly and not effective in preventing crime. Both repealed their gun registration schemes in favor of gun owner registration systems.

In the Canadian and New Zealand systems, once a gun owner is cleared to own guns, they can own guns without a problem. Guns can easily be transferred among legal gun owners and gun shops.

Pistols are restricted much more than long guns in all three countries.

In Canada, pistols have been registered for 80 years. In that period, there was only one ambiguous case where registration might have helped solve a crime.

In Australia, the registration system is dangerous and cumbersome for the gun owner. Only the person who registered the gun may use the gun. An exception is made for people who are in the presence of the gun owner.

A gun may be borrowed or loaned to another person for a hunting trip or for vermin control, or simply to try out, if the person the gun is loaned to has the proper license for that category of guns. If the gun is to be transferred for more than 14 days, the police have to be notified of the new "safe storage" location.

Only the gun owner is allowed to have access to the metal safe the gun owner is required to store the guns in.

Donald Eykamp, above, was diagnosed with cancer shortly after his guns were impounded. He beat the odds after a long hospital stay, extreme radiation treatments, and borderline chemotherapy. It is difficult and dangerous for him to walk. Falling could be fatal. He tires easily.

If he had his guns, they would have to be locked up except when he was using them. If he saw a wild pig rooting in the crops, he could not have his assistant get a rifle for him.  If the safe were left open, it would be in violation of the law.  Most of the charges against him are for "unsafe storage" because he briefly left two of his safes open, while living alone at his farm.

Another person is not allowed the combination to a safe or access to a key; that would be a violation.  If the other person were a licensed gun owner, it may be permissible for a person with the same level of license as the gun owner. A husband cannot allow his wife the combination to his gun safe.

Only licensed firearms dealers are allowed to manufacture, repair, or alter firearms or firearms parts.

It is seductive in Australia to circumvent the irrational law. That lays legal traps for the gun owner that can have severe consequences.

Australian Farm Gun Safes
In Donald Eykamp's case, $150,000 of his guns are still in police custody while the case is appealed.  18 highly valued rifles and shotguns were in a locked safe when he was raided. Those guns were allowed to be stored with a gun shop after Donald's fines were paid, by order of the court. The gun shops are legally liable for guns stored by owners, and charge a fee for storage.

The minimum fee offered Donald for storage was $35 per gun per week.  Donald's case has been ongoing for over 100 weeks. That would be storage fees of $3500 per gun!  Some of Donald's guns are worth more than that. Donald's case will set precedent.

Few Australians contest a case involving gun storage. The value of the guns would quickly be eroded. The guns have to stay in storage until a transfer is approved. Guns are tied to a single person when registered to them. They may be stored by another registered gun owner, if the other owner has the same level of license. If the storage is for more than 14 days, the police must be notified.

In Donald's case, his long relationship with a custom gunsmith allowed for a negotiated solution. Donald purchased a $900 gun safe for the legal storage of his guns in the gun smith's shop.  When the guns are gone from the shop, the safe will become the property of the gunsmith. As of this date, Donald's guns are still being transferred from that safe.

In Australia, the combination of universal registry of legal guns and the extreme "safe storage" law puts gun owners at legal risk. The interpretation of the law varies widely with individual law enforcement officers.  It is a prescription for the disaster that happened to Donald Eykamp.  The case is under appeal.  The results are expected in the next few weeks.

©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch










Thursday, July 13, 2017

TN: Robbery Suspect Shot by Armed Woman



A 49-year-old man was shot and is in critical condition after police said he attempted to rob a woman outside of her Midtown apartment early Tuesday morning.

The incident happened around 12:30 a.m. Tuesday in the 100 block of N. McLean near Poplar, police said.
More Here

OR: Woman Fires Gun to Stop Break-In



PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) – A woman fired two rounds from a gun at a person she believed was trying to break into her home, according to court documents.

More Here

Wednesday, July 12, 2017

Florida Open Carry Case Appealed to U.S. Supreme Court



The Dale Norman open carry case in Florida has been appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Most cases that are appealed to the Supreme Court are refused.

The case started back in 2012, when Dale Lee Norman walked down the street with his pistol showing.  He had recently obtained his concealed carry permit, and did not realize that his firearm was completely exposed.

He was convicted of the open carry of a firearm.  His case was appealed to the 4th Circuit court of appeals.   The state Advocate General fought very hard to keep the case from being appealed.  The case made it all the way to the Florida Supreme Court which ruled against Norman, 4-2, in a mixed decision. From news4jax.com:
The petition to the U.S. Supreme Court came slightly more than four months after the Florida Supreme Court, in a 4-2 decision, upheld the longstanding law. Monday's 35-page petition contends the law violates the Second Amendment and conflicts with U.S. Supreme Court rulings about gun rights.

“The issue is whether a prohibition on peaceably and openly carrying a lawfully-owned handgun infringes on `the right of the people to . . . bear arms' protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution,” said the petition, posted on the website of the group Florida Carry, which has helped represent Dale Norman, the man arrested in St. Lucie County.
The case was decided on the controversial basis of "intermediate scrutiny". 

The lowest form of scrutiny of law by federal courts is "rational scrutiny" virtually all laws are held to be Constitutional under that basis. The only requirement under "rational scrutiny" is that the legislature could have believed the law had some rational purpose.

In U.S. v. Heller, the Supreme Court held that mere "rational basis" could not be used as the level of scrutiny in basic Second Amendment cases. Some appeals courts have bypassed that prohibition by calling their level of scrutiny "intermediate scrutiny". In practice, "intermediate scrutiny" is "rational scrutiny" with a different label.  Those courts have used "intermediate scrutiny" to deny Second Amendment rights to defendants. That is what the Supreme Court of Florida appears to have done. From the petition for ceritorari:

Florida law provides for licenses to carry handguns concealed, but prohibits carrying firearms openly. Petitioner, who had such license, was convicted of openly carrying a firearm on a public street. The majority of the Florida Supreme Court upheld the ban under intermediate scrutiny based on conjecture by counsel about why the legislature may have banned open carry. 
The issue is whether a prohibition on peaceably and openly carrying a lawfully-owned handgun infringes on “the right of the people to . . . bear arms” protected by the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. That issue also involves the extent to which a restriction on a constitutional right may be upheld, under a proper standard of review, on the basis of a post hoc argument of counsel with no foundation in the legislative or factual record.
Very few cases that petition for ceritorari are accepted by the Supreme Court. This case joins the ranks of several others that deal with the Second Amendment right to carry arms outside of the home. At some point, the Supreme Court will need to deal with the issue.


©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

 

MO: Armed Victim Shoots at Armed Robber



When police arrived at the scene, they found a 27-year-old male victim who had been approached by a black man at 1014 Claudell Lane.

The victim told police the robber pointed a handgun at him and demanded his belongings. The victim said he pulled out his own handgun and fired several shots at the robber.
More Here

MI: Man Shoots Pit Bull Mix Attacking his Mastiff



The man said that his dog, a Mastiff, was still on the leash when the other dogs, a pit bull and a lab mix, squeezed through a gap in the fence. He said that the dogs then attacked his dog without provocation.

The man told police he tried to fight off the pit bull who was attacking his dog but was not successful. He was fearing for his life, he said, when he pulled a handgun and shot the dog twice, killing the dog.

More Here

TX: Armed Man Shoots, Wounds, Home Invader



A home invasion Wednesday night in Licking has been ruled self-defense against an aggressive home invader, according to Texas County Sheriff James Sigman.


Sigman said a 34-year-old man who lives at the Highway 32 home said a 28-year-old man was attempting to break into the home while cursing and challenging the homeowner. The man forced his way into the home, Sigman said, and the homeowner fired one shot from his pistol. The man said he was unsure if the bullet struck the person.


More Here

TN: Armed Man Shoots Robbery Suspect



MEMPHIS, Tenn. (localmemphis.com) - A suspected robber is in the hospital after police say he was shot while assaulting a man at a gas station.

The shooting happened at about 3:20 p.m. Friday on the 600 block of S. Highland.
More Here

Tuesday, July 11, 2017

Gun Promotion - Get a Roof, Get a Gun


In the Video below, the WeatherprooF Roofing and Exteriors company is offering guns as an inducement for purchasing their products.  With the final payment for a roof replacement and exterior repairs due to a hail or wind storm, you get a "free" gun.



Link to video

From goweatherproof.com
Why are we giving away AR 15s with every completed roof and exterior home repair? Because it symbolizes, at our core, who we are; True American Patriots. Just like the AR 15 we’re promoting, our roofs are built for Americans, by Americans. We chose the AR 15 for this promotion because, for patriots like us, its true representation is the high cost of freedom we enjoy in these United States.

The natural question is, “Why give an AR 15 to civilians?” The answer is found in the beliefs that shaped our nation by our founding fathers; that a well-armed population is the best defense for protecting your life, liberty and happiness.

The leaders of Weatherproof Roofing & Exteriors are Bible-believing, gun-owning patriots that believe gun ownership is both a privilege and a right.
There is a long history of using guns as an inducement to sell products in the United States. In San Francisco, in 1887, the San Francisco Chronicle gave away free .38 caliber revolvers with newspaper subscriptions. Guns have been given away for opening bank accounts and for buying trucks and cars

The gun promotions always seem to work well. There are far more people who value and want guns than there are people who are turned off by gun promotions.

Every gun promotion that I have investigated has been a greater success than the promoter thought it would be. There are numerous reasons for this success.

It is usually better to be a contrarian, doing something that makes you stand out from the crowd. A gun promotion fits this criteria, giving the marketer significant publicity for free. In addition, the popularity of guns has been downplayed by the Establishment media. This gives those who go against the narrative that "guns are bad" an advantage, because they appeal to the large majority of Americans who believe, contrary to the narrative, that guns are valuable, and thus, good.

Weatherproof Roofing has a winner with this promotion.  The promotion has been so successful that the business is in the process of expanding his company.

©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch






NE: Hastings Man Uses Handgun to Shoot Backyard Coyote


At about 9 p.m. Friday a 51-year-old Hastings man shot a coyote in the 1700 block of West Apache Avenue, Hastings Police Sgt. Mark Hinrichs said.

Hinrichs said according to the report, the coyote was near the backyard fence of the man’s house, taunting his dogs. The man shot and wounded the coyote, causing it to run from the scene.

More Here

ME: Woman Kills Neighbor's Uncontrolled Mastiff



The Portland Press Herald reports (http://bit.ly/2toT4CB ) Leroy Hart’s 2-year-old French mastiff, Max, was fatally shot after wandering into a neighbor’s yard. Freeport police say they received reports of a dog chasing livestock before the shooting.

Lt. Nathaniel Goodman said in a statement Thursday the police department is not considering any charges after reviewing facts in the shooting and state laws. The woman’s name wasn’t immediately known.

More Here

Followup OK: Neighbor Justified in Shooting Man to Save Twin Babies



ADA, Okla. — It was a case that stunned residents in a small Oklahoma city earlier this year – a resident told police he shot and killed his neighbor to keep the man from drowning two young children.

On Thursday, a little more than a month after the shooting, officials announced that the case is closed – the Pontotoc County District Attorney ruled the shooting was a ‘justifiable use of deadly force under Oklahoma Law.’
More Here

Monday, July 10, 2017

TX: Coffee Shop Plans to cater to Second Amendment Supporters



A coffee shop that caters to Second Amendment Supporters and armed customers is hoping to open in 2018. So far it is only a web site with an online store that sells ground coffee and T-shirts.  They are seeking investors, if you are  interested.

Here is a description of the proposed enterprise, from their web site. From operatorcoffee.com:
To us, Operator Coffee is more than a coffee shop, it's a cause. We are a group of airborne veterans, special operations veterans, and active members of the shooting community. The idea for Operator Coffee was born out of a love for quality coffee and the desire for a way to get veterans and shooters together. When veterans leave the military it is easy for depression to set in. The loss of military and combat brotherhood, combined with a belief in being misunderstood by the civilian world can be overwhelming. With veteran suicide on the rise, we want to create a place for veterans to get together, reestablish that bond, and seek support from brothers and like minded individuals. Operator Coffee isn't just for vets though, everyone in the 2a community is welcome to join in the fun. Our goal is to become the family favorite for all second amendment supporting citizens. Join us as we build a coffee company that supports the second amendment, veterans, law enforcement, and traditional conservative values.
It might become a competitor to the VFW, without the requirement that you have served overseas.  At present, it appears to be another interesting idea seeking financial backing.

 ©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch





Anti-Second Amendment Academics Shot Down in Texas Campus Carry Case


In August, 2016, two professors from the University of Austin, Texas, and an Associate Teaching Assistant Professor, sued the Attorney General of Texas, Ken Paxton, the President of the University of Texas, Austin, and the Members of the Board of Regents of the University of Texas at Austin.

A number of frivolous claims were offered in an attempt to stop the Texas statute allowing exercise of the Second Amendment on Campus from going into effect. The claims included that the law is vague, the law violated the plaintiffs' First Amendment, Second Amendment, and Fourteenth Amendment rights.  The arguments were childish, irrational, emotional rants.  Here is an example:

48. The Texas statutes and university policies that prohibit Plaintiffs from exercising their individual option to forbid handguns in their classrooms violate the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution, as applied in Texas through the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. These policies and procedures deprive Plaintiffs of their Second Amendment right to defend themselves and others in their classrooms from handgun violence by compelling them as public employees to passively acquiesce in the presence of loaded weaponry in their place of public employment without the individual possession and use of such weaponry in public being well-regulated. This infringement lacks any important justification and is imposed without any substantial link between the objectives of the policies and the means chosen to achieve them.
Judge Lee Yeakel heard the claims, read the suit, and concluded that the plaintiffs had no standing because they had not suffered any harm.  From reporternews.com:
A federal judge has dismissed a long-shot lawsuit filed by three University of Texas at Austin professors seeking to overturn the state's 2015 campus carry law, which allows people to carry concealed handguns inside most public university buildings.

District Judge Lee Yeakel wrote in his decision that the professors — Jennifer Lynn Glass, Lisa Moore and Mia Carter — couldn't present any "concrete evidence to substantiate their fears" that campus carry would have a chilling effect on free speech.

From the decision, at texasattorneygeneral.gov(pdf):
The court concludes that Plaintiffs have not established an injury-in-fact, nor that the alleged injury is traceable to any conduct of Defendants. Friends of the Earth, 528 U.S. at 180-81. Accordingly, the court will dismiss this cause for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Crane v. Johnson, 783 F.3d 244,251 (5th Cir. 2015). ("Because [appellants] have not alleged a sufficient injury in fact to satisfy the requirements of constitutional standing, we dismiss their claims for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.")

III. CONCLUSION

IT IS ORDERED that UT Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint (Clerk's Doc. No. 64) and Defendant Ken Paxton's Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint (Clerk's Doe. No. 65) are GRANTED
 The results of the lawsuit are were expected. The claims were frivolous to those who actually read them.

It took nearly a year for the court to reach that conclusion.  Some Minnesota students attempted to duplicate the Texas protests. No serious incidents have been associated with the restoration of Second Amendment freedoms on Campus.  Other than the Minnesota copy cat protests,  protests related to Texas Campus Carry have withered away.

©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch



LA: Armed Victim Shoots Assailant


According to the victim, he was walking when he was suddenly body slammed to the ground by an unknown black male. Because he says that he feared for his life, he told the man that he was armed.

Police says the victim then pulled his gun from his waist and shot the suspect three times. The suspect then fled the scene while reaching for his waistband.
More Here

NC: Man Shoots Intruder in Legs



LUMBERTON — A Lumberton businessman says a fleeting thought of his mother probably saved the life of a teenage intruder early Friday as he made a decision to shoot to hurt, not kill.
More Here

MS: Store Owner Shoots Teen in Ear When Burglar Reached for Gun




BATESVILLE, Miss. - A Batesville store owner who had enough of people breaking into his store camped out and waited on the burglars.

When two broke into his store early Wednesday morning, he shot one of them as the burglary suspect reached for a gun.

More Here

Sunday, July 09, 2017

PA: State Law Allows Guns and Knives in Schools for Lawful Purposes



In Pennsylvania, it is illegal to possess a weapon on school grounds. There are broad exceptions. From 18 Pa.C.S. 912(c):
(c) Defense.--It shall be a defense that the weapon is possessed and used in conjunction with a lawful supervised school activity or course or is possessed for other lawful purpose.
 The words are clear. The meaning is plain.  On 16 February, 2017, the Superior Court of Pennsylvania correctly decided to uphold the plain language of the law.  From Commonwealth v. Goslin (pdf):
We conclude that the language of Section 912(c), though broad, is unambiguous, and that Appellant possessed his pocketknife on school grounds for “other lawful purpose.” Therefore, we vacate Appellant’s Judgment of Sentence and order a new trial.4
The Superior Court decision was filed on 16 February, 2017. It did not take long for another law abiding citizen to be saved from the clutches of overzealous bureaucrats: From delcotimes.com:
Jordan was charged with a single count of possessing a weapon on school property. That charge was withdrawn Friday, however, due to new guidance from the Pennsylvania Superior Court in another case, Commonwealth v. Goslin.

That opinion, filed Feb. 26, stated that carpenter Andrew Goslin brought a work knife with him to a meeting at an elementary school. He was found guilty of possessing a weapon on school property during a bench trial, but appealed the verdict.

The statute provides that “it shall be a defense that the weapon is possessed and used in conjunction with a lawful supervised school activity or course or is possessed for other lawful purpose,” according to the opinion.

Goslin argued on appeal that the trial court misread the statute to require that the “other lawful purpose” must be related to the reason that the possessor is on school property. The Superior Court agreed and vacated the conviction.
Jordan had a legally possessed pistol in his backpack.  He has a valid Pennsylvania concealed carry permit. 

The Superintendent of the school, Daniel G.l Nerelli is a typical waffling bureaucrat. He says he supports the Second Amendment... but ... In other words, he only supports the Second Amendment when he finds it convenient to do so. From delcotmes.com:
Whelan said he supports the Second Amendment, but does not agree with the law as written and would raise the issue with local legislators to see if it can be amended.
It is only recently that guns and knives have been considered "forbiden" in schools. They were fairly common in schools when I was growing up. The Federal government started to encourage schools to ban guns in 1990 and 1994. After those bans were put into effect, mass school shootings increased 440%.

Bans on guns and knives in schools do not increase school safety. They are emotionally driven, and have the intention of delegitimizing the exercise of the Second Amendment.

The Pennsylvania Superior Court ruling in Commonwealth v. Goslin is an appropriate and commonsense step away from eviscerating the rule of law.

©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch



MN: Bicyclist Shoots Pit Bull in Self Defense


With enough effort, the animal was said to have broken its chain before running towards the complainant. The caller said he was afraid and believed the pit bull intended to hurt him, so he drew a handgun and shot the dog in the right shoulder.

According to the report, the dog was in the middle of the street by the time the shot was fired. The animal moved back a few feet before charging the complainant a second time, but, this time, a shout at the dog was sufficient to cause it to retreat.
More Here

C.J. Grishem's Guns Finally Returned (Founder of Open Carry Texas)

C.J. Grisham fought for, and passed, open carry legislation in Texas, partially restoring a right infringed on for more than 147 years.


The weapons seized more than four years ago from Temple resident C.J. Grisham after his arrest by the Temple Police Department were finally returned to him Friday.

A video by Grisham’s son of the arrest went viral in the case that gained national attention and sparked the founding by Grisham of Open Carry Texas, a gun rights activist group.

The guns and ammunition were picked up at the Bell County Sheriff’s Department, which was one of the entities contacted in December 2013 that claimed it didn’t have the guns.

“I’m relieved that after 1,567 days, I finally have the guns back that were stolen from me by Temple Police Department on a back country road where I was minding my own business,” Gri­sham said Wednesday.

More Here

ME: Harvey Lembo will not be Prosecuted for Using Russian Nagant Revolver



Harvey Lembo, a Rockland resident who shot an intruder who broke into his apartment in an attempt to rob him, will not be prosecuted, according to the Knox County District Attorney.

Lembo, 69, shot Christopher Wildhaber, 47, during the Aug. 31, 2015 attempted burglary at Park Place apartments. Lembo, who is disabled, had bought the 7 mm Russian-made handgun that he used to shoot Wildhaber just days before the attempted burglary. Lembo said he purchased the gun because his apartment had been broken into three times previously.

“The Knox County Office of the District Attorney has reviewed this matter, and we have declined prosecution,” District Attorney Jonathan Liberman said in a July 6 email.
More Here

Followup IN: No Charges for Dean Keller shooting Jeffrey S. Weigle



The June 27 showdown was captured on security video, Cooper said, noting it clearly shows Jeffrey S. Weigle, 59, raising a handgun just before Dean Keller, 49, shot him multiple times in the 1200 block of Campbell Road just east of Greenwood.

Keller claimed self-defense. Cooper agreed.

"The decision to not file charges on Keller was a simple application of Indiana law and should not be looked upon as condoning the behavior of either party," Cooper said.
More Here

AK: Bear Shot in "Defense of Life and Property"


The homeowner, whom police did not identify, told officers he was in the process of "re-securing his trash trailer" when he saw the sow and three cubs in his yard with trash.

"He said (he) was able to scare off the bears with an air horn. He said he then grabbed a gun and went back out to pick up the trash left behind by the bears. When he noticed the bears had returned, he sounded the air horn for a second time, and at that time, he said, the sow charged him," according to a police summary. "He said he then fired his gun and shot and killed the bear."

Police said the cubs remained in the area but eventually left. No one was injured and no citations were issued, according to police.

Marsh said at this point, both July 4 bear shootings were considered in "defense of life or property."

More Here

Saturday, July 08, 2017

GA: Off Duty Officer Shoots, Kills Man who was Stabbing Woman



Authorities tell news outlets that Brunswick Officer Aldrid Spaulding III was in the area Monday evening, and someone alerted him to a domestic dispute outside an apartment.

The bureau says David Leon Bell was stabbing the woman when Spaulding arrived and the officer shot him.
More Here

OK; Gunfight, Fireworks Owner's Son Survives, Robbery Suspect Dies



The stand’s owner said the robbers fired a shot first, so his son fired back. Deputies say the son ran after two men and jumped into the bed of their truck.

Authorities say the shooter’s father got into his car and followed the truck to 65th and Edison where deputies say the surviving person of interest ran away empty-handed.
More Here

OH: Woman Shoots, Kills Man Attempting Break-In

A Dayton resident shot and killed a man who tried to enter her home Tuesday evening, according to Dayton Police.

More Here

NICS Background Checks Continue High for June, 2017



The Trump era of the National Instant Criminal Background  Check System  (NICS) checks has finished its first six months.

The NICS checks for June, 2017 were 1,901,768.  That is the second highest number of NICS checks for any June. The highest was in 2016, with 2,131,485. The third highest June was in 2015, with 1,529,057.  Both of those were driven by fear that strong gun control measures might be passed by President Obama. 

Firearm sales and NICS checks have not dropped precipitously with a Trump presidency as expected.  Instead, gun sales and NICS checks have stayed at high, near record, or record levels in 2017.  The total background checks for the first half of 2017 are 12,601,102.  That is on track to be higher than any other previous year, except for 2017, which has the current record. The June, 2017 NICS checks are 89% of the 2017 figures.

The high number of NICS checks reflects an expanded base of firearms owners and shooters who are buying more guns under the expectation of a prosperous Trump Presidency. 

The firearms inventory is high, with many manufacturers lowering prices.  AR 15 type rifles have become the most popular rifle in America. Prices have plummeted. A base AR 15 can be purchased for under $500.  Ammunition prices are falling back toward where they were before President Obama.

The number of people with carry licenses continues to soar. There are over 15 million. At the time of this report, the number has likely surpassed 16 million. They are 5-15% of voters in many states, some crucial swing states like Pennsylvania, Michigan, Ohio, and Wisconsin. When a carry permit is obtained or renewed, another NICS check is done.


Kentucky contributes to the number of NICS checks by performing a NICS check on every Kentucky concealed carry permit holder every month. Kentucky performs nearly three million checks every year.

The fear of violence from the Left, as shown in Berkley, Portland, the District of Columbia, and San Francisco, may be leading to more firearm sales.

The media propaganda against President Trump has driven people on the left to buy guns and ammunition.

There has been a gradual increase in the use of NICS for things other than firearm sales.  The increases are for such transactions as the sales of suppressors/silencer, and even checks on school teachers.

The average ratio, of the number of NICS checks to additions of firearms to the private stock in the United States, over 15 years, is a little less than .6 NICS checks per firearm.

If that ratio holds true, over 7.5 million guns were added to the private stock in the first half of 2017.

The expected drop in firearms sales has been minimal. Sales are at historical high levels, only a little less than the records set in 2016.  If the economy continues to pick up, 2017 could become a record year for NICS checks.

 ©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

Friday, July 07, 2017

Australian Gun Culture Climate of Fear

Australian Farm Guns


One of my hosts in Australia gave me a lead for a story.  They knew someone with an extensive gun collection. Directions were given; the collector had been called and was waiting.  A local who was known to the collector would drive me there and make introductions.

The directions were complex, typical rural directions: follow this road; go up this hill; make a right, then go a ways and make a left. Look for the long drive with such and such a fence..

My driver understood them perfectly, and we arrived at the correct place.  The collector had a nice display, similar to many I have seen in the United States. There were deer rifles, shotguns, and a .22. There was a reloading bench and empty cases.

I asked if I could take pictures.  No problem, said the collector. Knowing a bit about Donald Eykamp's case, I was not so certain.

The collector was adamant. His set-up had been approved by the police. There was nothing to worry about. Donald Eycamp's case was a rare exception.

To my untrained eye, there were a number of "gray" areas. The fact that I could see several firearms on display was the most obvious.

We talked about guns, and legislation, and hunting. The collector was a strong supporter of the existing system. He saw no practical use for pistols. He had never been interested in them. It was clear he was an accomplished marksman.

The next day, Donald and I were performing some chores for the Eykamp farm. A part was needed for a critical piece of machinery.  As we drove to get it, I expressed misgivings about publishing an article about the collector. It seemed far too risky.  Why put an innocent man at risk for what was a plain Jane story of gun ownership?

A couple of hours later, we arrived back at the farm. A phone was in the hands of one of the Eykamps. I was called over. Had I published the story? No.

The Collector and his wife had thought it over. No, please do not publish the story, they pleaded. Her voice was frightened.  Please do not publish any pictures, any names, or any thing that might identify where I had been and who I had talked to. It was simply too risky.  Having come to the same conclusion, I attempted to reassure them. I suspect they are anxiously wondering if this Yank can be trusted.

Later, I visited a local gun store.  This one, the first Australian gun store I visited, reminded me of gun stores I have seen in large urban centers. The name was non-descript, and had nothing relating to guns about it. No signage indicated anything to do with guns. The shop was part of another building, with parking in the back. Once parked you approached a formidable door with a buzzer and an intercom.  To enter, you buzzed the shop, and stated your name and purpose. I had a local customer with me for an introduction, so we entered without a problem.

This is in rural Australia, which has a crime rate similar to Vermont; which is to say, almost none.  The owner was clear: he did not wish to be photographed.

Australians on the Internet tell me there is no problem having guns in Australia.  The local police are not bad blokes, and inspections are not common. But when they have time to think of potential consequences, the fear becomes apparent. Many of these gun owners are prosperous. They have a tremendous amount to lose, not just in money, but in reputation, and in lifelong heirlooms and treasured hunting guns.

I wasn't too surprised the collector and his wife had second thoughts about featuring him in a story made public to half the world.  It was not safe.

The Australian police forces are structured differently than police in the United States. Most police functions are done by state police. These police may view a posting to rural Australia as a punishment. This means new and young police officers may not have strong ties to the community that they police. It is these officers who are most likely to find irregularities in gray areas of the law.  A large "bust" with the confiscation of an "arsenal" could be a ticket to a more desired assignment in a large city.

Crime has generally been low in Australia. Several studies have shown that the gun laws made no difference in the Australian crime rates.

The "crimes" committed by legal gun owners in Australia are so rare as to be nearly undetectable.  But the purpose of the gun law in Australia is not to reduce crime. It is to reduce the number of gun owners. The number of legal Australian guns has increased, once people became used to the byzantine twists and requirements of the strict Australian laws put in place since 1996.  Those who want a disarmed Australia say that is proof the gun laws are not strong enough.

Australian gun owners have good reason to fear strict enforcement of their laws.  It is far too easy to violate them, even with all the common sense and good intentions that can be garnered in rural Australia.

©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch










AR: Relative Shot, Killed during Attempted Break In

Mountain Home resident Paul James Assaf was shot and killed Tuesday night when he allegedly attempted to break into the residence of one of his relatives, according to an updated news release from Mountain Home Police Chief Carry Manuel.

More Here

OH: Dog Attacks Girl, is Shot by off duty Officer

Police say an off-duty sheriff's deputy shot a pit bill in Cleveland after it attacked the woman who owned it and a 6-year-old girl.

More Here

KY: Teen Breaks into House, is Held at Gunpoint



Stevens says he woke up when he heard his wife screaming, so he grabbed his gun and pointed his pistol at the potential burglar.

Stevens says he held the teen at gunpoint until sheriff's deputies arrived.
More Here

AZ: Gun and Machete fight, One Suspect Dead



According to the Phoenix Police Department, there was a shooting near 35th Avenue and Bethany Home Road. Officials said a homeowner's house was broken into by two people; the homeowner and the suspects exchanged gunfire before the suspects got away.

The call was made to police around 2:30 p.m.

Police said the suspects were armed with machetes, and one was carrying a firearm.
More Here

MD: Resident Shoots, Kills, Intruder



Prince George’s County Police are still investigating, but say at around 12:30 p.m., two suspects entered a home in the 12600 block of Lusby Lane in Brandywine and then gunshots rang out. One of the suspects was shot and killed. The other one ran away. One of the home’s occupants suffered non-life threatening injuries.
More Here

Thursday, July 06, 2017

Ohio Reform of Gun Free Zone Penalties



A bill being considered in the Ohio legislature would reform the penalties for someone carrying a concealed handgun in current "gun free" zones. Current penalties are extreme.

A person who inadvertently enters such a zone in Ohio is subject to a felony charge, a maximum of 12 months in prison, and a $2,500 fine. A felony conviction removes the right to vote, or to own a fire arm under the Second Amendment.  People who have concealed carry permits are, statistically, some of the most law abiding people in the country. They are far more law abiding than the population at large, and are ten times as law abiding as police officers.  From wcbe.org:
The Republican-sponsored bill would let concealed carry license holders take their guns into gun-free zones including restaurants, schools and courthouses as long as they’re not caught. If they are caught and if they leave immediately they won't face criminal charges.

Luke Entelis, with Everytown for Gun Safety, says this would put the burden on business owners and school employees to confront the gun owner.
From HB 233

 C)(1) No person who has a valid license to carry a concealed handgun or who is a qualified military member and is discovered carrying a concealed handgun onto land or premises in violation of a sign posted pursuant to division (C)(3)(a) of section 2923.126 of the Revised Code or in violation of section 2923.12, 2923.121, 2923.122, or 2923.123 of the Revised Code shall do either of the following:

(a) Refuse or fail to leave the land or premises upon being requested to do so by the owner, lessee, or person in control of the land or premises or by the individual's agent or employee;

(b) Return within thirty days to the same land or premises while knowingly in possession of a firearm in violation of a sign posted pursuant to division (C)(3)(a) of section 2923.126 of the Revised Code or in violation of section 2923.12, 2923.121, 2923.122, or 2923.123 of the Revised Code.
The penalties would be similar to other non-violent acts, such as Disturbing a lawful meeting, Failure to disperse, or Selling or donating contaminated blood.

HB 233 has 51 co-sponsors. With the sponsor, that is 52 votes. There are 132 votes in the general assembly. One of the co-sponsors is Speaker of the House Clifford A. Rosenberger.  There are 24 Republicans in the Senate, and 9 Democrats. There are 66 Republicans in the House, and 33 Democrats. The Ohio Governor is John Kasich, who has an A rating from the National Rifle Association.

©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch






IL: Woman with Concealed Carry Permit Shoots Gun during Car Jack Incident



A woman with a concealed carry permit opened fire on a man after an attempted carjacking Wednesday on the city’s Northwest Side, police said.

Officers responded to the scene in the 2400 block of West Ohio Street in the city’s West Town neighborhood about 5:35 p.m. A 41-year-old woman said she was driving northbound on Western Avenue when a gray sedan struck her vehicles, according to police. She pulled over to inspect the damage when an “unknown male” jumped in her car and fled, police say.

The woman told police she saw another person, also a male, hiding behind a garbage can, police said. The woman opened fire at some point during the incident with her registered concealed weapon, according to Chicago police.


More Here

MO: Homeowner Shoots at, Kills Burglary Suspect

According to Layman, deputies responded to the home around 4 a.m. The homeowner said someone had tried to force entry into his residence. Fearing for his life, he fired a weapon at the subject. The subject fled the residence in an unknown vehicle.

More Here

FL: Armed Woman Shoots Man who Attacked her and Neighbor



Cheek told deputies what happened. She said she initially heard yelling outside of her apartment. When she looked out of her door’s peephole, she saw Morley physically attacking her neighbor, 52-year-old Susan Bass.

Fearing for Bass’s safety, Cheek armed herself with her handgun and confronted Morley demanding he leave Bass alone.

Morley immediately lunged at Cheek, who was standing inside the doorway of her condo. Deputies say Cheek was in fear for her and her 3-year-old’s life when she fired her handgun multiple times striking Morley in the leg.

More Here

Wednesday, July 05, 2017

Controversial Florida Judge Claims Legislature does not Have Power to Make "Stand Your Ground" Law




Controversial Miami-Dade Circuit Judge Milton Hirsch, intensely dislikes the "Stand Your Ground" concept. He ruled the legislature does not have to power to regulate the "Stand Your Ground" law.

The Florida legislature passed a reinforced "Stand Your Ground" law in 2017.  The new law stems from prosecutorial abuses, where people who are clearly justified in using force for self defense, are put through the criminal justice system, even though the chance of a conviction in the courts is slim. 

People charged with a crime faced years of court costs and uncertainty.  It is punishment by process. The legislature removed power from the prosecutors and gave it to judges, to prevent this kind of abuse.

"Stand Your Ground" laws have been popular. Two thirds of the States have similar law.  The elimination of a requirement to retreat in the face of deadly force has long precedence in the United States, starting with a Supreme Court ruling in 1895.

Judge Hirsh' decision cites English precedence to the effect that there is a requirement to retreat, and some American cases, but completely ignores the 120 years of precedence in the Supreme Court that supports the Stand Your Ground law. It shows Judge Hirsch' bias. From miamiherald.com:
Hirsch found that the changes to the law were “procedural,” meaning only the Florida Supreme Court has the right to make them.

Read more here: http://www.miamiherald.com/news/local/crime/article159394094.html#storylink=cpy
The ruling cites this part of the Florida Constitution, and makes the claim that the Legislature is changing a rule of the court, rather than making a law. From Ballotpedia.com:
    Text of Section 2:

    Administration; Practice and Procedure

    (a) The supreme court shall adopt rules for the practice and procedure in all courts including the time for seeking appellate review, the administrative supervision of all courts, the transfer to the court having jurisdiction of any proceeding when the jurisdiction of another court has been improvidently invoked, and a requirement that no cause shall be dismissed because an improper remedy has been sought. The supreme court shall adopt rules to allow the court and the district courts of appeal to submit questions relating to military law to the federal Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces for an advisory opinion. Rules of court may be repealed by general law enacted by two-thirds vote of the membership of each house of the legislature.
A former prosecutor and current member of the legislature, Senator Rob Bradley, disagrees.  He is the author of the law.  He believes the appeals court will overrule Judge Hirsch.  From usf.edu:
But, Sen. Rob Bradley (R-Fleming Island)—the new law’s author—disagrees.

“I would be surprised if it were upheld on appeal,” he said.
If the courts rule that the Florida Legislature overstepped its authority in this case, an alternative would be to reform the law by making it similar to law in Washington state. In Washington, if a defendant is found not guilty after a self defense claim is made, the state pays the court costs and legal fees of the defendant. This would be another check on the power of prosecutors to punish defendants with process costs.

 ©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch


AK: 11-Year-Old Stops Bear Attack

A rifle on a sling over your shoulder is much slower to get into action.

“There was four of them in a line … my son was third,” Clark said. “The bear came down the trail at them, fella in the front, who was his uncle, the bear was on him so quickly that he didn’t have time to take his rifle off his shoulder.”

The bear ran through the first two men, who were pushed to the side of the trail, leaving Elliot Clark in front of his unarmed cousin. The boy raised his pump action shotgun and shot the sow, hitting it with birdshot, which is often used just to scare bears off, Lucas Clark said.

“His first shot was a light load of birdshot. That first shot hit him in the shoulder and did absolutely nothing. The next shot hit him in the nose and traveled down through the neck,” Lucas Clark said.
More Here

OH: Armed Woman, in Wheelchair, Uses Gun to Drive Off Burglars



“It was last Monday morning around 10:30,” Melinda Vandal told Fox 8. “I looked at the door and there was a man, right there, right outside looking like he was going for my door.” She said she saw another man cutting the screen on a window of her garage.

Vandal, who is in a wheelchair, said she called police and grabbed her gun.

“I put the gun up to the window of the door and I yelled, 'get off my property,'" Vandal said. She said the suspects dropped a knife and took off.
More Here

Followup MI: "Road Rage" attack ended with Justified Shooting



Robert Chipman Jr., 43, of Newaygo, told deputies he shot both men during a physical altercation. Chipman has a valid state concealed pistol license, investigators say.

Friday morning, Prosecutor Chris Becker said that he will not be pressing charges against Chipman, believing that they would not be able to prove that Chipman was not acting in self-defense.
More Here

NY: NYC (Brooklyn) Gun Store Clerk Shoots Robbery Suspect A



A man pepper sprayed an ex-Marine employee at a Brooklyn gun store during an attempted robbery Wednesday — and then ran off as the worker shot at him, police said.

The suspect walked into DF Brothers Sports Center on New Utrecht Ave. in Bensonhurst and asked to see some of the guns just before 11 a.m.

When the shopkeeper, identified by friends as Frank, a 60-year-old ex-US Marine, asked to see his gun permit, the suspect pulled out the Mace and sprayed him in the face.
More Here

Tuesday, July 04, 2017

Followup CO: Michael Joseph Galvin not Guilty in Shooting of Robert Carrigan



A jury in Colorado Springs has acquitted a U.S. Army Green Beret who shot and killed an intruder in his detached garage.

The Gazette reports jurors found 35-year-old Michael Joseph Galvin not guilty Monday of negligent homicide in the November 2015 death of Robert Carrigan.
More Here

FL: Armed Homeowner Shoots 12 Gauge at Burglary Suspect




The couple told the Okeechobee County Sheriff's Office they returned to their home near 138th Street Tuesday evening to find their front door wide open.

The report says the husband went in to check things out, only to find a man inside his home.

He described his next move to emergency dispatchers:

“I went in and grabbed my wife's 12-gauge, put shells in it. I was as quiet as I could be. I told him to stop, or I'm going to shoot. He kept going and kept going, and then I shot at him twice. I’m almost positive that I didn't hit him because that 12-gauge would've dropped him,” the resident said.
More Here

Monday, July 03, 2017

Florida Concealed Carry Permit fees reduced by $5



As of 1 July, 2017, the fee for obtaining a Florida Concealed Carry Permit has been reduced by $5.  From cbemeraldcoast.com:
Florida residents will save $5 on application fees, down from $60 to $55, and renewal fees, down from $50 to $45, according to the Florida Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services. Active law enforcement officers, correctional officers and correctional probation officers can now obtain a new license for $55 and renew their licenses for $45.

This is the third time concealed weapon license fees have been lowered within the last five years, which has saved people a total of $20 when applying for or renewing a Florida concealed weapon license. Concealed weapon licenses are valid for seven years.
 The new fees have not been listed on the pdf fee schedule at the Florida Department of Agriculture, yet.  The fees listed show a fingerprint fee of $42, license fee of $60, for a total of $102 for the initial license. An applicant also must provide a passport type photograph for a few more dollars. Passport photographs as Walgreens and CVS cost $12.99.

With the $5 reduction in fees, a Florida permit can be had for $109.99, and the cost of sending in the application, fingerprint card, and photograph. Judges get there CCW for free, and Florida police and retired police get discounts, as shown in the chart. Florida expedites the processing of permits for active duty military and veterans.

Update: When I had my fingerprints done in Arizona, they cost $3 per card. The deputy sheriff who did the fingerprinting was friendly and helpful.  The Florida permit is a popular second permit. As of June 30, 2017, there were 224,053 out of state permits, From a total of 1,784,393 total permit holders. 30 states will honor the Florida permit issued to an out of state resident.

Research from the Crime Prevention Research Center indicates that the higher the costs to obtain a concealed carry permit, (or in a few states, license to carry)  the lower the percentage of people who obtain the permit or license. From crimeresearch.org:

Each $10 increase in fees reduces the percent of adults with permits by about a half a percentage point.
The fee reduction for a Concealed Carry Permit in Florida is $5. According to the research cited above, that should result in a .25% increase in the percentage of adults with Concealed Carry Permits in Florida.  The population estimate for adults in Florida in 18.8 million.   About 73% are 18 or older.  That is 13.7 million adults. In Florida the increase expected from the drop in price would be about 34,000 adults.

All across the nation, the number of carry permits is increasing. In some states, such as Indiana and South Dakota, the number is near 15% of adults. Because of the requirements to obtain a permit, virtually all permit holders are eligible to vote. I would expect the vast majority of them to actually vote. That means that permit holders make up to 30% of people actually voting.

Permit holders are becoming a significant voting block. In many swing states, such as Michigan, Wisconsin, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Florida, and Arizona, the Concealed Carry permit holder may be the swing vote that decides elections.


 ©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch




NV: Home Owner Shoots at Intruder, makes two hits



A Las Vegas homeowner shot an intruder twice Thursday morning during an attempted burglary, police said.

About 2 a.m., a homeowner on the 7700 block of Pyrenees Lane, near Blue Diamond Road, awoke to the sound of glass breaking and retrieved a handgun, the Metropolitan Police Department said. He fired several shots at a male intruder, striking him twice.
More Here

OR: Rancher Shoots Wolf that Attacked his Cattle



A Wallowa County cattle rancher shot and presumably seriously wounded or killed a wolf June 25 in the act of chasing livestock. It is the first incident of its kind in Wallowa County and the second in Oregon.

The rancher and his wife, who chose to remain anonymous, said they had suffered numerous instances of wolves harassing their cattle. The couple saw a wolf chasing a herd of cows on June 25 on a public land allotment in the Wallowa Mountains.

The rancher called county commissioner Todd Nash, who is chairman of the Oregon Cattlemen’s Association Wolf Committee, for advice. Nash told the rancher he could legally shoot the wolf. The man did and the animal limped away.
More Here

OK: Woman Stops Intruder with Empty Gun



Krystal was able to grab her gun and stop the man, and take him outside. They called 911 and police were able to respond quickly.

Krystal tells 40/29 News they normally keep one bullet in the gun, but her husband told her after the incident it was completely empty.
More Here

VA: Clerk Shoots Robbery Suspect

 A robbery suspect is in critical condition after he was shot by a 7-Eleven clerk Saturday, a source tells 10 On Your Side.

More Here

CA: Armed Woman Flees Home; Returns, Shoots Home Invader



Once the suspect had forced entry into her home, the woman fled her residence and then called 911 to report the break in, but she then saw the suspect leave her home.

Thinking she was safe, the woman returned to her home and then barricaded the front door. However, the suspect then broke into the home using a rear entrance, according to Sheriff’s Station officials.

This time around, however, the woman armed herself with a handgun. After a short confrontation with the suspect, the homeowner fired a shot at the suspect, hitting him in the chest.
More Here

Sunday, July 02, 2017

In Rural Australia "Sensible Gun Laws" not so "Sensible"


Rural Australia from Wh'od a Thought it Lookout in Quirindi.

Shortly after I started traveling into rural Australia, I found people willing to talk to me about firearms. When they learned I write about firearms, they were happy to have a conversation.

In the morning of July first, the day after I arrived in Australia, I packed up and pulled my wheeled luggage to the Central railway station in Sydney.  The staff at the station were very helpful. They printed out a ticket I had purchased over the Internet.  I boarded the train a half hour before departure. We left at 09:29

My seat mate happened to be traveling to Quirindi as well. It is a minor stop on the line, a bit over 200 miles from Sidney. We were of the same generation, and shared each other's stories.  I told her I wrote about guns. She told me her father had taken her to the range and taught her to shoot pistols. She had shot revolvers and later, a semi-auto.

That was before the Port Arthur massacre on April 28, of 1996. The Port Arthur massacre was the spark used to pass the extremely restrictive Australian gun laws. The resolution to override state gun laws was agreed to a few days later, on May 10th.  The details of the plan had been created far earlier. There was intense pressure from the media and Prime Minister John Howard to pass "sensible gun law". No real opposition was heard on the media. John Howard hated guns with a passion.

Australia went from a country with middle of the road gun laws, varying considerably from state to state, to one with extremely restrictive gun laws, almost overnight. Uniform national requirements for registration, waiting periods, treating airguns and replicas the same as real guns, were put in place in record time. No one is allowed to legally own a gun without stating a necessary purpose. Self defense is *not* considered a necessary purpose. Hundreds of thousands of guns were turned in to the government, paid for, and destroyed. No gun is allowed the be legally kept, except locked up and unloaded, with ammunition in a separate place, also locked up. These were touted as "sensible gun laws".

My seat mate thought it a shame her children and grandchildren could not experience the same  things she had experienced growing up. The current generation is being taught to fear guns. She did not have hope for change in a positive direction.

The country side we traveled through was beautiful.  It reminded me of the Shire from the Lord of the Rings movies. I saw horses and cattle and crops, and a kangaroo in a field. An hour later, I saw a dozen or more kangaroos in a field on the other side.  There were park-like forests, a couple of working mines, and a lovely long lake.

We arrived in Quirindi on time at 14:37.  My friend, Curtis Eykamp, was there to greet me. We had met in Yuma while he was doing experimental agricultural work.

Curtis took me to the farm that his father, Roy, had built up. Roy is 99 years old, clear headed, and tells fascinating stories of shooting and hunting. Curtis' son manages the farm.

Curtis' brother, Don, drove into the farm yard shortly after we arrived. I was introduced. Don had been told I wrote about guns. He began talking about the problems of "sensible gun laws". He asked that if I wrote about his case, that I explain to readers the result of "sensible gun laws" had been anything but sensible.

He has been at risk in a firearms case concerning "safe storage", for more than two years. The case did not receive much publicity. More than 50 firearms were seized, most of them high dollar collectible Winchesters. The vast majority were super grade pre-64 model 70 rifles, with some original Colt cap and ball revolvers. The antique black powder revolvers are pricey, but are not required to be registered in Australia.

Most of the guns were in  two safes, but the doors were open. A third safe was locked. Donald said he had opened the safes that morning to take out a few rifles with the intent of zeroing them for hunting, changing scopes, and adjusting the sights.

It was the end of irrigation season. After weeks of hard work, he could take some time off. He took five minutes to go down to the pivot pump and shut it off. When he returned, the police were in the yard.

The case started about 8:30 in the morning of March 14, 2015 (fall in Australia). The case is ongoing. A district court ruled the guns should not be destroyed, but should be transferred to a dealer, and the proceeds returned to Donald.

He may not possess firearms, because his license was immediately canceled.  Donald Eykamp has paid 18,000 dollars in civil fines.  There are no criminal charges before the court.

The police appealed the ruling, claiming that more than a hundred and fifty thousand dollars of highly collectible firearms and high dollar scopes should be destroyed, along with the Colt cap and ball revolvers.

I will be talking to Don in the days ahead to get more details of the case and where it is in the legal system.

We ate supper and listened to tales from 99-year-old Roy when he hunted wolves from an airplane in Canada in 1954. We retired for the night.

The morning dawned crisp and clear.  Roy and I were in the living room.  I looked out the window, and an Eastern Gray Kangaroo hopped by about 70 yards past the window. Roy's 99-year-old eyes are better than mine, but Roy was not looking out the window. Roy said he had not seen a kangaroo in the yard of the farm the entire 50 years he had been there.

Kangaroo tracks to the right of the hat

No one else had seen the kangaroo.  It was visible for a few seconds.  Minutes later, I checked for tracks.  I found them on a dirt driveway.

The political problems of firearms and regulation in rural Australia are similar to those in New York. Large metropolitan areas have most of the votes, and few firearm owners.  Rural areas have firearms, but not many votes. Australia has no Second Amendment.

Leaving a safe open for a few minutes while you travel to shut off a pump, on your own land, and return, is not much risk on an isolated farm where the only occupant is a prosperous, 72-year-old bachelor farmer.

But "sensible gun laws" are not applied "sensibly". Crime is virtually never committed with high dollar, high grade pre-64 Winchester rifles topped with the finest European scopes. Original Colt cap and ball revolvers are not much of a problem when gangs are manufacturing submachine guns for their own use.

In Australia, even guns that are antiques, and not required to be registered, are required to be locked up. John Howard said it was "only sensible".  Donald Eykamp has the means to fight the case in court. Not many do.

Rural Australians are paying the price of  former Prime Minister John Howard's phobia.

©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch
















Followup NC; Dead Lewisville Home Invasion Suspect Identified



LEWISVILLE — Authorities on Monday identified the suspect who was shot and killed during a home invasion and robbery at a Lewisville home.


Horace Wayne Vanlue Jr., 23, of West 25th Street in Winston-Salem, died at the scene, the Forsyth County Sheriff’s Office said in a news release. Authorities are waiting on ballistics tests in the case, but believe Vanlue was struck by a bullet from an assault rifle fired by a neighbor of the home-invasion victims.
More Here

Followup OR: Shooting of David Anthon Vaughn was Justified

A Southern Oregon man who fatally shot an intruder two months ago won't face charges.

The Jackson County District Attorney's Office said Monday that 26-year-old Christopher Haase of Rogue River acted in self-defense when he fired a single rifle shot that killed David Anthony Vaughn.

More Here

NV: Confrontation, Robbery Stopped, Training Stopped Unnecessary Shooting



While the thief grabbed an iPad and cellphone, the store owner was grabbing his gun from a safe.

When the man saw the gun, he immediately dropped the items and walked out with his hands up.

The store owner says he actually took a gun class a month ago as part of training for a concealed weapons permit.

He says he never had his finger on the trigger, and if he would not have taken the gun class, he probably would have shot the robber, something he’s sure he would have regretted.
More Here

Saturday, July 01, 2017

Congressional Staffer Could have Stopped Baseball Field Attack, but Second Amendment Rights were Chilled by D.C. law



In the aftermath of the baseball field assassination attempt on several Republican Congressmen and their staff, we are finding that District of Columbia infringements on the Second Amendment played a significant role in hampering defense against the attack. From freebeacon.com:
Rep. Barry Loudermilk (R., Ga.), who was at the baseball field when the attack took place but survived unscathed, told a group of reporters on Wednesday that while the Capitol Police acted in a heroic way to stop the shooter, things need to change. He said if the attack had happened back in his home state of Georgia, he or his staff may have been armed and able to help stop the attack themselves.

"There are several things to look at," Rep. Loudermilk said. "If this had happened in Georgia, he wouldn't have gotten too far. I had a staff member who was in his car, maybe 20 yards behind the shooter. Back in Georgia [he] carries a nine millimeter in his car. I carry a weapon. He had a clear shot at him. But here, we're not allowed to carry any weapons here.

Several Congressmen have said that having personal weapons at the ball field could have mitigated or shortened the attack. Representative Mo Brooks from Alabama said that he could have mounted an effective defensive action.  From the washingtonpost.com:  
Brooks, who took cover in the first-base dugout during the shooting, said that if he had had his pistol he would have fired at the gunman “with a surprise short-range attack.”

“As a consequence of none of us in that dugout having the ability to defend ourselves, that shooter was able to wound three more people,” he said.
Early efforts for legislation to reform the rigid District of Columbia gun laws have morphed into calls to pass national reciprocity, including the D.C. in the reciprocity formula.

It would be rational for such legislation to cover all territories that are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Constitution, including federal territories such at the District of Columbia, the U.S. Virgin Islands, Puerto Rico, Guam, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas Islands, and U.S. Samoa.

A source close to the Congressmen involved has been informed that Speaker Paul Ryan read the opinion piece by Representative Tom Massie of Kentucky
in the Wall Street Journal.  Ryan is reported as saying the piece convinced him, more than ever, of the importance of national reciprocity.

Update: There are national reciprocity bills in the U.S. House and in the U.S. Senate. The bill in the House is HB 38. The bill in the Senate is  S. 446. S. 446 has 37 co-sponsors. HB 38 has 200 co-sponsors, including 3 Democrats. Both bills have broad support.  Neither bill currently includes the District of Columbia or the U.S. territories.

There is precedent for national legislation to override state rules to allow the exercise of Second Amendment rights between the states. The Law Enforcement Officers Safety Act  (LEOSA) already overrides state law. Officers who could legally carry a gun during their career, and those who meet standards after retirement, are able to carry in all 50 states and in the Territories.  There have already been several federal court rulings to uphold LEOSA.


©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch
 

MI: Macomb County Clerk Stops Illegal Weapons Ban at Her Building



On Friday, June 27th, Karen Spranger went to work as the County Clerk in Macomb County, Michigan. When she arrived at 0730, the metal detection machinery and the armed guards had been removed. She had filed a lawsuit to cause this.  She had not been notified it would happen. 

In Michigan, public buildings are not allowed to forbid the exercise of Second Amendment rights, with an exception for court rooms or other official space used for official court business.

From macomdaily.com:
Security measures at the Macomb County Clerk and Register of Deeds office at the Talmer building in Mount Clemens have been removed as a result of court action filed by Clerk Karen Spranger that targeted the county’s policy on weapons-free zones.

The Macomb County Office of County Executive ordered the removal of the metal detector, X-ray machines and three security guards assigned to the building, Spranger announced Tuesday.

“The three full-time security guards are good people, but their wages and benefits are simply a waste of the Macomb County taxpayers’ money,” she said in a release sent by her private attorney, Frank Cusumano.

Two other buildings in the county have metal detectors and armed guards. They are the Macolmb County Circuit Court and the county Administration building. The Circuit Court likely falls under the court room exception for gun free zones.

The county Administration building may be another illegal gun free zone. 

It cost $40,000 for the equipment.  Three guards, full time, probably cost $250,000 a year per building in "security" costs.  As has often been said, it is easy to spend other people's money.

In the same article,  Deputy County Executive Mark Deldin made some interesting statements:
Deldin acknowledged that government functions operated in the renovated, former bank building do not fit the definition under state law as a weapons-free zone. They expected weapons-free designation could be successfully challenged in court.

“We felt when we put it in, even though we knew it was not protected by law, let’s err on the side of caution for employees and by the public that use that building,” Deldin said.
So the County executive is fine with performing illegal acts "on the side of caution".  Florida solved that problem by holding individual officers liable for disrespecting state law and the Constitution who performed similar actions. Local governments were forbidden to supply legal assistance in such cases. Suddenly, scofflaw actions by city and county officials stopped and were reversed.

More states are implementing policies to hold local officials personally accountable for violating laws that infringe on citizens' exercise of Second Amendment rights. Michigan does not have such a statute.

Spending a quarter of a million dollars a year for a measure of dubious value may be seen as poor money management. It is worse when the decision to do so is in contradiction to state law, and invites lawsuits to correct the situation. The taxpayers pay for the unnecessary equipment and guards, and then pay for the lawsuit that gets them removed.




©2017 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice and link are included.

Gun Watch

GA: Father-Son Victims Disarm, Choke,Shoot, Kill, Kidnapper


A kidnapper was choked and shot five times during a deadly confrontation after he forced a father and son to drive to an ATM at gunpoint early Wednesday, DeKalb County police said.

Police don’t expect to file charges against Roy Farrell, 39, and his 16-year-old son, who were first confronted by the suspect at The Oaks at Stonecrest Apartment Homes on Evans Mill Road.

“This was a justified shooting (self-defense),” DeKalb police spokeswoman Shiera Campbell said.
More Here